Re-assessing the diagnostic value of the enhancing capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma imaging.

Journal of liver cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.17998/jlc.2024.05.01
Jae Seok Bae, Jeong Min Lee, Bo Yun Hur, Jeongin Yoo, Sae-Jin Park
{"title":"Re-assessing the diagnostic value of the enhancing capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma imaging.","authors":"Jae Seok Bae, Jeong Min Lee, Bo Yun Hur, Jeongin Yoo, Sae-Jin Park","doi":"10.17998/jlc.2024.05.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>The enhancing capsule (EC) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis has received varying degrees of recognition across major guidelines. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of EC in HCC detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent pre-surgical computed tomography (CT) and hepatobiliary agent-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (HBA-MRI) between January 2016 and December 2019. A single hepatic tumor was confirmed based on the pathology of each patient. Three radiologists independently reviewed the images according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 criteria and reached a consensus. Interobserver agreement for EC before reaching a consensus was quantified using Fleiss κ statistics. The impact of EC on the LI-RADS classification was assessed by comparing the positive predictive values for HCC detection in the presence and absence of EC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 237 patients (median age, 60 years; 184 men) with 237 observations were included. The interobserver agreement for EC detection was notably low for CT (κ=0.169) and HBA-MRI (κ=0.138). The presence of EC did not significantly alter the positive predictive value for HCC detection in LI-RADS category 5 observations on CT (94.1% [80/85] vs. 94.6% [88/93], P=0.886) or HBAMRI (95.7% [88/92] vs. 90.6% [77/85], P=0.178).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic value of EC in HCC diagnosis remains questionable, given its poor interobserver agreement and negligible impact on positive predictive values for HCC detection. This study challenges the emphasis on EC in certain diagnostic guidelines and suggests the need to re-evaluate its role in HCC imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of liver cancer","volume":" ","pages":"206-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of liver cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2024.05.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: The enhancing capsule (EC) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis has received varying degrees of recognition across major guidelines. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of EC in HCC detection.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent pre-surgical computed tomography (CT) and hepatobiliary agent-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (HBA-MRI) between January 2016 and December 2019. A single hepatic tumor was confirmed based on the pathology of each patient. Three radiologists independently reviewed the images according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 criteria and reached a consensus. Interobserver agreement for EC before reaching a consensus was quantified using Fleiss κ statistics. The impact of EC on the LI-RADS classification was assessed by comparing the positive predictive values for HCC detection in the presence and absence of EC.

Results: In total, 237 patients (median age, 60 years; 184 men) with 237 observations were included. The interobserver agreement for EC detection was notably low for CT (κ=0.169) and HBA-MRI (κ=0.138). The presence of EC did not significantly alter the positive predictive value for HCC detection in LI-RADS category 5 observations on CT (94.1% [80/85] vs. 94.6% [88/93], P=0.886) or HBAMRI (95.7% [88/92] vs. 90.6% [77/85], P=0.178).

Conclusions: The diagnostic value of EC in HCC diagnosis remains questionable, given its poor interobserver agreement and negligible impact on positive predictive values for HCC detection. This study challenges the emphasis on EC in certain diagnostic guidelines and suggests the need to re-evaluate its role in HCC imaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新评估肝细胞癌成像中增强 "囊 "的诊断价值。
背景/目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)诊断中的增强 "胶囊"(EC)在主要指南中得到了不同程度的认可。本研究旨在评估EC在HCC检测中的诊断效用:我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2019年12月期间接受术前计算机断层扫描(CT)和肝胆剂增强磁共振成像(HBA-MRI)的患者。根据每位患者的病理结果确认了单个肝肿瘤。三名放射科医生根据肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LIRADS)v2018标准独立审查图像,并达成共识。在达成共识之前,使用Fleiss κ统计量对EC的观察者间一致性进行量化。通过比较存在和不存在EC时HCC检测的阳性预测值,评估EC对LI-RADS分类的影响:共纳入 237 名患者(中位年龄 60 岁,男性 184 人),观察 237 次。CT(κ=0.169)和HBA-MRI(κ=0.138)对EC检测的观察者间一致性明显较低。在CT(94.1% [80/85] vs. 94.6% [88/93],P=0.886)或HBA-MRI(95.7% [88/92] vs. 90.6% [77/85],P=0.178)中,EC的存在并未明显改变LI-RADS第5类观察者HCC检测的阳性预测值:EC在HCC诊断中的诊断价值仍然值得怀疑,因为其观察者间的一致性较差,对HCC检测的阳性预测值影响微乎其微。本研究对某些诊断指南中对EC的强调提出了质疑,并建议有必要重新评估EC在HCC成像中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Durable complete response after discontinuation of atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: the first report. Re-assessing the diagnostic value of the enhancing capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma imaging. Superselective ablative chemo-ethanol embolization for recurrent single hepatocellular carcinoma: a 6-month outcome analysis. Downstaging with atezolizumab-bevacizumab: a case series. Role of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases in the era of advancing systemic therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1