One-Piece CAD/CAM Abutment for Screw-Retained Single- Tooth Restorations: A 5-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Andrea Parpaiola, Marco Toia, Michael Norton, Christian Bacci, Claudia Todaro, Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena, Saturnino Marco Lupi
{"title":"One-Piece CAD/CAM Abutment for Screw-Retained Single- Tooth Restorations: A 5-Year Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Andrea Parpaiola, Marco Toia, Michael Norton, Christian Bacci, Claudia Todaro, Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena, Saturnino Marco Lupi","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance of implant-prosthetic rehabilitations carried out using ceramic-coated CAD/CAM titanium abutments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty implants were placed in 30 patients and rehabilitated with 30 single crowns attached to CAD/CAM titanium abutments. A conventional procedure was applied, implants were placed after postextraction socket healing, and prosthetic restorations were placed after implant healing. Implant lengths ranged from 6 to 15 mm, and widths were 3.6, 4.2, and 4.8 mm. At the time of prosthesis delivery (T0), after 2 years (T1), and after 5 years (T2), the Plaque Index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), pocket probing depth (PPD), marginal bone level (MBL), and pink/white esthetic scores (PES/WES) were evaluated for each implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patient dropped out of the study during the follow-up period. All 30 implants were clinically successful 5 years after prosthesis delivery (survival rate: 100%) and showed no signs of peri-implant infection. Peri-implant soft tissues were in good health (BoP at T2: 0% in 73% of patients; 25% in 13% of patients; 50% in 10% of patients; and 75% in 3% of patients). The mean PPD was 2.05 ± 0.56 mm at T0, 1.992 ± 0.6 mm at T1, and 1.867 ± 0.439 mm at T2. The mean MBL was 0.413 ± 0.440 mm at T0, 0.306 ± 0.388 mm at T1, and 0.263 ± 0.368 mm at T2. The mean PES, WES, and PES/WES indices (7.43 ± 1.04, 7.57 ± 0.82, and 15.00 ± 1.17, respectively) indicate good integration of soft tissues, satisfactory esthetics, and overall positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The success rates, maintenance of MBLs, and periodontal and esthetic indices suggest the validity of implant-prosthetic rehabilitations with CAD/CAM abutments in cases of single crowns.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"911-921"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of implant-prosthetic rehabilitations carried out using ceramic-coated CAD/CAM titanium abutments.

Materials and methods: Thirty implants were placed in 30 patients and rehabilitated with 30 single crowns attached to CAD/CAM titanium abutments. A conventional procedure was applied, implants were placed after postextraction socket healing, and prosthetic restorations were placed after implant healing. Implant lengths ranged from 6 to 15 mm, and widths were 3.6, 4.2, and 4.8 mm. At the time of prosthesis delivery (T0), after 2 years (T1), and after 5 years (T2), the Plaque Index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), pocket probing depth (PPD), marginal bone level (MBL), and pink/white esthetic scores (PES/WES) were evaluated for each implant.

Results: No patient dropped out of the study during the follow-up period. All 30 implants were clinically successful 5 years after prosthesis delivery (survival rate: 100%) and showed no signs of peri-implant infection. Peri-implant soft tissues were in good health (BoP at T2: 0% in 73% of patients; 25% in 13% of patients; 50% in 10% of patients; and 75% in 3% of patients). The mean PPD was 2.05 ± 0.56 mm at T0, 1.992 ± 0.6 mm at T1, and 1.867 ± 0.439 mm at T2. The mean MBL was 0.413 ± 0.440 mm at T0, 0.306 ± 0.388 mm at T1, and 0.263 ± 0.368 mm at T2. The mean PES, WES, and PES/WES indices (7.43 ± 1.04, 7.57 ± 0.82, and 15.00 ± 1.17, respectively) indicate good integration of soft tissues, satisfactory esthetics, and overall positive outcomes.

Conclusions: The success rates, maintenance of MBLs, and periodontal and esthetic indices suggest the validity of implant-prosthetic rehabilitations with CAD/CAM abutments in cases of single crowns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于螺钉固位单牙修复体的一体式 CAD/CAM 基台:一项为期 5 年的前瞻性队列研究。
背景:使用陶瓷涂层的患者专用 CAD/CAM 钛基台是修复单颗牙齿的一种治疗选择。使用高度定制化的基台可以对修复体进行精确的三维定位。本研究评估了使用陶瓷涂层 CAD/CAM 钛基台进行种植修复的临床表现:在 30 名患者身上植入了 30 个种植体,并在 CAD/CAM 钛基台上安装了 30 个单冠进行修复。采用常规程序,在拔牙后牙槽骨愈合后植入种植体,在种植体愈合后进行修复。本研究使用的种植体长度为 6-15 毫米,宽度为 3.6、4.2 和 4.8 毫米。在修复体交付时(T0)、两年后(T1)和五年后(T2),对每个种植体的牙菌斑(PI)和出血(BoP)指数、探诊深度(PPD)、边缘骨水平(MBL)和 PES/WES 进行了评估:随访期间没有患者退出研究。所有 30 个种植体在假体植入后五年内均临床成功(存活率:100%),且没有种植体周围感染的迹象。种植体周围软组织健康状况良好(T2时的BoP:73%的患者为0%;13%的患者为25%;10%的患者为50%;3%的患者为75%)。T0 时的平均 PPD 为 2.05±0.56mm,T1 时为 1.992±0.6mm,T2 时为 1.867±0.439mm。T0时的平均MBL为0.413±0.440毫米,T1时为0.306±0.388毫米,T2时为0.263±0.368毫米。平均 PES、WES 和 PES/WES 指数分别为 7.43±1.04、7.57±0.82 和 15.00±1.17,表明软组织整合良好,美观度令人满意,总体效果良好:成功率、边缘骨水平的维持以及牙周和美学指数表明,在单冠病例中使用 CAD/CAM 基台进行种植修复是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration: L-PRF Bone-Block Vs A Mixture of Autogenous Bone with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral. A Split-Mouth RCT Study with 25 Months Follow-Up. Influence of Dental Implant Diameters on Prosthesis Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Qualitative Analysis of Implant-Bone Interface After Implant Placement Implementing Condensation Technique In Vitro. Thermal Changes During Digital Guided Implant Surgery Using the Conventional and Single Drill Protocols. Effect of Primary Stability on Short vs. Conventional -Implants with Reverse Concave Neck.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1