Association of Opioid and Concurrent Benzodiazepine, Skeletal Muscle Relaxant, and Gabapentinoid Usage on Healthcare Expenditure and Resource Utilization: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study, 2009 to 2019.

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1177/29767342241247372
Aryana Sepassi, Meng Li, Kangho Suh, Britney Stottlemyer, Mark Bounthavong
{"title":"Association of Opioid and Concurrent Benzodiazepine, Skeletal Muscle Relaxant, and Gabapentinoid Usage on Healthcare Expenditure and Resource Utilization: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study, 2009 to 2019.","authors":"Aryana Sepassi, Meng Li, Kangho Suh, Britney Stottlemyer, Mark Bounthavong","doi":"10.1177/29767342241247372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare providers may be utilizing central nervous system (CNS) depressants to reduce opioid use due to recent changes in public policy. Combination use of these agents with opioids increases the risk of respiratory depression and death. Healthcare expenditures by individuals using these drug combinations have not been previously quantified. We sought to characterize healthcare costs and expenditures associated with a population reporting concurrent CNS depressants and opioid use compared with nonopioid analgesics in the United States from 2009 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A serial cross-sectional design was used to compare the healthcare expenditures of adult Medical Expenditure Panel Survey respondents who were prescribed nonopioid analgesics, opioids only, opioids/benzodiazepines (BZD), opioids/BZD/skeletal muscle relaxants (SMR), or opioids/gabapentin (gaba) using pooled data from 2009 to 2019. Expenditure (cost and resource utilization) categories included inpatient, outpatient, office-based, and prescription medicine. Average marginal effects were used to compare survey-weighted annual costs and resource utilizations across the groups as compared to nonopioid analgesic respondents, adjusted for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A weighted total of 34 241 838 individuals were identified. Most were opioid-only respondents (46.5%), followed by nonopioid analgesic (43.4%), opioid/BZD (5.3%), opioid-gaba (3.5%), and opioid/BZD/SMR respondents (1.3%). In comparison to the study groups with nonopioid analgesics, opioid-gaba users had the highest significant incremental cost difference among the different pairings (+$11 684, <i>P</i> < .001). Opioid-gaba, opioid/BZD, and opioid/BZD/SMR respondents had significantly higher inpatient, emergency department, and prescription drug costs and use compared to nonopioid analgesic respondents. Opioid-only respondents had higher outpatient and office-based costs and visits compared to nonopioid analgesic respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As healthcare providers seek to utilize fewer opioids for pain management, attention must be paid to ensuring safe and effective use of concurrent CNS depressants to mitigate high healthcare costs and burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"631-644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241247372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare providers may be utilizing central nervous system (CNS) depressants to reduce opioid use due to recent changes in public policy. Combination use of these agents with opioids increases the risk of respiratory depression and death. Healthcare expenditures by individuals using these drug combinations have not been previously quantified. We sought to characterize healthcare costs and expenditures associated with a population reporting concurrent CNS depressants and opioid use compared with nonopioid analgesics in the United States from 2009 to 2019.

Methods: A serial cross-sectional design was used to compare the healthcare expenditures of adult Medical Expenditure Panel Survey respondents who were prescribed nonopioid analgesics, opioids only, opioids/benzodiazepines (BZD), opioids/BZD/skeletal muscle relaxants (SMR), or opioids/gabapentin (gaba) using pooled data from 2009 to 2019. Expenditure (cost and resource utilization) categories included inpatient, outpatient, office-based, and prescription medicine. Average marginal effects were used to compare survey-weighted annual costs and resource utilizations across the groups as compared to nonopioid analgesic respondents, adjusted for covariates.

Results: A weighted total of 34 241 838 individuals were identified. Most were opioid-only respondents (46.5%), followed by nonopioid analgesic (43.4%), opioid/BZD (5.3%), opioid-gaba (3.5%), and opioid/BZD/SMR respondents (1.3%). In comparison to the study groups with nonopioid analgesics, opioid-gaba users had the highest significant incremental cost difference among the different pairings (+$11 684, P < .001). Opioid-gaba, opioid/BZD, and opioid/BZD/SMR respondents had significantly higher inpatient, emergency department, and prescription drug costs and use compared to nonopioid analgesic respondents. Opioid-only respondents had higher outpatient and office-based costs and visits compared to nonopioid analgesic respondents.

Conclusions: As healthcare providers seek to utilize fewer opioids for pain management, attention must be paid to ensuring safe and effective use of concurrent CNS depressants to mitigate high healthcare costs and burden.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物及同时使用苯二氮卓、骨骼肌松弛剂和加巴喷丁类药物与医疗支出和资源利用的关系:2009 年至 2019 年连续横断面研究》。
背景:由于近期公共政策的变化,医疗服务提供者可能会使用中枢神经系统(CNS)抑制剂来减少阿片类药物的使用。这些药物与阿片类药物联合使用会增加呼吸抑制和死亡的风险。此前尚未对使用这些药物组合的个人的医疗支出进行量化。我们试图描述 2009 年至 2019 年美国报告同时使用中枢神经系统抑制剂和阿片类药物与非阿片类镇痛药的人群的相关医疗成本和支出:方法:采用序列横断面设计,利用2009年至2019年的汇总数据,比较医疗支出小组调查(Medical Expenditure Panel Survey)成年受访者使用非阿片类镇痛药、仅使用阿片类药物、阿片类药物/苯二氮卓(BZD)、阿片类药物/BZD/骨骼肌松弛剂(SMR)或阿片类药物/加巴喷丁(gaba)的医疗支出。支出(成本和资源利用)类别包括住院、门诊、诊室和处方药。使用平均边际效应比较各组调查加权年成本和资源利用率,并与非阿片类镇痛药受访者进行比较,调整协变量:共确定了 34 241 838 名加权受访者。大多数受访者仅服用阿片类药物(46.5%),其次是非阿片类镇痛药(43.4%)、阿片类/BZD(5.3%)、阿片类-gaba(3.5%)和阿片类/BZD/SMR(1.3%)。与使用非阿片类镇痛药的研究组相比,阿片-gaba 使用者在不同配对中的增量成本差异最大(+11 684 美元,P 结论):随着医疗服务提供者寻求减少阿片类药物在疼痛治疗中的使用,必须注意确保安全有效地同时使用中枢神经系统抑制剂,以减轻高昂的医疗成本和负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study Protocol for the Healing Opioid Misuse and Pain Through Engagement Trial: Integrated Treatment for Individuals With Co-occurring Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder. Pain Care at Home to Amplify Function: Protocol Article. Addressing the Intersections of Chronic Pain and OUD: Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) Research Network. Connecting Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder Clinical Trials Through Data Harmonization: Wake Forest IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC). The IMPOWR Network Divided or Single Exposure Study (DOSE) Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Once Versus Split Dosing of Methadone for the Treatment of Comorbid Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1