SHIFTING PARADIGMS: EXPLORING ENARODUSTAT FOR ANEMIA IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE IN A META ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Lokman Hekim Tanrıverdi , Ahmet Sarıcı
{"title":"SHIFTING PARADIGMS: EXPLORING ENARODUSTAT FOR ANEMIA IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE IN A META ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS","authors":"Lokman Hekim Tanrıverdi ,&nbsp;Ahmet Sarıcı","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2024.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Anemia commonly accompanies chronic kidney disease (CKD). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), such as darbepoetin, are initiated for anemia in CKD. Additionally, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in treating CKD-associated anemia. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of enarodustat in anemic CKD patients.</p><p><strong>Case report</strong></p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A systematic search of Cochrane CENTRAL, Ovid Medline R, PubMed, and Web of Science databases up to March 1, 2024, was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing enarodustat with darbepoetin were included. Data from four unique RCTs comprising an inverse variance-weighted random-effects model were utilized for the main analysis. Primary efficacy outcome measures included hemoglobin (Hb) change at weeks 4-6 and during follow-up, while primary safety outcomes focused on serious adverse events (SAEs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on dialysis status and prior use of ESA for the primary outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four RCTs with 7 reports involving 586 patients were included in the main analysis. Enarodustat demonstrated superiority to control in terms of change in Hb levels at week 4-6 (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.50, I2=96%, p=0.04) but non-inferiority during follow-up (MD 0.66, 95% CI -0.22 to 1.53, I2=91%, p=0.14). Enarodustat exhibited comparable effects for safety and tolerability parameters such as SAEs (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.91, I2=0%, p=0.52), any adverse events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08), any adverse events leading to discontinuation (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.20), diarrhea (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 43.15), hypertension (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.84), and all-cause mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.08 to 5.08). Subgroup analysis by dialysis status revealed nonsignificant differences for change in Hb levels at week 4-6 and during follow-up, but comparator-based subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant difference only when comparing to placebo at week 4-6.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Enarodustat exhibits promise as a treatment option for anemia associated with CKD, demonstrating superiority to control in terms of Hb change at week 4-6 and non-inferiority during follow-up. Moreover, it demonstrates comparable safety and tolerability profiles to darbepoetin, making it a potential alternative in the management of CKD-related anemia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924000944/pdfft?md5=36b36a4ccc7d2a59cb04a9275032cfca&pid=1-s2.0-S2531137924000944-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924000944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Anemia commonly accompanies chronic kidney disease (CKD). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), such as darbepoetin, are initiated for anemia in CKD. Additionally, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in treating CKD-associated anemia. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of enarodustat in anemic CKD patients.

Case report

Methodology

A systematic search of Cochrane CENTRAL, Ovid Medline R, PubMed, and Web of Science databases up to March 1, 2024, was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing enarodustat with darbepoetin were included. Data from four unique RCTs comprising an inverse variance-weighted random-effects model were utilized for the main analysis. Primary efficacy outcome measures included hemoglobin (Hb) change at weeks 4-6 and during follow-up, while primary safety outcomes focused on serious adverse events (SAEs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on dialysis status and prior use of ESA for the primary outcome.

Results

Four RCTs with 7 reports involving 586 patients were included in the main analysis. Enarodustat demonstrated superiority to control in terms of change in Hb levels at week 4-6 (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.50, I2=96%, p=0.04) but non-inferiority during follow-up (MD 0.66, 95% CI -0.22 to 1.53, I2=91%, p=0.14). Enarodustat exhibited comparable effects for safety and tolerability parameters such as SAEs (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.91, I2=0%, p=0.52), any adverse events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08), any adverse events leading to discontinuation (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.20), diarrhea (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 43.15), hypertension (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.84), and all-cause mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.08 to 5.08). Subgroup analysis by dialysis status revealed nonsignificant differences for change in Hb levels at week 4-6 and during follow-up, but comparator-based subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant difference only when comparing to placebo at week 4-6.

Conclusion

Enarodustat exhibits promise as a treatment option for anemia associated with CKD, demonstrating superiority to control in terms of Hb change at week 4-6 and non-inferiority during follow-up. Moreover, it demonstrates comparable safety and tolerability profiles to darbepoetin, making it a potential alternative in the management of CKD-related anemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
范式转变:随机对照试验元分析中探索依那曲达治疗慢性肾病贫血的方法
目标慢性肾脏病(CKD)常伴有贫血。促红细胞生成素(ESAs),如达贝泊汀,是治疗慢性肾脏病贫血的首选药物。此外,低氧诱导因子(HIF)脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂对治疗 CKD 相关性贫血也有疗效。本荟萃分析旨在比较依那西普对贫血的 CKD 患者的疗效、安全性和耐受性。方法对截至 2024 年 3 月 1 日的 Cochrane CENTRAL、Ovid Medline R、PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了系统检索。研究纳入了直接比较依那曲达与达贝泊汀的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要分析采用了由反方差加权随机效应模型组成的四项独特 RCT 的数据。主要疗效结局指标包括第 4-6 周和随访期间的血红蛋白 (Hb) 变化,而主要安全性结局指标则侧重于严重不良事件 (SAE)。根据透析状态和先前使用ESA的主要结果进行了亚组分析。结果主要分析包括4项RCT和7份报告,涉及586名患者。就第4-6周的Hb水平变化而言,依那曲他优于对照组(RR为0.76,95% CI为0.02至1.50,I2=96%,P=0.04),但在随访期间无劣效(MD为0.66,95% CI为-0.22至1.53,I2=91%,P=0.14)。08)、导致停药的任何不良事件(RR 0.90,95% CI 0.37 至 2.20)、腹泻(RR 1.50,95% CI 0.05 至 43.15)、高血压(RR 0.89,95% CI 0.43 至 1.84)和全因死亡率(RR 0.63,95% CI 0.08 至 5.08)。按透析状态进行的亚组分析表明,第4-6周和随访期间的Hb水平变化无显著差异,但基于参照物的亚组分析表明,只有在第4-6周与安慰剂比较时才有显著差异。此外,它的安全性和耐受性也与达贝泊汀相当,因此有可能成为治疗慢性肾脏病相关贫血的替代药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The challenge of timely diagnosis and management of acute leukemias and associated infections in Latin America The Brazilian association of hematology, hemotherapy, and cell therapy (ABHH) and its absolute commitment to ethics and absence of conflicts of interest Diagnosis and management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: Brazilian consensus guidelines 2024 on behalf of the Brazilian Association of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cellular Therapy A SUCCESSFUL CASE OF PRIMARY PLASMA CELL LEUKEMIA TREATED WITH DARATUMUMAB-BASED THERAPY FOLLOWED BY AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION CARCINOMA EX PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA: DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1