All that glitters is not gold: confronting race-neutral perspectives on diversity and equity across STEM curricula

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Studies of Science Education Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1007/s11422-022-10117-4
Terrance Burgess
{"title":"All that glitters is not gold: confronting race-neutral perspectives on diversity and equity across STEM curricula","authors":"Terrance Burgess","doi":"10.1007/s11422-022-10117-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In her critical analysis of a popular children’s television show which centers the experiences of a Black girl veterinarian, Sheron Mark finds that although the positioning of these identities illustrates progress vis-à-vis representation, diversity through representation further upholds whiteness. Consequently, to meaningfully engage tenets of diversity and equity in STEM formal and informal learning spaces, the sociocultural contextual factors that account for the systems of power which shape broader ideological perspectives of STEM must be acknowledged. As she calls for such a reckoning within informal and formal STEM spaces, this forum contributes to Mark’s argument by illustrating how the term “equity” is operationalized within current science reform-aligned curricula. Throughout the forum, I provide parallel examples of how such standards which implicate equity function much like diversity, thus maintaining whiteness. Returning to Mark’s charge, this forum concludes with an actionable vision for STEM learning that is truly accommodating of diverse epistemologies and identities in the pursuit of a more equitable STEM experience for youth of color.</p>","PeriodicalId":47132,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies of Science Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies of Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-022-10117-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In her critical analysis of a popular children’s television show which centers the experiences of a Black girl veterinarian, Sheron Mark finds that although the positioning of these identities illustrates progress vis-à-vis representation, diversity through representation further upholds whiteness. Consequently, to meaningfully engage tenets of diversity and equity in STEM formal and informal learning spaces, the sociocultural contextual factors that account for the systems of power which shape broader ideological perspectives of STEM must be acknowledged. As she calls for such a reckoning within informal and formal STEM spaces, this forum contributes to Mark’s argument by illustrating how the term “equity” is operationalized within current science reform-aligned curricula. Throughout the forum, I provide parallel examples of how such standards which implicate equity function much like diversity, thus maintaining whiteness. Returning to Mark’s charge, this forum concludes with an actionable vision for STEM learning that is truly accommodating of diverse epistemologies and identities in the pursuit of a more equitable STEM experience for youth of color.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金无足赤:在科学、技术、工程和数学课程中面对种族中立的多样性和平等观点
雪伦-马克(Sheron Mark)对一部以黑人女孩兽医的经历为中心的热门儿童电视节目进行了批判性分析,她发现,尽管这些身份的定位说明了相对于代表性的进步,但通过代表性实现的多样性进一步维护了白人性。因此,要在 STEM 正规和非正规学习空间中切实贯彻多样性和公平的原则,就必须承认社会文化背景因素对形成 STEM 更广泛意识形态观点的权力系统的影响。马克呼吁在正规和非正规的 STEM 学习空间中进行这样的清算,本论坛通过说明 "公平 "一词在当前科学改革课程中是如何操作的,为马克的论点做出了贡献。在整个论坛中,我提供了一些并行的例子,说明这些涉及公平的标准是如何像多样性一样发挥作用的,从而保持了白人性。回到马克的论点,本论坛最后提出了一个可操作的科学、技术和工程学习愿景,即真正容纳不同的认识论和身份,为有色人种青年提供更加公平的科学、技术和工程学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Cultural Studies of Science Education is a peer reviewed journal that provides an interactive platform for researchers working in the multidisciplinary fields of cultural studies and science education. By taking a cultural approach and paying attention to theories from cultural studies, this new journal reflects the current diversity in the study of science education in a variety of contexts, including schools, museums, zoos, laboratories, parks and gardens, aquariums and community development, maintenance and restoration. This journal focuses on science education as a cultural, cross-age, cross-class, and cross-disciplinary phenomenon; publishes articles that have an explicit and appropriate connection with and immersion in cultural studies; seeks articles that have theory development as an integral aspect of the data presentation; establishes bridges between science education and social studies of science, public understanding of science, science/technology and human values, and science and literacy; builds new communities at the interface of currently distinct discourses; aims to be a catalyst that forges new genres of and for scholarly dissemination; provides an interactive dialogue that includes the editors, members of the review board, and selected international scholars; publishes manuscripts that encompass all forms of scholarly activity; includes research articles, essays, OP-ED, critical, comments, criticisms and letters on emerging issues of significance.
期刊最新文献
STEM learning as care work Languaging-as-practice in science education: an alternative to metaphors of language-as-tool “The joy of being a cause” versus “the pleasure of finding things out”: subalternity and Bildung in higher education engineering and physics How materialities and space–time travellings in class can breathe new life into Swedish secondary school Natural Science sexuality education Communities of practice and the elevation of urban elementary teacher discourse about critical pedagogy of place
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1