Well-being in newly qualified doctors: exploring the value of peer-led reflective sessions

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1136/leader-2023-000917
Christen Van Den Berghe, Yvette Jaffe, Emily Lachmann, Zahra Ladan, Amber Buckland, Sue Laurent, Sarah Needleman, Shanthi Shanmugalingam
{"title":"Well-being in newly qualified doctors: exploring the value of peer-led reflective sessions","authors":"Christen Van Den Berghe, Yvette Jaffe, Emily Lachmann, Zahra Ladan, Amber Buckland, Sue Laurent, Sarah Needleman, Shanthi Shanmugalingam","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Following the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing pressures within the National Health Service, there has been an increasing concern about the well-being of junior doctors in the UK. Newly qualified doctors are particularly vulnerable due to the significant shift in responsibility they experience. Objectives To implement peer-led reflective session for foundation year 1 (FY1) (first-year postgraduation) doctors and to create a dedicated space in which doctors could share difficult or challenging experiences. Methods In 2021 and 2022, peer-led reflective sessions were held for FY1s in a district general hospital in London, England. Feedback assessing well-being, perceived levels of support, as well as session benefits and areas for improvement, was obtained throughout the year. Qualitative feedback underwent thematic analysis to understand key benefits of the sessions. Results Feedback collected at the launch of the initiative revealed that over 80% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their mental health and well-being had been negatively impacted by work. The majority felt additional support was needed. All attendees found reflective sessions useful. Key benefits were as follows: the provision of a safe psychological space, sharing experiences and reflecting with peers, building relationships with colleagues and the reassurance that others struggled with similar challenges. Conclusion FY1 doctors reported that starting work negatively affected their well-being and that additional support was needed. Facilitated peer-led reflective sessions were beneficial and offered a supportive environment for FY1s to share and reflect. We propose the initiative can serve members of the wider healthcare team, including doctors of different grades and nurses. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Following the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing pressures within the National Health Service, there has been an increasing concern about the well-being of junior doctors in the UK. Newly qualified doctors are particularly vulnerable due to the significant shift in responsibility they experience. Objectives To implement peer-led reflective session for foundation year 1 (FY1) (first-year postgraduation) doctors and to create a dedicated space in which doctors could share difficult or challenging experiences. Methods In 2021 and 2022, peer-led reflective sessions were held for FY1s in a district general hospital in London, England. Feedback assessing well-being, perceived levels of support, as well as session benefits and areas for improvement, was obtained throughout the year. Qualitative feedback underwent thematic analysis to understand key benefits of the sessions. Results Feedback collected at the launch of the initiative revealed that over 80% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their mental health and well-being had been negatively impacted by work. The majority felt additional support was needed. All attendees found reflective sessions useful. Key benefits were as follows: the provision of a safe psychological space, sharing experiences and reflecting with peers, building relationships with colleagues and the reassurance that others struggled with similar challenges. Conclusion FY1 doctors reported that starting work negatively affected their well-being and that additional support was needed. Facilitated peer-led reflective sessions were beneficial and offered a supportive environment for FY1s to share and reflect. We propose the initiative can serve members of the wider healthcare team, including doctors of different grades and nurses. Data are available upon reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新晋医生的幸福感:探索同行主导的反思会的价值
导言:在 COVID-19 大流行和国民健康服务的持续压力下,英国初级医生的福祉日益受到关注。由于责任的重大转变,新获得资格的医生尤其容易受到伤害。目标 为基础年一年级(FY1)(毕业后第一年)的医生开展由同伴引导的反思会,并创建一个专门的空间,让医生分享困难或具有挑战性的经历。方法 2021 年和 2022 年,在英国伦敦的一家地区综合医院为一年级学生举办了同伴引导的反思会。我们全年都在收集反馈信息,评估他们的幸福感、所感受到的支持程度,以及反思会的益处和需要改进的地方。对定性反馈进行了主题分析,以了解课程的主要益处。结果 在活动启动时收集的反馈显示,80% 以上的受访者同意或非常同意他们的心理健康和幸福感受到了工作的负面影响。大多数人认为需要额外的支持。所有参加者都认为反思会很有用。主要益处如下:提供了一个安全的心理空间,与同行分享经验和进行反思,与同事建立关系,并确信其他人也在与类似的挑战作斗争。结论 第一年的医生报告说,开始工作对他们的健康产生了负面影响,需要额外的支持。由同伴引导的反思会很有益处,为第一年医生提供了一个分享和反思的支持性环境。我们建议这一举措能够为更广泛的医疗团队成员提供服务,包括不同职级的医生和护士。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Religious identity-based discrimination in the physician workforce: findings from a survey of Muslim physicians in the UK. Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS. Gender disparity in Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding within neurology. Impact of department chair gender on paid parental leave across American anaesthesiology residencies. 'Can you have it all?' Exploring perceived gender roles in leadership through the lens of the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer's clinical fellows 2023/24.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1