Eric HermandURePSSS, H&P, Léo LesaintH&P, Laura DenisH&P, Jean-Paul RichaletINSEP, François LhuissierH&P
{"title":"A Step Test to Evaluate the Susceptibility to Severe High-Altitude Illness in Field Conditions","authors":"Eric HermandURePSSS, H&P, Léo LesaintH&P, Laura DenisH&P, Jean-Paul RichaletINSEP, François LhuissierH&P","doi":"arxiv-2405.01896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A laboratory-based hypoxic exercise test, performed on a cycle ergometer, can\nbe used to predict susceptibility to severe high-altitude illness (SHAI)\nthrough the calculation of a clinicophysiological SHAI score. Our objective was\nto design a field-condition test and compare its derived SHAI score and various\nphysiological parameters, such as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and\ncardiac and ventilatory responses to hypoxia during exercise (HCRe and HVRe,\nrespectively), to the laboratory test. A group of 43 healthy subjects (15\nfemales and 28 males), with no prior experience at high altitude, performed a\nhypoxic cycle ergometer test (simulated altitude of 4,800 m) and step tests (20\ncm high step) at 3,000, 4,000, and 4,800 m simulated altitudes. According to\ntested altitudes, differences were observed in O2 desaturation, heart rate, and\nminute ventilation (p < 0.001), whereas the computed HCRe and HVRe were not\ndifferent (p = 0.075 and p = 0.203, respectively). From the linear\nrelationships between the step test and SHAI scores, we defined a risk zone,\nallowing us to evaluate the risk of developing SHAI and take adequate\npreventive measures in field conditions, from the calculated step test score\nfor the given altitude. The predictive value of this new field test remains to\nbe validated in real high-altitude conditions.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.01896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A laboratory-based hypoxic exercise test, performed on a cycle ergometer, can
be used to predict susceptibility to severe high-altitude illness (SHAI)
through the calculation of a clinicophysiological SHAI score. Our objective was
to design a field-condition test and compare its derived SHAI score and various
physiological parameters, such as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and
cardiac and ventilatory responses to hypoxia during exercise (HCRe and HVRe,
respectively), to the laboratory test. A group of 43 healthy subjects (15
females and 28 males), with no prior experience at high altitude, performed a
hypoxic cycle ergometer test (simulated altitude of 4,800 m) and step tests (20
cm high step) at 3,000, 4,000, and 4,800 m simulated altitudes. According to
tested altitudes, differences were observed in O2 desaturation, heart rate, and
minute ventilation (p < 0.001), whereas the computed HCRe and HVRe were not
different (p = 0.075 and p = 0.203, respectively). From the linear
relationships between the step test and SHAI scores, we defined a risk zone,
allowing us to evaluate the risk of developing SHAI and take adequate
preventive measures in field conditions, from the calculated step test score
for the given altitude. The predictive value of this new field test remains to
be validated in real high-altitude conditions.