A Step Test to Evaluate the Susceptibility to Severe High-Altitude Illness in Field Conditions

Eric HermandURePSSS, H&P, Léo LesaintH&P, Laura DenisH&P, Jean-Paul RichaletINSEP, François LhuissierH&P
{"title":"A Step Test to Evaluate the Susceptibility to Severe High-Altitude Illness in Field Conditions","authors":"Eric HermandURePSSS, H&P, Léo LesaintH&P, Laura DenisH&P, Jean-Paul RichaletINSEP, François LhuissierH&P","doi":"arxiv-2405.01896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A laboratory-based hypoxic exercise test, performed on a cycle ergometer, can\nbe used to predict susceptibility to severe high-altitude illness (SHAI)\nthrough the calculation of a clinicophysiological SHAI score. Our objective was\nto design a field-condition test and compare its derived SHAI score and various\nphysiological parameters, such as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and\ncardiac and ventilatory responses to hypoxia during exercise (HCRe and HVRe,\nrespectively), to the laboratory test. A group of 43 healthy subjects (15\nfemales and 28 males), with no prior experience at high altitude, performed a\nhypoxic cycle ergometer test (simulated altitude of 4,800 m) and step tests (20\ncm high step) at 3,000, 4,000, and 4,800 m simulated altitudes. According to\ntested altitudes, differences were observed in O2 desaturation, heart rate, and\nminute ventilation (p < 0.001), whereas the computed HCRe and HVRe were not\ndifferent (p = 0.075 and p = 0.203, respectively). From the linear\nrelationships between the step test and SHAI scores, we defined a risk zone,\nallowing us to evaluate the risk of developing SHAI and take adequate\npreventive measures in field conditions, from the calculated step test score\nfor the given altitude. The predictive value of this new field test remains to\nbe validated in real high-altitude conditions.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.01896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A laboratory-based hypoxic exercise test, performed on a cycle ergometer, can be used to predict susceptibility to severe high-altitude illness (SHAI) through the calculation of a clinicophysiological SHAI score. Our objective was to design a field-condition test and compare its derived SHAI score and various physiological parameters, such as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and cardiac and ventilatory responses to hypoxia during exercise (HCRe and HVRe, respectively), to the laboratory test. A group of 43 healthy subjects (15 females and 28 males), with no prior experience at high altitude, performed a hypoxic cycle ergometer test (simulated altitude of 4,800 m) and step tests (20 cm high step) at 3,000, 4,000, and 4,800 m simulated altitudes. According to tested altitudes, differences were observed in O2 desaturation, heart rate, and minute ventilation (p < 0.001), whereas the computed HCRe and HVRe were not different (p = 0.075 and p = 0.203, respectively). From the linear relationships between the step test and SHAI scores, we defined a risk zone, allowing us to evaluate the risk of developing SHAI and take adequate preventive measures in field conditions, from the calculated step test score for the given altitude. The predictive value of this new field test remains to be validated in real high-altitude conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在野外条件下评估严重高海拔疾病易感性的步骤测试
在自行车测力计上进行的实验室缺氧运动测试可通过计算临床生理学 SHAI 分数来预测对严重高海拔疾病(SHAI)的易感性。我们的目的是设计一种现场条件测试,并将其得出的 SHAI 评分和各种生理参数(如外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)、运动时心脏和呼吸对缺氧的反应(分别为 HCRe 和 HVRe))与实验室测试进行比较。一组 43 名没有高海拔经验的健康受试者(15 名女性和 28 名男性)分别在模拟海拔 3,000 米、4,000 米和 4,800 米处进行了缺氧循环测力计测试(模拟海拔 4,800 米)和台阶测试(20 厘米高台阶)。根据测试海拔高度,观察到氧气饱和度、心率和分钟通气量存在差异(p < 0.001),而计算得出的 HCRe 和 HVRe 没有差异(分别为 p = 0.075 和 p = 0.203)。根据台阶试验和 SHAI 分数之间的线性关系,我们定义了一个风险区,从而可以根据计算出的特定海拔高度的台阶试验分数,评估罹患 SHAI 的风险,并在野外条件下采取适当的预防措施。这种新的野外测试的预测价值还有待在真实的高海拔条件下进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Validation of a Real-Time Machine Learning-based System for the Detection of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Flow Cytometry Dynamic landscapes and statistical limits on growth during cell fate specification (Un)buckling mechanics of epithelial monolayers under compression On the design and stability of cancer adaptive therapy cycles: deterministic and stochastic models Celcomen: spatial causal disentanglement for single-cell and tissue perturbation modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1