Commonness as a reliable surrogacy strategy for the conservation planning of rare tree species in the subtropical Atlantic Forest

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biodiversity and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1007/s10531-024-02849-2
Guilherme Salgado Grittz, Giesta Maria Olmedo Machado, Alexander Christian Vibrans, André Luís de Gasper
{"title":"Commonness as a reliable surrogacy strategy for the conservation planning of rare tree species in the subtropical Atlantic Forest","authors":"Guilherme Salgado Grittz, Giesta Maria Olmedo Machado, Alexander Christian Vibrans, André Luís de Gasper","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02849-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global biodiversity is declining at rates never seen before. At the same time, resources directed at conservation planning still fall orders of magnitude short. Thus, efficient allocation of resources is needed to prioritize regions that can shelter more biodiversity. A usual approach to identify priority areas for conservation is to map species distribution and use this information as input in spatial prioritization proceedings. Since data on common species are more readily available, final maps of priority areas for conservation are heavily biased towards this group, overlooking rare species. Thus, we created a ranking of priority maps for common and rare tree species, separately, aiming to comprehend if prioritizing areas for the conservation of common trees is enough to protect rare trees all at once. Additionally, we overlapped our priority maps with maps of current protected areas (PAs) to identify if the latter already cover areas designated in our models. Our results show that common tree species can act as surrogates for rare tree species since priority maps for both groups overlap with more than 70% of their area. Yet, most of the current PAs do not cover significant areas for protecting tree species, revealing an urgent need to expand or create new PAs to properly safeguard the local biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02849-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global biodiversity is declining at rates never seen before. At the same time, resources directed at conservation planning still fall orders of magnitude short. Thus, efficient allocation of resources is needed to prioritize regions that can shelter more biodiversity. A usual approach to identify priority areas for conservation is to map species distribution and use this information as input in spatial prioritization proceedings. Since data on common species are more readily available, final maps of priority areas for conservation are heavily biased towards this group, overlooking rare species. Thus, we created a ranking of priority maps for common and rare tree species, separately, aiming to comprehend if prioritizing areas for the conservation of common trees is enough to protect rare trees all at once. Additionally, we overlapped our priority maps with maps of current protected areas (PAs) to identify if the latter already cover areas designated in our models. Our results show that common tree species can act as surrogates for rare tree species since priority maps for both groups overlap with more than 70% of their area. Yet, most of the current PAs do not cover significant areas for protecting tree species, revealing an urgent need to expand or create new PAs to properly safeguard the local biodiversity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同性是亚热带大西洋森林珍稀树种保护规划的可靠代用策略
全球生物多样性正在以前所未有的速度减少。与此同时,用于保护规划的资源仍然远远不够。因此,需要有效地分配资源,优先考虑能够保护更多生物多样性的地区。确定优先保护区域的通常方法是绘制物种分布图,并将这些信息作为空间优先排序程序的输入。由于常见物种的数据更容易获得,因此最终绘制的优先保护区域图会严重偏向这一类物种,而忽略稀有物种。因此,我们为常见树种和珍稀树种分别绘制了优先级排序图,旨在了解优先保护常见树种的区域是否足以同时保护珍稀树种。此外,我们还将优先级地图与当前的保护区地图重叠,以确定后者是否已经覆盖了我们模型中指定的区域。我们的结果表明,普通树种可以作为珍稀树种的替代品,因为这两类树种的优先级地图有 70% 以上的区域重叠。然而,目前大多数保护区并未覆盖保护树种的重要区域,这表明迫切需要扩大或创建新的保护区,以妥善保护当地的生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
期刊最新文献
An assessment of the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and its relationship to Geographical Indications The iconic Jubaea chilensis teeters on the edge of local extinction: a plea for enhanced conservation policies High site fidelity and reduced survival of a mycophagous mammal after prescribed fire An assessment of liverwort richness, endemicity and conservation in a megadiverse country - Colombia Wilderness areas maintain mammal assemblage in subtropical mountain forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1