Experimental and Finite Element Method Investigation of Axial Load Carrying Capacity of Concrete Filled Circular Steel Tube Columns According to Different Slenderness Ratios

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Steel Structures Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1007/s13296-024-00842-7
Fethullah Uslu, Kıvanç Taşkın
{"title":"Experimental and Finite Element Method Investigation of Axial Load Carrying Capacity of Concrete Filled Circular Steel Tube Columns According to Different Slenderness Ratios","authors":"Fethullah Uslu,&nbsp;Kıvanç Taşkın","doi":"10.1007/s13296-024-00842-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, a total of 70 experiment specimens, 56 of circular cross-section concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns and 14 hollow steel tubes with various geometric and material properties, were tested under axial loading. Composite columns with four different concrete compressive strength (<i>f</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>), three different diameter/thickness (<i>D</i>/<i>t</i>) ratio and seven different length/diameter (<i>L</i>/<i>D</i>) ratio used in the experiment samples were designed. The ultimate axial force, axial deformation, and failure modes of the CFST columns obtained from the experiment results were determined. Concrete contribution Ratio index, and strength index were determined from the test results obtained. The ultimate axial force of CFST columns were compared with standards such as AISC360-16 and Eurocode 4. Finally, the finite element (FE) model is proposed to predict the ultimate axial force and behaviour of CFST columns. According to the results obtained, the ultimate axial force of the CFST columns increased as the fc and <i>D</i>/<i>t</i> ratio increased, while the ultimate axial force decreased as the <i>L</i>/<i>D</i> ratio increased. According to the experiment results, it has been seen that the ultimate axial force of the CFST columns is closer to the Eurocode 4 standard. The results obtained from the FE models were calculated on mean 5% more than the experimental results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":596,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Steel Structures","volume":"24 3","pages":"619 - 634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Steel Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13296-024-00842-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a total of 70 experiment specimens, 56 of circular cross-section concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns and 14 hollow steel tubes with various geometric and material properties, were tested under axial loading. Composite columns with four different concrete compressive strength (fc), three different diameter/thickness (D/t) ratio and seven different length/diameter (L/D) ratio used in the experiment samples were designed. The ultimate axial force, axial deformation, and failure modes of the CFST columns obtained from the experiment results were determined. Concrete contribution Ratio index, and strength index were determined from the test results obtained. The ultimate axial force of CFST columns were compared with standards such as AISC360-16 and Eurocode 4. Finally, the finite element (FE) model is proposed to predict the ultimate axial force and behaviour of CFST columns. According to the results obtained, the ultimate axial force of the CFST columns increased as the fc and D/t ratio increased, while the ultimate axial force decreased as the L/D ratio increased. According to the experiment results, it has been seen that the ultimate axial force of the CFST columns is closer to the Eurocode 4 standard. The results obtained from the FE models were calculated on mean 5% more than the experimental results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同纤度比下混凝土填充圆钢管柱轴向承载能力的实验和有限元法研究
本研究共对 70 个实验样本进行了轴向加载测试,其中包括 56 个圆形截面混凝土填充钢管(CFST)柱和 14 个具有不同几何和材料特性的空心钢管。设计了四种不同的混凝土抗压强度(fc)、三种不同的直径/厚度(D/t)比和七种不同的长度/直径(L/D)比的复合柱。根据实验结果确定了 CFST 柱的极限轴力、轴向变形和破坏模式。根据试验结果确定了混凝土贡献率指数和强度指数。CFST 柱的极限轴力与 AISC360-16 和 Eurocode 4 等标准进行了比较。最后,提出了有限元(FE)模型来预测 CFST 柱的极限轴力和行为。根据所得结果,CFST 柱的极限轴力随着 fc 和 D/t 比的增加而增加,而极限轴力随着 L/D 比的增加而减小。根据实验结果,可以看出 CFST 柱的极限轴力更接近于欧洲规范 4 的标准。有限元模型计算得出的结果比实验结果平均高出 5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Steel Structures
International Journal of Steel Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Steel Structures provides an international forum for a broad classification of technical papers in steel structural research and its applications. The journal aims to reach not only researchers, but also practicing engineers. Coverage encompasses such topics as stability, fatigue, non-linear behavior, dynamics, reliability, fire, design codes, computer-aided analysis and design, optimization, expert systems, connections, fabrications, maintenance, bridges, off-shore structures, jetties, stadiums, transmission towers, marine vessels, storage tanks, pressure vessels, aerospace, and pipelines and more.
期刊最新文献
Numerical Investigation and Design of Cold-Formed Steel Channel and Z-Sections Undergoing Local and Global Interactive Buckling Stochastic Robustness of Cable Dome Structures Under Impact Loads Fire Behaviour of Rectangular Steel Tubed-Reinforced-Concrete Columns with End Restraints Finite Element Modeling for Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Stub Columns Under Axial Compression Experimental and Analytical Study on Fire Resistance Performance of Mid-High Rise Modular Rectangular Steel Tube Columns Using a 3 h Fireproof Cladding Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1