Temporal validity reassessment: commonsense reasoning about information obsoleteness

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Retrieval Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1007/s10791-024-09433-w
Taishi Hosokawa, Adam Jatowt, Kazunari Sugiyama
{"title":"Temporal validity reassessment: commonsense reasoning about information obsoleteness","authors":"Taishi Hosokawa, Adam Jatowt, Kazunari Sugiyama","doi":"10.1007/s10791-024-09433-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is useful for machines to know whether text information remains valid or not for various applications including text comprehension, story understanding, temporal information retrieval, and user state tracking on microblogs as well as via chatbot conversations. This kind of inference is still difficult for current models, including also large language models, as it requires temporal commonsense knowledge and reasoning. We approach in this paper the task of Temporal Validity Reassessment, inspired by traditional natural language reasoning to determine the updates of the temporal validity of text content. The task requires judgment whether actions expressed in a sentence are still ongoing or rather completed, hence, whether the sentence still remains valid or has become obsolete, given the presence of context in the form of a supplementary content such as a follow-up sentence. We first construct our own dataset for this task and train several machine learning models. Then we propose an effective method for learning information from an external knowledge base that gives information regarding temporal commonsense knowledge. Using our prepared dataset, we introduce a machine learning model that incorporates the information from the knowledge base and demonstrate that incorporating external knowledge generally improves the results. We also experiment with different embedding types to represent temporal commonsense knowledge as well as with data augmentation methods to increase the size of our dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":54352,"journal":{"name":"Information Retrieval Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Retrieval Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-024-09433-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is useful for machines to know whether text information remains valid or not for various applications including text comprehension, story understanding, temporal information retrieval, and user state tracking on microblogs as well as via chatbot conversations. This kind of inference is still difficult for current models, including also large language models, as it requires temporal commonsense knowledge and reasoning. We approach in this paper the task of Temporal Validity Reassessment, inspired by traditional natural language reasoning to determine the updates of the temporal validity of text content. The task requires judgment whether actions expressed in a sentence are still ongoing or rather completed, hence, whether the sentence still remains valid or has become obsolete, given the presence of context in the form of a supplementary content such as a follow-up sentence. We first construct our own dataset for this task and train several machine learning models. Then we propose an effective method for learning information from an external knowledge base that gives information regarding temporal commonsense knowledge. Using our prepared dataset, we introduce a machine learning model that incorporates the information from the knowledge base and demonstrate that incorporating external knowledge generally improves the results. We also experiment with different embedding types to represent temporal commonsense knowledge as well as with data augmentation methods to increase the size of our dataset.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间有效性再评估:关于信息过时的常识推理
在文本理解、故事理解、时态信息检索、微博用户状态跟踪以及聊天机器人对话等各种应用中,让机器知道文本信息是否仍然有效是非常有用的。对于目前的模型(包括大型语言模型)来说,这种推理仍然很困难,因为它需要时态常识知识和推理。受传统自然语言推理的启发,我们在本文中探讨了 "时间有效性重新评估 "任务,以确定文本内容的时间有效性更新。这项任务要求判断一个句子中表达的行为是仍在进行还是已经完成,因此,考虑到后续句子等补充内容形式的上下文存在,该句子是仍然有效还是已经过时。我们首先为这项任务构建了自己的数据集,并训练了几个机器学习模型。然后,我们提出了一种从外部知识库中学习信息的有效方法,该知识库提供了有关时间常识的信息。利用我们准备好的数据集,我们引入了一个包含知识库信息的机器学习模型,并证明包含外部知识通常会改善结果。我们还尝试使用不同的嵌入类型来表示时态常识知识,并使用数据增强方法来增加数据集的规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Retrieval Journal
Information Retrieval Journal 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The journal provides an international forum for the publication of theory, algorithms, analysis and experiments across the broad area of information retrieval. Topics of interest include search, indexing, analysis, and evaluation for applications such as the web, social and streaming media, recommender systems, and text archives. This includes research on human factors in search, bridging artificial intelligence and information retrieval, and domain-specific search applications.
期刊最新文献
Searching rooms with top-k passenger flows using indoor trajectories An innovative approach for PCO morphology segmentation using a novel MOT-SF technique A graph residual generation network for node classification based on multi-information aggregation Similarity-based ranking of videos from fixed-size one-dimensional video signature The accessibility of digital technologies for people with visual impairment and blindness: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1