Reifying actions into artifacts: process–object duality from an embodied perspective on mathematics learning

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Studies in Mathematics Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s10649-024-10310-y
Anna Shvarts, Rogier Bos, Michiel Doorman, Paul Drijvers
{"title":"Reifying actions into artifacts: process–object duality from an embodied perspective on mathematics learning","authors":"Anna Shvarts, Rogier Bos, Michiel Doorman, Paul Drijvers","doi":"10.1007/s10649-024-10310-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grasping mathematical objects as related to processes is often considered critical for mathematics understanding. Yet, the ontology of mathematical objects remains under debate. In this paper, we theoretically oppose <i>internalist approaches</i> that claim mental entities as the endpoints of process–object transitions and <i>externalist approaches</i> that stress mathematical artifacts—such as physical manipulatives and formulas—as constituting mathematical objects. We search for a view on process–object duality that overcomes the dualism of mind and body. One such approach is commognition that describes mathematical objects as discursive entities. This paper expands the nature of mathematical objects beyond discourse and highlights the role of learners’ interaction with the environment by adopting ecological onto-epistemology. We develop a functional dynamic systems perspective on process–object duality in mathematics learning emphasizing embodied actions and the re-invention of artifacts’ affordances. As a main result, we reconsider process–object duality as a reification of repetitive actions into a cultural artifact that consists of two steps: (1) forming a new sensory-motor coordination that brings new perception to the fore and (2) crystallizing a new artifact in a mathematical environment that captures this new perception. An empirical example from research on embodied action-based design for trigonometry illustrates our theoretical ideas.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":48107,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10310-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grasping mathematical objects as related to processes is often considered critical for mathematics understanding. Yet, the ontology of mathematical objects remains under debate. In this paper, we theoretically oppose internalist approaches that claim mental entities as the endpoints of process–object transitions and externalist approaches that stress mathematical artifacts—such as physical manipulatives and formulas—as constituting mathematical objects. We search for a view on process–object duality that overcomes the dualism of mind and body. One such approach is commognition that describes mathematical objects as discursive entities. This paper expands the nature of mathematical objects beyond discourse and highlights the role of learners’ interaction with the environment by adopting ecological onto-epistemology. We develop a functional dynamic systems perspective on process–object duality in mathematics learning emphasizing embodied actions and the re-invention of artifacts’ affordances. As a main result, we reconsider process–object duality as a reification of repetitive actions into a cultural artifact that consists of two steps: (1) forming a new sensory-motor coordination that brings new perception to the fore and (2) crystallizing a new artifact in a mathematical environment that captures this new perception. An empirical example from research on embodied action-based design for trigonometry illustrates our theoretical ideas.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将行动再造为人工制品:从数学学习的具身视角看过程与对象的二元性
把握与过程相关的数学对象通常被认为是理解数学的关键。然而,数学对象的本体论仍存在争议。在本文中,我们从理论上反对将心理实体作为过程-对象转换终点的内部主义方法,以及强调数学人工制品(如物理操作工具和公式)构成数学对象的外部主义方法。我们正在寻找一种克服身心二元论的过程-对象二元论观点。其中一种方法是将数学对象描述为话语实体的 "认知"(commognition)。本文将数学对象的性质扩展到了话语之外,并通过采用生态上的认识论,强调了学习者与环境互动的作用。我们从功能动态系统的角度来看待数学学习中的过程-对象二元性,强调具身行动和对人工制品能力的再创造。作为一项主要成果,我们将过程-对象二元性重新视为将重复行动重新整合为一种文化人工制品,其中包括两个步骤:(1) 形成新的感官-运动协调,带来新的感知;(2) 在数学环境中结晶出新的人工制品,捕捉这种新的感知。基于行动的三角函数设计研究中的一个经验性实例说明了我们的理论观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Educational Studies in Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Educational Studies in Mathematics presents new ideas and developments of major importance to those working in the field of mathematics education. It seeks to reflect both the variety of research concerns within this field and the range of methods used to study them. It deals with methodological, pedagogical/didactical, political and socio-cultural aspects of teaching and learning of mathematics, rather than with specific programmes for teaching mathematics. Within this range, Educational Studies in Mathematics is open to all research approaches. The emphasis is on high-level articles which are of more than local or national interest.? All contributions to this journal are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Mathematical discussion in classrooms as a technologically-supported activity fostering participation and inclusion Becoming exceptional: the role of capital in the development and mediation of mathematics identity and degree trajectories The emergence of the analytic-structural way of thinking in linear algebra as a blended space Investigating students’ reasoning in generalization of deconstructive figural patterns “I’ll just try to mimic that”: an exploration of students’ analogical structure creation in abstract algebra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1