How does science and technology studies contribute to climate mitigation research? Advanced review of infrastructure as a concept and method

Antti Silvast, Mikko J. Virtanen, Govert Valkenburg, Rico Kongsager
{"title":"How does science and technology studies contribute to climate mitigation research? Advanced review of infrastructure as a concept and method","authors":"Antti Silvast, Mikko J. Virtanen, Govert Valkenburg, Rico Kongsager","doi":"10.1002/wcc.888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to review how Science and Technology Studies (STS) has contributed to climate change mitigation research. We focus on large‐scale infrastructures as a key topic of both mitigation efforts and recent STS scholarship. The paper assesses the conceptual and methodological treatments in this field, uses literature evidence to identify research gaps, and suggests potential topics for future research. Our research firstly contributes to the use of STS approaches in the novel field of climate change mitigation infrastructure, asking how scholarship in the field has learned from STS and developed STS further. Second, we examine how infrastructures are approached in this literature and conclude that the reviewed works almost exclusively associate infrastructure with physical supply systems. This is paradoxical since several of them also advocate a socio‐technical perspective on infrastructures, which would require much more substantiation of the social aspects than they seem to provide. Third, we explore the fits between theoretical frameworks and methods in this field and discover a strong reliance on case studies, literature reviews, and theoretical‐conceptual discussions. This situation suggests that methodological advancements in STS infrastructure studies has still been untapped in this area.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation &gt; Decarbonizing Energy and/or Reducing Demand</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to review how Science and Technology Studies (STS) has contributed to climate change mitigation research. We focus on large‐scale infrastructures as a key topic of both mitigation efforts and recent STS scholarship. The paper assesses the conceptual and methodological treatments in this field, uses literature evidence to identify research gaps, and suggests potential topics for future research. Our research firstly contributes to the use of STS approaches in the novel field of climate change mitigation infrastructure, asking how scholarship in the field has learned from STS and developed STS further. Second, we examine how infrastructures are approached in this literature and conclude that the reviewed works almost exclusively associate infrastructure with physical supply systems. This is paradoxical since several of them also advocate a socio‐technical perspective on infrastructures, which would require much more substantiation of the social aspects than they seem to provide. Third, we explore the fits between theoretical frameworks and methods in this field and discover a strong reliance on case studies, literature reviews, and theoretical‐conceptual discussions. This situation suggests that methodological advancements in STS infrastructure studies has still been untapped in this area.This article is categorized under: The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Decarbonizing Energy and/or Reducing Demand
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学技术研究如何促进气候减缓研究?作为概念和方法的基础设施高级审查
本文旨在回顾科学与技术研究(STS)如何促进气候变化减缓研究。我们将重点放在大型基础设施上,将其视为减缓工作和近期科技研究学术的关键主题。本文评估了这一领域的概念和方法论处理,利用文献证据确定了研究差距,并提出了未来研究的潜在主题。我们的研究首先有助于将 STS 方法应用于气候变化减缓基础设施这一新颖领域,询问该领域的学术研究如何从 STS 中学习并进一步发展 STS。其次,我们研究了这些文献是如何论述基础设施的,并得出结论:所审查的著作几乎都将基础设施与物质供应系统联系在一起。这是很矛盾的,因为其中有几篇还主张从社会技术的角度来看待基础设施,这就需要对社会方面进行更多的论证,而这些论证似乎并没有提供这样的论证。第三,我们探讨了该领域理论框架和方法之间的契合点,发现对案例研究、文献综述和理论概念讨论的依赖性很强。这种情况表明,STS 基础设施研究在方法论上的进步在这一领域仍有待开发:碳经济与气候减缓> 能源去碳化和/或减少需求
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is a New Economic System Necessary to Address Climate Change? Climate Change Cognition, Affect, and Behavior in Youth: A Scoping Review India's Coal Conundrum: Decarbonization Amidst A Developmental Legacy Public Communication of Climate and Justice: A Scoping Review Intergenerational Ethics and Climate Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1