Impact of temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-04-15 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2276-1897
Il Sang Shin, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Jun Ho Myeong, Tae Hoon Lee, Jae Kook Yang, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park
{"title":"Impact of temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Il Sang Shin, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Jun Ho Myeong, Tae Hoon Lee, Jae Kook Yang, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park","doi":"10.1055/a-2276-1897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be an effective palliative treatment, but few studies have evaluated its outcomes for malignant obstruction in the hilar bile duct, which has a thin wall and complex duct-vascular contacts. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA, which can reduce the risk of unintentional thermal injury by maintaining the temperature of the ablation segment, in the treatment of inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). <b>Patients and methods</b> After propensity score matching, 64 patients with inoperable hilar CCA were categorized to the RFA + stent group (endobiliary RFA with stenting; n=32) or stent-only group (stenting only; n=32). The evaluated outcomes were the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). <b>Results</b> Technical success was achieved in all patients. The clinical success rate was 93.8% in the RFA + stent group and 87.5% in the stent-only group ( <i>P</i> =0.672). The median time to RBO was 242 days in the RFA + stent group and 168 days in the stent-only group ( <i>P</i> =0.031). The median OS showed a non-significant tendency to be higher in the RFA + stent group (337 versus 296 days; <i>P</i> =0.260). Overall AE rates were comparable between the two groups (12.5% vs 9.4%, <i>P</i> =1.000). <b>Conclusions</b> Temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA resulted in favorable stent patency without increasing the rate of AEs but it did not significantly increase OS in patients with inoperable hilar CCA (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0008576).</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 4","pages":"E535-E544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2276-1897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be an effective palliative treatment, but few studies have evaluated its outcomes for malignant obstruction in the hilar bile duct, which has a thin wall and complex duct-vascular contacts. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA, which can reduce the risk of unintentional thermal injury by maintaining the temperature of the ablation segment, in the treatment of inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Patients and methods After propensity score matching, 64 patients with inoperable hilar CCA were categorized to the RFA + stent group (endobiliary RFA with stenting; n=32) or stent-only group (stenting only; n=32). The evaluated outcomes were the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Results Technical success was achieved in all patients. The clinical success rate was 93.8% in the RFA + stent group and 87.5% in the stent-only group ( P =0.672). The median time to RBO was 242 days in the RFA + stent group and 168 days in the stent-only group ( P =0.031). The median OS showed a non-significant tendency to be higher in the RFA + stent group (337 versus 296 days; P =0.260). Overall AE rates were comparable between the two groups (12.5% vs 9.4%, P =1.000). Conclusions Temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA resulted in favorable stent patency without increasing the rate of AEs but it did not significantly increase OS in patients with inoperable hilar CCA (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0008576).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
温控胆管射频消融术对无法手术的肝门胆管癌的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
研究背景和目的 胆道内射频消融术(RFA)是一种有效的姑息治疗方法,但很少有研究对其治疗胆道恶性梗阻的疗效进行评估,因为胆道壁较薄、管道与血管接触复杂。我们评估了温控胆道内射频消融术治疗无法手术的肝门胆管癌(CCA)的疗效和安全性,这种方法可以通过保持消融段的温度来降低意外热损伤的风险。患者和方法 经过倾向评分匹配后,64 例无法手术的肝门部 CCA 患者被分为 RFA + 支架组(内胆管 RFA + 支架植入术;32 例)或纯支架组(仅支架植入术;32 例)。评估结果包括复发性胆道梗阻(RBO)的中位时间、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AEs)。结果 所有患者都取得了技术成功。RFA+支架组的临床成功率为93.8%,纯支架组为87.5%(P =0.672)。RFA+支架组的RBO中位时间为242天,纯支架组为168天(P =0.031)。RFA+支架组的中位OS显示出较高的非显著趋势(337天对296天;P =0.260)。两组的总体 AE 发生率相当(12.5% 对 9.4%,P =1.000)。结论 温控胆道内射频消融术可提高支架的通畅率,但不会增加AE的发生率,但也不会显著提高无法手术的肝门部CCA患者的OS(临床试验注册号:KCT0008576)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1