Sedoanalgesia With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: Factors Associated With Unsatisfactory Effectiveness.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003150
Miguel Angel Molina Gutiérrez, María Fernández Camuñas, Jose Antonio Ruíz Domínguez, Marta Bueno Barriocanal, Begoña De Miguel Lavisier, Rosario López López, María de Ceano-Vivas La Calle
{"title":"Sedoanalgesia With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: Factors Associated With Unsatisfactory Effectiveness.","authors":"Miguel Angel Molina Gutiérrez, María Fernández Camuñas, Jose Antonio Ruíz Domínguez, Marta Bueno Barriocanal, Begoña De Miguel Lavisier, Rosario López López, María de Ceano-Vivas La Calle","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ketamine is a safe and widely used sedative and analgesic in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to sedoanalgesia for painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted in children younger than 16 years who underwent painful procedures with intravenous/intranasal ketamine between January 2016 and December 2022. We collected demographic variables, effectiveness, route of administration, indication, dose, sedation strategy, duration of procedure, and associated adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 671 ketamine sedation procedures (411 males/260 females) were included, with a mean age of 7.2 years. Closed reduction was the most common painful procedure (53.8%), followed by burn healing (24.6%). Ketamine was administered intravenously in 93.4% of procedures and intranasally in 6.6%. The result of sedoanalgesia was satisfactory in 84.9% and unsatisfactory in 15.1%. The percentage of cases with unsatisfactory analgesia was higher with intranasal administration (36.4%; P < 0.001). In the intravenous group, the percentage of cases with unsatisfactory effectiveness (28.7%) was higher for patients younger than 2 years of age ( P < 0.001). Arthrocentesis procedures were associated with the highest percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia failures among patients receiving intravenous ketamine (39.3%; P < 0.001). Intranasal ketamine patients who received a dose between 3.6 and 4 mg/kg had a significantly higher percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia (66.7%; P = 0.048). Patients receiving intravenous ketamine had significantly higher rates of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia when the initial dose interval was 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (11.8%; P = 0.002) and when the final total dose was also 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (17.6%; P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concludes that intravenous/intranasal ketamine can provide safe and successful analgesia in pediatric patients in the ED. At intravenous doses of 1-1.5 mg/kg, good effectiveness was achieved in almost 90% of cases. Arthrocentesis had the highest percentage of unsatisfactory results. Repeat dosing should be considered for procedures longer than 20 minutes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ketamine is a safe and widely used sedative and analgesic in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to sedoanalgesia for painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in children younger than 16 years who underwent painful procedures with intravenous/intranasal ketamine between January 2016 and December 2022. We collected demographic variables, effectiveness, route of administration, indication, dose, sedation strategy, duration of procedure, and associated adverse effects.

Results: A total of 671 ketamine sedation procedures (411 males/260 females) were included, with a mean age of 7.2 years. Closed reduction was the most common painful procedure (53.8%), followed by burn healing (24.6%). Ketamine was administered intravenously in 93.4% of procedures and intranasally in 6.6%. The result of sedoanalgesia was satisfactory in 84.9% and unsatisfactory in 15.1%. The percentage of cases with unsatisfactory analgesia was higher with intranasal administration (36.4%; P < 0.001). In the intravenous group, the percentage of cases with unsatisfactory effectiveness (28.7%) was higher for patients younger than 2 years of age ( P < 0.001). Arthrocentesis procedures were associated with the highest percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia failures among patients receiving intravenous ketamine (39.3%; P < 0.001). Intranasal ketamine patients who received a dose between 3.6 and 4 mg/kg had a significantly higher percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia (66.7%; P = 0.048). Patients receiving intravenous ketamine had significantly higher rates of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia when the initial dose interval was 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (11.8%; P = 0.002) and when the final total dose was also 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (17.6%; P = 0.002).

Conclusions: This study concludes that intravenous/intranasal ketamine can provide safe and successful analgesia in pediatric patients in the ED. At intravenous doses of 1-1.5 mg/kg, good effectiveness was achieved in almost 90% of cases. Arthrocentesis had the highest percentage of unsatisfactory results. Repeat dosing should be considered for procedures longer than 20 minutes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科使用氯胺酮镇静:效果不理想的相关因素。
目的:氯胺酮是一种安全且广泛用于儿童的镇静镇痛药。本研究的目的是评估在儿科急诊室进行疼痛手术时对镇静镇痛的反应:方法:我们对2016年1月至2022年12月期间接受静脉/经鼻氯胺酮镇痛手术的16岁以下儿童进行了一项回顾性研究。我们收集了人口统计学变量、有效性、给药途径、适应症、剂量、镇静策略、手术持续时间以及相关不良反应:共纳入 671 例氯胺酮镇静手术(男性 411 例/女性 260 例),平均年龄为 7.2 岁。闭合缩小术是最常见的疼痛手术(53.8%),其次是烧伤愈合(24.6%)。93.4%的手术通过静脉注射氯胺酮,6.6%的手术通过鼻内注射氯胺酮。镇静镇痛效果满意的占 84.9%,不满意的占 15.1%。鼻内给药的镇痛效果不满意的病例比例更高(36.4%;P < 0.001)。在静脉注射组中,镇痛效果不满意的病例比例(28.7%)在两岁以下的患者中更高(P < 0.001)。在接受静脉注射氯胺酮的患者中,关节穿刺术导致镇静镇痛失败的比例最高(39.3%;P < 0.001)。鼻内氯胺酮剂量在3.6至4毫克/千克之间的患者镇静镇痛不满意的比例明显更高(66.7%;P = 0.048)。当初始剂量间隔为1.6至2毫克/千克(11.8%;P = 0.002)和最终总剂量也为1.6至2毫克/千克(17.6%;P = 0.002)时,静脉注射氯胺酮的患者镇静效果不满意的比例明显更高:本研究得出结论,静脉注射/经鼻氯胺酮可为急诊室的儿科患者提供安全、成功的镇痛。静脉注射氯胺酮剂量为1-1.5毫克/千克时,几乎90%的病例都能获得良好的效果。关节穿刺术效果不满意的比例最高。如果手术时间超过 20 分钟,应考虑重复给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Impact of Race on Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in the Emergency Department. Ultrasound Imaging of Various Ingested Foreign Bodies in an Ex Vivo Intestinal Model. Risk of Urinary Tract Infection and Bacteremia in Infants Infected With COVID-19. The Effect of Step Stool Use on Chest Compression Quality During CPR in Young Children: Findings From the Videography in Pediatric Emergency Research (VIPER) Collaborative. Pediatric Off-Road Vehicle Injuries: Side-by-Sides Worse for the Upper Extremity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1