Orthodontic rubber band traction to facilitate endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumor

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Arab Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajg.2024.03.007
{"title":"Orthodontic rubber band traction to facilitate endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumor","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajg.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and study aims</h3><p>Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are common endoscopic minimally invasive methods<span> for treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, it is sometimes difficult to expose the tumor optimally. This study aimed to explore the safety and effectiveness of tumor traction using orthodontic rubber band (ORB) combined with clips to assist ESE and EFTR of gastric SMTs.</span></p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p><span>The data of patients with gastric SMTs who underwent ESE or EFR at the Endoscopy Center of the 900th Hospital of PLA from January 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, including operation time and postoperative </span>adverse events, were compared between patients receiving ORB-ESE/EFTR and conventional ESE/EFTR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 52 patients were enrolled: 16 patients who underwent ORB-ESE /EFTR and 36 patients who underwent conventional ESE/EFTR. Median procedure time was significantly shorter in the ORB-ESE/EFTR group than in the conventional ESE/EFTR group (32 [IQR, 23.8, 38.0] minutes vs. 39.0 [IQR, 34.6–67.3] minutes, <em>P</em> = 0.002). Baseline characteristics, en bloc resection rate, incidence of postoperative adverse events, and postoperative pathology results were comparable between the two groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Use of ORB with clips–assisted traction during ESE/EFTR of gastric SMT can shorten the surgical time. Further large prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48674,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687197924000376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims

Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are common endoscopic minimally invasive methods for treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, it is sometimes difficult to expose the tumor optimally. This study aimed to explore the safety and effectiveness of tumor traction using orthodontic rubber band (ORB) combined with clips to assist ESE and EFTR of gastric SMTs.

Patients and methods

The data of patients with gastric SMTs who underwent ESE or EFR at the Endoscopy Center of the 900th Hospital of PLA from January 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, including operation time and postoperative adverse events, were compared between patients receiving ORB-ESE/EFTR and conventional ESE/EFTR.

Results

A total of 52 patients were enrolled: 16 patients who underwent ORB-ESE /EFTR and 36 patients who underwent conventional ESE/EFTR. Median procedure time was significantly shorter in the ORB-ESE/EFTR group than in the conventional ESE/EFTR group (32 [IQR, 23.8, 38.0] minutes vs. 39.0 [IQR, 34.6–67.3] minutes, P = 0.002). Baseline characteristics, en bloc resection rate, incidence of postoperative adverse events, and postoperative pathology results were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Use of ORB with clips–assisted traction during ESE/EFTR of gastric SMT can shorten the surgical time. Further large prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用正畸橡皮筋牵引促进胃黏膜下肿瘤的内窥镜切除。
背景和研究目的:内镜下黏膜下切除术(ESE)和内镜下全层切除术(EFTR)是治疗胃黏膜下肿瘤(SMT)的常见内镜微创方法。然而,有时很难最佳地暴露肿瘤。本研究旨在探讨使用正畸橡皮筋(ORB)结合夹子进行肿瘤牵引以辅助胃SMTs的ESE和EFTR的安全性和有效性:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年5月期间在中国人民解放军第900医院内镜中心接受ESE或EFR治疗的胃SMT患者的数据。比较了接受ORB-ESE/EFTR和传统ESE/EFTR患者的基线特征和临床结果,包括手术时间和术后不良反应:结果:共有 52 名患者入选:结果:共有52名患者入选:16名患者接受了ORB-ESE/EFTR手术,36名患者接受了传统的ESE/EFTR手术。ORB-ESE/EFTR 组的中位手术时间明显短于传统 ESE/EFTR 组(32 [IQR, 23.8, 38.0] 分钟 vs. 39.0 [IQR, 34.6-67.3] 分钟,P = 0.002)。两组患者的基线特征、全灶切除率、术后不良事件发生率和术后病理结果相当(P > 0.05):结论:在胃SMT的ESE/EFTR手术中使用ORB夹辅助牵引可缩短手术时间。需要进一步的大型前瞻性研究来证实本研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Arab Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) publishes different studies related to the digestive system. It aims to be the foremost scientific peer reviewed journal encompassing diverse studies related to the digestive system and its disorders, and serving the Pan-Arab and wider community working on gastrointestinal disorders.
期刊最新文献
"Mitigating tuberculosis reactivation risk in IBD patients on anti-TNF therapy". Epidemiological and anatomopathological profile of colorectal cancer in Northern Morocco between 2017 and 2019. Ginsenoside Rg3 enhances the anticancer effects of 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer and reduces drug resistance and the Hedgehog pathway activation. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Calcium, and Moringa oleifera leaves extract co-administration can prevent chemical-induced carcinogenesis. Current trends and research hotspots in the study of flavonoids for ulcerative colitis: A bibliometric study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1