Gender Differences in Items of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.

Dementia and neurocognitive disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-12 DOI:10.12779/dnd.2024.23.2.107
Hui Jin Ryu, Yeonsil Moon
{"title":"Gender Differences in Items of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.","authors":"Hui Jin Ryu, Yeonsil Moon","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2024.23.2.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Each item in the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) questionnaire has differential importance to an individual's life functioning based on gender. However, IADL has mostly been utilized for its total score alone, without gender specificity. We identify the impact of each item on the transition from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD), and determine if the impact of each item differs by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were aMCI or ADD with a global clinical dementia rating of 0.5 or 1. The sample size was 146 men and 154 women. We used logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of each item of IADL on the transition from aMCI to ADD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The odds ratio (OR) for \"remembering recent events\" had similar values: 27.2 for men, and 27.7 for women. Gender difference was identified in the item with the highest OR value. For women, the \"using transportation\" item was 63.3, and for men, \"conducting financial affairs\" was overwhelmingly high at 89.1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Functional decline on items with relatively higher ORs may indicate higher probability of a transition from aMCI to ADD. The OR of \"conducting financial affairs\" was relatively higher for both genders. In terms of gender differences, \"conducting home repair\" for men, and \"using transportation\" for women, have relatively higher impact. This study demonstrates that during the transition from aMCI to ADD, each item of IADL shows a staggered decline in functioning, and that this decline is gender-specific.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2024.23.2.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Each item in the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) questionnaire has differential importance to an individual's life functioning based on gender. However, IADL has mostly been utilized for its total score alone, without gender specificity. We identify the impact of each item on the transition from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD), and determine if the impact of each item differs by gender.

Methods: Subjects were aMCI or ADD with a global clinical dementia rating of 0.5 or 1. The sample size was 146 men and 154 women. We used logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of each item of IADL on the transition from aMCI to ADD.

Results: The odds ratio (OR) for "remembering recent events" had similar values: 27.2 for men, and 27.7 for women. Gender difference was identified in the item with the highest OR value. For women, the "using transportation" item was 63.3, and for men, "conducting financial affairs" was overwhelmingly high at 89.1.

Conclusions: Functional decline on items with relatively higher ORs may indicate higher probability of a transition from aMCI to ADD. The OR of "conducting financial affairs" was relatively higher for both genders. In terms of gender differences, "conducting home repair" for men, and "using transportation" for women, have relatively higher impact. This study demonstrates that during the transition from aMCI to ADD, each item of IADL shows a staggered decline in functioning, and that this decline is gender-specific.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症患者日常生活工具性活动项目的性别差异。
背景和目的:日常生活工具性活动(IADL)问卷中的每个项目对个人生活功能的重要性因性别而异。然而,IADL 大多仅以总分计算,没有性别特异性。我们确定了每个项目对从失忆性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)向阿尔茨海默病痴呆(ADD)过渡的影响,并确定每个项目的影响是否因性别而异:受试者为轻度认知障碍(aMCI)或阿尔茨海默病痴呆(ADD),总体临床痴呆评级为 0.5 或 1。样本量为 146 名男性和 154 名女性。我们使用逻辑回归分析来确定 IADL 各项对从 aMCI 向 ADD 过渡的影响:结果:"回忆近期事件 "的几率比(OR)值相似:男性为 27.2,女性为 27.7。性别差异体现在 OR 值最高的项目上。女性在 "使用交通工具 "项目中的比值为 63.3,而男性在 "处理财务事务 "项目中的比值则高达 89.1:在 OR 值相对较高的项目上,功能下降可能表明从 aMCI 过渡到 ADD 的可能性较高。男性和女性 "处理财务 "的 OR 值都相对较高。在性别差异方面,男性的 "进行家庭维修 "和女性的 "使用交通工具 "影响相对较大。这项研究表明,在从 aMCI 向 ADD 过渡的过程中,IADL 的每项功能都会出现交错式下降,而且这种下降是有性别差异的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Item Characteristics and Test Information Between the K-MMSE~2:SV and K-MMSE. Assessing the Impact of Defacing Algorithms on Brain Volumetry Accuracy in MRI Analyses. Discriminative Power of Seoul Cognitive Status Test in Differentiating Subjective Cognitive Decline, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia Based on CERAD-K Standards. Shunt-Responsive Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patient With Parkinson's Disease-Compatible Findings on Dopamine Transporter Scans. Speech Emotion Recognition in People at High Risk of Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1