Japanese General Clinical Oncologists' Knowledge and Real-world Experiences of Cancer Genomic Medicine: A Nationwide Web-based Survey Study.

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JMA journal Pub Date : 2024-04-15 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2023-0187
Ai Unzaki, Kazumi Takahashi, Yuko Ohnuki, Mizuho Yamazaki Suzuki, Kei Takeshita
{"title":"Japanese General Clinical Oncologists' Knowledge and Real-world Experiences of Cancer Genomic Medicine: A Nationwide Web-based Survey Study.","authors":"Ai Unzaki, Kazumi Takahashi, Yuko Ohnuki, Mizuho Yamazaki Suzuki, Kei Takeshita","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2023-0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Japan, insurance began covering two cancer gene panel tests in 2019. However, the availability of these tests remains limited to 247 facilities (as of October 2023). This survey-based study assessed the knowledge and recognition of cancer genomic medicine by physicians involved in cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Written requests for participation in a web-based questionnaire survey were sent to 14,579 affiliated general clinical oncologists certified by the Japanese Board of Cancer Therapy. The survey was conducted from July 1 to 31st, 2021. Data between physicians affiliated with cancer genome hospitals and noncancer genome hospitals and between regions of Japan were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2,402 valid responses were analyzed. Of the respondents, 1,296 and 1,106 were physicians working at cancer and noncancer genome hospitals, respectively. Physicians working at cancer genome hospitals showed significantly higher results for both knowledge of cancer genomic medicine and experience in cancer gene panel test performance compared with those working at noncancer genome hospitals. There were no significant regional differences in the percentage of physicians who reported having performed cancer gene panel tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survey results suggest a disparity in the knowledge of cancer genomic medicine between physicians working at cancer genome hospitals and those working at noncancer genome hospitals; this disparity should be addressed by stakeholders. Closer collaboration between these facilities may be necessary to achieve national dissemination of cancer genomic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11074500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2023-0187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In Japan, insurance began covering two cancer gene panel tests in 2019. However, the availability of these tests remains limited to 247 facilities (as of October 2023). This survey-based study assessed the knowledge and recognition of cancer genomic medicine by physicians involved in cancer treatment.

Methods: Written requests for participation in a web-based questionnaire survey were sent to 14,579 affiliated general clinical oncologists certified by the Japanese Board of Cancer Therapy. The survey was conducted from July 1 to 31st, 2021. Data between physicians affiliated with cancer genome hospitals and noncancer genome hospitals and between regions of Japan were compared.

Results: In total, 2,402 valid responses were analyzed. Of the respondents, 1,296 and 1,106 were physicians working at cancer and noncancer genome hospitals, respectively. Physicians working at cancer genome hospitals showed significantly higher results for both knowledge of cancer genomic medicine and experience in cancer gene panel test performance compared with those working at noncancer genome hospitals. There were no significant regional differences in the percentage of physicians who reported having performed cancer gene panel tests.

Conclusions: The survey results suggest a disparity in the knowledge of cancer genomic medicine between physicians working at cancer genome hospitals and those working at noncancer genome hospitals; this disparity should be addressed by stakeholders. Closer collaboration between these facilities may be necessary to achieve national dissemination of cancer genomic medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本普通临床肿瘤学家对癌症基因组医学的了解和实际经验:一项全国性网络调查研究。
简介在日本,保险从 2019 年开始承保两种癌症基因面板检测。然而,这些检测仍仅限于 247 家机构提供(截至 2023 年 10 月)。这项基于调查的研究评估了参与癌症治疗的医生对癌症基因组医学的了解和认识:向 14,579 名获得日本癌症治疗委员会认证的附属普通临床肿瘤科医生发出了参与网络问卷调查的书面请求。调查时间为 2021 年 7 月 1 日至 31 日。对癌症基因组医院和非癌症基因组医院的附属医生之间以及日本各地区之间的数据进行了比较:共分析了 2,402 份有效答卷。在受访者中,分别有 1,296 名和 1,106 名在癌症基因组医院和非癌症基因组医院工作的医生。与在非癌症基因组医院工作的医生相比,在癌症基因组医院工作的医生在癌症基因组医学知识和癌症基因小组检测经验方面的成绩都明显较高。在报告进行过癌症基因组检测的医生比例方面,没有明显的地区差异:调查结果表明,在癌症基因组医院工作的医生与在非癌症基因组医院工作的医生在癌症基因组医学知识方面存在差距;利益相关者应解决这一差距。要在全国范围内推广癌症基因组医学,这些机构之间必须加强合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of a Huge Iliopsoas Abscess that Perforated and Communicated with the Ureter. Abnormal Splicing Events due to Loss of Nuclear Function of TDP-43: Pathophysiology and Perspectives. An Audience-friendly Medical Meeting: A Good Presentation and Chairpersonship. Assessing the Metabolic and Physical Effects of Combined DPP4 and SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Observational Prospective Pilot Study. Association between Relative Bradycardia and Adult-onset Still Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1