Mengrong Ding , Hailong Liu , Pengfei Lin , Yao Meng , Zipeng Yu
{"title":"Evaluating westward and eastward propagating mesoscale eddies using a 1/10° global ocean simulation of CAS-LICOM3","authors":"Mengrong Ding , Hailong Liu , Pengfei Lin , Yao Meng , Zipeng Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research evaluates the performance of CAS-LICOM3 (Chinese Academy of Science, State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics/Institute of Atmospheric Physics (LASG/IAP) Climate system Ocean Model, version 3) in simulating global coherent mesoscale eddies by comparison to satellite altimeter observations. The simulations of westward and eastward propagating eddies (WPEs and EPEs) and cyclonic and anticyclonic eddies (CEs and AEs) are separately analyzed. The results demonstrate that the simulated spatial-temporal variabilities in global mesoscale eddies agree roughly with the satellite observations. CAS-LICOM3 also reproduces the distinctive features between WPEs and EPEs or between CEs and AEs. However, some systematic biases are found. Globally, CAS-LICOM3 simulates a less frequent and weaker mesoscale eddy field than is observed. WPEs contribute more to these global biases than do EPEs. EPEs are relatively better reproduced than WPEs, exhibiting smaller underestimations and even overestimations in the energetic western boundary current and Antarctic circumpolar current regions. The simulation results for CEs resemble those of AEs, but AEs are comparatively less biased than CEs. These findings provide a basis for improving low-resolution and eddy-resolving ocean general circulation models (OGCMs) and developing submesoscale-resolving OGCMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 102373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146350032400060X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research evaluates the performance of CAS-LICOM3 (Chinese Academy of Science, State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics/Institute of Atmospheric Physics (LASG/IAP) Climate system Ocean Model, version 3) in simulating global coherent mesoscale eddies by comparison to satellite altimeter observations. The simulations of westward and eastward propagating eddies (WPEs and EPEs) and cyclonic and anticyclonic eddies (CEs and AEs) are separately analyzed. The results demonstrate that the simulated spatial-temporal variabilities in global mesoscale eddies agree roughly with the satellite observations. CAS-LICOM3 also reproduces the distinctive features between WPEs and EPEs or between CEs and AEs. However, some systematic biases are found. Globally, CAS-LICOM3 simulates a less frequent and weaker mesoscale eddy field than is observed. WPEs contribute more to these global biases than do EPEs. EPEs are relatively better reproduced than WPEs, exhibiting smaller underestimations and even overestimations in the energetic western boundary current and Antarctic circumpolar current regions. The simulation results for CEs resemble those of AEs, but AEs are comparatively less biased than CEs. These findings provide a basis for improving low-resolution and eddy-resolving ocean general circulation models (OGCMs) and developing submesoscale-resolving OGCMs.
期刊介绍:
The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.