Evaluate Market Potential of an Initial Product Concept With Jobs-to-Be-Done

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting IEEE Engineering Management Review Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1109/EMR.2024.3353618
Philipp Moessner;Raphael Haegle;Larissa Eiler;Kevin Kloepfer
{"title":"Evaluate Market Potential of an Initial Product Concept With Jobs-to-Be-Done","authors":"Philipp Moessner;Raphael Haegle;Larissa Eiler;Kevin Kloepfer","doi":"10.1109/EMR.2024.3353618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many product innovations fail to gain customer acceptance, and the reasons for this can vary. Various instruments, including product roadmaps, market segmentation, requirements engineering, and tender and performance specifications, are typically used to reduce the risk of failure in product development. These methods aim to incorporate and translate various customer requirements into product features. However, the measure of success can often only be observed after the market launch. Until then, a product innovation requires a high expenditure of time and money, which cannot be amortized in case of failure. Therefore, this article presents a methodology for assessing the market potential of product innovations based on the jobs-to-be-done theory. The methodology focuses on evaluating initial existing product concepts to minimize the possibility of product failures and identify them early. For this purpose, it comprises three phases. The first phase focuses on identifying market segments based on jobs and circumstances. In the second phase, stakeholder needs and market potential are linked. In the third phase, the results of phase two are analyzed and elaborated in a 2 × 2 matrix. The methodology was applied in the context of an actual use case of a spraying equipment manufacturer.","PeriodicalId":35585,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","volume":"52 2","pages":"165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10398467/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many product innovations fail to gain customer acceptance, and the reasons for this can vary. Various instruments, including product roadmaps, market segmentation, requirements engineering, and tender and performance specifications, are typically used to reduce the risk of failure in product development. These methods aim to incorporate and translate various customer requirements into product features. However, the measure of success can often only be observed after the market launch. Until then, a product innovation requires a high expenditure of time and money, which cannot be amortized in case of failure. Therefore, this article presents a methodology for assessing the market potential of product innovations based on the jobs-to-be-done theory. The methodology focuses on evaluating initial existing product concepts to minimize the possibility of product failures and identify them early. For this purpose, it comprises three phases. The first phase focuses on identifying market segments based on jobs and circumstances. In the second phase, stakeholder needs and market potential are linked. In the third phase, the results of phase two are analyzed and elaborated in a 2 × 2 matrix. The methodology was applied in the context of an actual use case of a spraying equipment manufacturer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 "待完成工作 "评估初始产品概念的市场潜力
许多产品创新无法获得客户的认可,原因可能各不相同。为了降低产品开发失败的风险,通常会采用各种手段,包括产品路线图、市场细分、需求工程以及投标和性能规格。这些方法旨在将客户的各种要求纳入并转化为产品功能。然而,衡量成功与否的标准往往只能在产品投放市场后才能看到。在此之前,产品创新需要花费大量的时间和金钱,而一旦失败,这些时间和金钱就无法摊销。因此,本文提出了一种基于待完成工作理论的产品创新市场潜力评估方法。该方法侧重于评估最初的现有产品概念,以最大限度地减少产品失败的可能性,并及早发现问题。为此,该方法包括三个阶段。第一阶段的重点是根据工作和环境确定细分市场。在第二阶段,将利益相关者的需求与市场潜力联系起来。在第三阶段,对第二阶段的结果进行分析,并在 2 × 2 矩阵中进行阐述。该方法在一家喷涂设备制造商的实际使用案例中得到了应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Engineering Management Review
IEEE Engineering Management Review Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Reprints articles from other publications of significant interest to members. The papers are aimed at those engaged in managing research, development, or engineering activities. Reprints make it possible for the readers to receive the best of today"s literature without having to subscribe to and read other periodicals.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Front Cover Call for Submissions: IEEE Engineering Management Review Call for Papers: Technology & Engineering Management Conference Series What Drives I4.0 Adoption? Establishing the Importance of Strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1