Evaluation of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block as a predictor for response to ketamine infusion therapy and spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic upper extremity pain.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae038
Jeongsoo Kim, Hangaram Kim, Jae Eun Kim, Yongjae Yoo, Jee Youn Moon
{"title":"Evaluation of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block as a predictor for response to ketamine infusion therapy and spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic upper extremity pain.","authors":"Jeongsoo Kim, Hangaram Kim, Jae Eun Kim, Yongjae Yoo, Jee Youn Moon","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the predictive value of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block (TSGB) in response to ketamine infusion therapy (KIT) and spinal-cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with chronic upper-extremity pain including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospital single-center.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients who underwent TSGB receiving KIT or SCS within a 3-year window.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Positive TSGB outcomes were defined as ≥2 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score reduction at 2 weeks post-procedure. Positive KIT and SCS outcomes were determined by ≥2 NRS score reduction at 2-4 weeks post-KIT and ≥4 NRS score reduction at 2-4 weeks post-SCS implantation, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 207 patients who underwent TSGB, 38 received KIT and 34 underwent SCS implantation within 3 years post-TSGB; 33 patients receiving KIT and 32 patients receiving SCS were included. Among 33 patients who received KIT, 60.6% (n = 20) reported a ≥ 2 0-10 NRS pain-score reduction. Positive response to TSGB occurred in 70.0% (n = 14) KIT responders, significantly higher than that in 30.8% (n = 4) KIT non-responders. Multivariable analysis revealed a positive association between positive responses to TSGB and KIT (OR 7.004, 95% CI 1.26-39.02). Among 32 patients who underwent SCS implantation, 68.8% (n = 22) experienced short-term effectiveness. Positive response to TSGB was significantly higher in SCS responders (45.5%, n = 10) than in non-responders (0.0%). However, there were no associations between pain reduction post-TSGB and that post-KIT or post-SCS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A positive response to TSGB is a potential predictor for positive KIT and SCS outcomes among patients with chronic upper-extremity pain, including CRPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the predictive value of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block (TSGB) in response to ketamine infusion therapy (KIT) and spinal-cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with chronic upper-extremity pain including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Tertiary hospital single-center.

Subjects: Patients who underwent TSGB receiving KIT or SCS within a 3-year window.

Methods: Positive TSGB outcomes were defined as ≥2 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score reduction at 2 weeks post-procedure. Positive KIT and SCS outcomes were determined by ≥2 NRS score reduction at 2-4 weeks post-KIT and ≥4 NRS score reduction at 2-4 weeks post-SCS implantation, respectively.

Results: Among 207 patients who underwent TSGB, 38 received KIT and 34 underwent SCS implantation within 3 years post-TSGB; 33 patients receiving KIT and 32 patients receiving SCS were included. Among 33 patients who received KIT, 60.6% (n = 20) reported a ≥ 2 0-10 NRS pain-score reduction. Positive response to TSGB occurred in 70.0% (n = 14) KIT responders, significantly higher than that in 30.8% (n = 4) KIT non-responders. Multivariable analysis revealed a positive association between positive responses to TSGB and KIT (OR 7.004, 95% CI 1.26-39.02). Among 32 patients who underwent SCS implantation, 68.8% (n = 22) experienced short-term effectiveness. Positive response to TSGB was significantly higher in SCS responders (45.5%, n = 10) than in non-responders (0.0%). However, there were no associations between pain reduction post-TSGB and that post-KIT or post-SCS.

Conclusions: A positive response to TSGB is a potential predictor for positive KIT and SCS outcomes among patients with chronic upper-extremity pain, including CRPS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估胸交感神经节阻滞对慢性上肢疼痛患者氯胺酮输注疗法和脊髓刺激反应的预测作用。
目的研究胸交感神经节阻滞(TSGB)对慢性上肢疼痛(包括复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS))患者氯胺酮输注疗法(KIT)和脊髓刺激(SCS)反应的预测价值:设计:回顾性:受试者:接受TSGB治疗并接受KIT和脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗的患者:方法:TSGB 阳性结果的定义是,患者在接受 KIT 或 SCS 治疗的 3 年时间内,TSGB 的治疗效果良好:TSGB阳性结果定义为术后2周0-10分数值评定量表(NRS)评分减少≥2分。KIT 和 SCS 阳性结果分别以 KIT 术后 2-4 周 NRS 评分降低≥2 分和 SCS 植入术后 2-4 周 NRS 评分降低≥4 分来确定:在207例接受TSGB的患者中,38例接受了KIT,34例在TSGB术后3年内接受了SCS植入;其中33例接受KIT,32例接受SCS。在接受 KIT 的 33 名患者中,60.6%(n = 20)报告 0-10 NRS 疼痛评分降低≥2 分。70.0%(n = 14)的 KIT 反应者对 TSGB 有积极反应,明显高于 30.8%(n = 4)的 KIT 无反应者。多变量分析显示,TSGB 阳性反应与 KIT 呈正相关(OR 7.004,95% CI 1.26-39.02)。在接受 SCS 植入的 32 名患者中,68.8%(n = 22)的患者获得了短期疗效。对 TSGB 有积极反应的 SCS 反应者(45.5%,n = 10)明显高于无反应者(0.0%)。然而,TSGB术后疼痛减轻与KIT术后或SCS术后疼痛减轻之间没有关联:结论:TSGB的阳性反应是慢性上肢疼痛(包括CRPS)患者KIT和SCS阳性结果的潜在预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Case-Based Peer Teaching for Pain Medicine Fellows: A Curriculum for Diverse Residency Backgrounds Exploring new educational approaches in neuropathic pain: Assessing accuracy and consistency of AI responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: Clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Assessment of chronic pain and its association with functional capacity in patients with HTLV-1. Examination of a repaired medial meniscus: ultrasound's forte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1