Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic limited resections of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours of the uncinate process: Report of six cases and review of the literature.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.4103/jmas.jmas_335_23
Teik-Wen Lim, Hwee-Leong Tan, Ek-Khoon Tan, Peng-Chung Cheow, Brian Kim Poh Goh
{"title":"Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic limited resections of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours of the uncinate process: Report of six cases and review of the literature.","authors":"Teik-Wen Lim, Hwee-Leong Tan, Ek-Khoon Tan, Peng-Chung Cheow, Brian Kim Poh Goh","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_335_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for limited resections for pancreatic uncinate lesions is not widely performed but can adequately treat benign or low-grade malignant lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS-limited pancreatic resections for patients with suspected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of six consecutive patients who underwent MIS for PNET within a single institution between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six patients underwent limited pancreas-preserving MIS of the uncinate process (uncinectomy or enucleation), of which two were performed through the robotic approach and four through laparoscopic approach. The median operation time was 212.5 (175-338.75) min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50-112.5) ml. The median post-operative hospital length of stay was 5.5 (3.75-11.5) days. Two patients (33.3%) had major post-operative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade 3). There were no open conversions or post-operative mortalities. Five patients had histologically proven Grade 1 neuroendocrine tumours. One was T2 and four were T1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that limited MIS resections of pancreatic uncinate PNETs are a feasible procedure with good patient outcomes. It offers a safe alternative to radical surgical resections like pancreatoduodenectomies in selected patients with low-grade malignant or benign tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11354958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_335_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for limited resections for pancreatic uncinate lesions is not widely performed but can adequately treat benign or low-grade malignant lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS-limited pancreatic resections for patients with suspected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs).

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study of six consecutive patients who underwent MIS for PNET within a single institution between 2017 and 2022.

Results: Six patients underwent limited pancreas-preserving MIS of the uncinate process (uncinectomy or enucleation), of which two were performed through the robotic approach and four through laparoscopic approach. The median operation time was 212.5 (175-338.75) min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50-112.5) ml. The median post-operative hospital length of stay was 5.5 (3.75-11.5) days. Two patients (33.3%) had major post-operative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade 3). There were no open conversions or post-operative mortalities. Five patients had histologically proven Grade 1 neuroendocrine tumours. One was T2 and four were T1.

Conclusions: This study suggests that limited MIS resections of pancreatic uncinate PNETs are a feasible procedure with good patient outcomes. It offers a safe alternative to radical surgical resections like pancreatoduodenectomies in selected patients with low-grade malignant or benign tumours.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜和机器人胰腺钩突神经内分泌肿瘤局限性切除术的短期疗效:六例病例报告和文献综述。
导言:微创手术(MIS)用于胰腺未端病变的局限性切除并不广泛,但可充分治疗良性或低度恶性病变。本研究旨在评估对疑似胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNET)患者进行胰腺MIS局限性切除术的短期疗效:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2017年至2022年间在一家机构内接受MIS治疗PNET的6名连续患者:6名患者接受了钩突局限性保胰MIS手术(钩突切除术或去核术),其中2名患者通过机器人方法进行了手术,4名患者通过腹腔镜方法进行了手术。中位手术时间为212.5(175-338.75)分钟,中位失血量为50(50-112.5)毫升。术后住院时间中位数为 5.5(3.75-11.5)天。两名患者(33.3%)术后出现了严重的并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥3级)。无开腹手术转换或术后死亡病例。五名患者经组织学证实患有1级神经内分泌肿瘤。结论:这项研究表明,胰腺钩端 PNET 的有限 MIS 切除术是一种可行的手术,患者疗效良好。它为经过选择的低度恶性或良性肿瘤患者提供了胰十二指肠切除术等根治性手术的安全替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
A case series analysis of spigelian hernia: A diagnostic dilemma and its successful laparoscopic repair. Giant left spontaneous diaphragmatic hernia repair via combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches. Glanzmann's thrombasthenia: A nightmare for hernia surgeons. Impact of uterine weight on surgical outcomes in robotic hysterectomy: An ambispective analysis. Initial experience of SSI Mantra robot-assisted Transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair of primary ventral hernias.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1