Long-Term Outcomes of Recipients of Liver Transplants from Living Donors Treated with a Very Low-Calorie Diet.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-05-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/9024204
Hannah Wozniak, Sara Naimimohasses, Toru Goto, Gonzalo Sapisochin, Blayne Sayed, Anand Ghanekar, Mark Cattral, Nazia Selzner
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Recipients of Liver Transplants from Living Donors Treated with a Very Low-Calorie Diet.","authors":"Hannah Wozniak, Sara Naimimohasses, Toru Goto, Gonzalo Sapisochin, Blayne Sayed, Anand Ghanekar, Mark Cattral, Nazia Selzner","doi":"10.1155/2024/9024204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing prevalence of steatotic liver disease (SLD) in potential living donors is concerning, as it limits donor's availability amid rising demand. OPTIFAST very low-calorie diet (VLCD), a meal replacement product, effectively reduces weight and hepatic steatosis before transplantation. However, data on the outcomes of recipients of VLCD-treated donors are lacking. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study on 199 living donor liver transplant recipients at Toronto General Hospital, Canada, between January 2015 and January 2020. We compared the 1-year posttransplant outcomes between recipients who received organs from donors treated with VLCD (<i>N</i> = 34) for either weight loss or steatosis reduction, with those who did not require treatment (<i>N</i> = 165). Our analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications (23% vs 32.4%, <i>p</i>=0.3) or intensive care unit stays (70.9% vs 70.6%, <i>p</i>=1) between recipients of non-VLCD and VLCD grafts. Following adjusted multivariate logistic regression, receipt of VLCD grafts was not associated with increased hospital length of stay. In addition, one-year mortality did not differ between the two groups (4.2% non-VLCD recipients vs 2.9% VLCD recipients, <i>p</i>=0.6). OPTIFAST VLCD treatment for liver donors demonstrates positive and safe outcomes in recipients, expanding the pool of potential living donors for increased organ availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9024204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of steatotic liver disease (SLD) in potential living donors is concerning, as it limits donor's availability amid rising demand. OPTIFAST very low-calorie diet (VLCD), a meal replacement product, effectively reduces weight and hepatic steatosis before transplantation. However, data on the outcomes of recipients of VLCD-treated donors are lacking. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study on 199 living donor liver transplant recipients at Toronto General Hospital, Canada, between January 2015 and January 2020. We compared the 1-year posttransplant outcomes between recipients who received organs from donors treated with VLCD (N = 34) for either weight loss or steatosis reduction, with those who did not require treatment (N = 165). Our analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications (23% vs 32.4%, p=0.3) or intensive care unit stays (70.9% vs 70.6%, p=1) between recipients of non-VLCD and VLCD grafts. Following adjusted multivariate logistic regression, receipt of VLCD grafts was not associated with increased hospital length of stay. In addition, one-year mortality did not differ between the two groups (4.2% non-VLCD recipients vs 2.9% VLCD recipients, p=0.6). OPTIFAST VLCD treatment for liver donors demonstrates positive and safe outcomes in recipients, expanding the pool of potential living donors for increased organ availability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受极低热量饮食治疗的活体肝移植受体的长期疗效。
潜在活体捐献者中脂肪性肝病(SLD)的发病率越来越高,这令人担忧,因为在需求不断增加的情况下,这限制了捐献者的可用性。OPTIFAST 极低热量饮食(VLCD)是一种代餐产品,能在移植前有效减轻体重和肝脏脂肪变性。然而,目前还缺乏有关经 VLCD 治疗的供体的受体预后的数据。我们在 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间对加拿大多伦多总医院的 199 名活体肝移植受者进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。我们比较了接受 VLCD 治疗以减轻体重或减少脂肪变性的供体器官的受者(34 人)与不需要治疗的受者(165 人)移植后 1 年的结果。我们的分析表明,非 VLCD 移植物和 VLCD 移植物的受者在术后并发症发生率(23% vs 32.4%,P=0.3)或重症监护室住院时间(70.9% vs 70.6%,P=1)方面没有明显的统计学差异。经过调整的多变量逻辑回归结果显示,接受 VLCD 移植物与住院时间的延长无关。此外,两组患者的一年死亡率也没有差异(非 VLCD 移植物患者为 4.2% vs VLCD 移植物患者为 2.9%,P=0.6)。对肝脏捐献者进行OPTIFAST VLCD治疗可为受者带来积极而安全的结果,扩大了潜在的活体捐献者库,从而增加了器官的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pneumatosis Intestinalis and Pneumoperitoneum After Lung Transplantation: Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review. Hepatic Duct Division During Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Comparison Between the Novel Triple C (Clip-Clamp-Cut) and the Cut-Suture Techniques. Psychosocial Trauma History Negatively Impacts Liver Transplant Access in Women with Chronic Liver Disease. Long-Term Outcomes of Recipients of Liver Transplants from Living Donors Treated with a Very Low-Calorie Diet. Addressing Kidney Transplant Shortage: The Potential of Kidney Paired Exchanges in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1