Comparison of the effect of A-PRF and L-PRF application to palatal donor sites on quality of life and wound healing after free gingival graft surgery.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Quintessence international Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b5316947

Ariz Mutallibli, Mehmet Sağlam

{"title":"Comparison of the effect of A-PRF and L-PRF application to palatal donor sites on quality of life and wound healing after free gingival graft surgery.","authors":"Ariz Mutallibli, Mehmet Sağlam","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5316947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study compared the effects of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) on patients' quality of life and the healing of palatal wounds after free gingival graft harvesting.Method and materials: After free gingival graft harvesting, palatal donor sites of 36 patients were assigned to one of three groups: L-PRF group, A-PRF group, or palatal stent + periodontal pack group (control group). Wound healing was evaluated by H2O2 test. Pain was evaluated by visual analog scale and number of analgesics consumed. For patient quality of life, the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was utilized.Results: Complete epithelialization was higher in the control group on day 7 than in the test groups (P < .05). Complete epithelialization was achieved in all groups 14 days postoperatively. Visual analog scale scores for pain and the number of analgesic tablets consumed were similar in all groups (P > .05). OHIP-14 total scores were similar in all study groups at 7 days postoperatively (P > .05). OHIP-14 total and physical pain score was lower in the L-PRF group than the A-PRF group at 14 days postoperatively (P < .05).Conclusion: Aside from the slight superiority of L-PRF over A-PRF, it can be concluded that both PRF procedures have similar effects on palatal wound healing and quality of life.","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"472-481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5316947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the effects of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) on patients' quality of life and the healing of palatal wounds after free gingival graft harvesting.

Method and materials: After free gingival graft harvesting, palatal donor sites of 36 patients were assigned to one of three groups: L-PRF group, A-PRF group, or palatal stent + periodontal pack group (control group). Wound healing was evaluated by H2O2 test. Pain was evaluated by visual analog scale and number of analgesics consumed. For patient quality of life, the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was utilized.

Results: Complete epithelialization was higher in the control group on day 7 than in the test groups (P < .05). Complete epithelialization was achieved in all groups 14 days postoperatively. Visual analog scale scores for pain and the number of analgesic tablets consumed were similar in all groups (P > .05). OHIP-14 total scores were similar in all study groups at 7 days postoperatively (P > .05). OHIP-14 total and physical pain score was lower in the L-PRF group than the A-PRF group at 14 days postoperatively (P < .05).

Conclusion: Aside from the slight superiority of L-PRF over A-PRF, it can be concluded that both PRF procedures have similar effects on palatal wound healing and quality of life.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

比较在腭供体部位应用 A-PRF 和 L-PRF 对游离牙龈移植手术后生活质量和伤口愈合的影响。

研究目的本研究比较了L-PRF和A-PRF对患者生活质量和游离龈移植术后腭部伤口愈合的影响：在游离龈移植术后，将36名患者的腭供体部位分为三组：1）L-PRF 组；2）A-PRF 组；3）腭支架+牙周袋组（对照组）。疼痛通过视觉模拟量表（VAS）和止痛药用量进行评估。患者的生活质量采用口腔健康影响档案-14（OHIP-14）问卷调查：结果：对照组在第 7 天的上皮完全脱落率高于试验组（P< 0.05）。所有试验组在术后第 14 天均实现了完全上皮化。各组的疼痛 VAS 评分和镇痛药用量相似（P>0.05）。术后第 7 天，所有研究组的 OHIP-14 总分相似（P>0.05）。术后第 14 天，L-PRF 组的 OHIP-14 总分和躯体疼痛评分低于 A-PRF 组（P< 0.05）：除了 L-PRF 略优于 A-PRF 外，两种 PRF 术式对腭部伤口愈合和生活质量的影响相似。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.