Impact of the width and shape of the sliding board on design evaluation.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1080/10400435.2024.2340669
Ryuji Katamoto, Masami Komiya, Yuto Ariji, Kenji Iwahashi, Yoshiteru Terashi, Hiromitsu Kobayashi, Yoshito Ehara, Tetsuo Hayashi
{"title":"Impact of the width and shape of the sliding board on design evaluation.","authors":"Ryuji Katamoto, Masami Komiya, Yuto Ariji, Kenji Iwahashi, Yoshiteru Terashi, Hiromitsu Kobayashi, Yoshito Ehara, Tetsuo Hayashi","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2024.2340669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate how width affects the design evaluation of sliding boards with a new shape. Ten caregivers at a senior facility evaluated five types of boards every two weeks. The new shape board received high ratings as the width increased, with a SUS (System Usability Scale) score of 68.5 points (95% CI 60.6-76.4). Compared to the traditional rectangular board, which had a width of 250 mm and a thickness of 5 mm, the new shape board (with a central width of 163 mm and a thickness of 8 mm) received higher ratings by 0.68 points (95% CI 0.31-1.05)using a paired comparison method. The results of a quantitative study on the usability of sliding boards from the perspective of caregivers indicated that for similar board shapes with a length of 650 mm and a thickness of 8 mm, the evaluation increases as the width increases in the range of 130 mm to 163 mm at the center.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2024.2340669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how width affects the design evaluation of sliding boards with a new shape. Ten caregivers at a senior facility evaluated five types of boards every two weeks. The new shape board received high ratings as the width increased, with a SUS (System Usability Scale) score of 68.5 points (95% CI 60.6-76.4). Compared to the traditional rectangular board, which had a width of 250 mm and a thickness of 5 mm, the new shape board (with a central width of 163 mm and a thickness of 8 mm) received higher ratings by 0.68 points (95% CI 0.31-1.05)using a paired comparison method. The results of a quantitative study on the usability of sliding boards from the perspective of caregivers indicated that for similar board shapes with a length of 650 mm and a thickness of 8 mm, the evaluation increases as the width increases in the range of 130 mm to 163 mm at the center.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滑动板的宽度和形状对设计评估的影响。
本研究旨在调查宽度如何影响对新形状滑板的设计评估。一家养老机构的十名护理人员每两周对五种滑板进行一次评估。随着宽度的增加,新形状的滑板获得了较高的评价,SUS(系统可用性量表)得分为 68.5 分(95% CI 60.6-76.4)。通过配对比较法,与宽度为 250 毫米、厚度为 5 毫米的传统矩形板相比,新形状板(中心宽度为 163 毫米、厚度为 8 毫米)的评分高出 0.68 分(95% CI 0.31-1.05)。从护理人员的角度对滑动板的可用性进行定量研究的结果表明,对于长度为 650 毫米、厚度为 8 毫米的类似形状的滑动板,随着中心宽度在 130 毫米至 163 毫米范围内的增加,评价也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
期刊最新文献
Power assist add-ons for adult manual wheelchair users: A scoping review. Ultralight wheelchair part failures are associated with sensor-monitored road shocks: A pilot study. International Society of Wheelchair Professionals' Basic Manual Wheelchair Service Provision Knowledge Test Version 2: Assessment of preliminary psychometric evidence. A hierarchy category of socially assistive robots' functions: Insights from older adults. Wheelchair users function and satisfaction with modified wheelchair and intermediate wheelchair services in Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1