Assessment of pulmonary vascular anatomy: comparing augmented reality by holograms versus standard CT images/reconstructions using surgical findings as reference standard.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00458-w
Francesco Petrella, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Cristiano Rampinelli, Monica Casiraghi, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Samuele Frassoni, Silvia Pozzi, Omar Pappalardo, Gabriella Pravettoni, Lorenzo Spaggiari
{"title":"Assessment of pulmonary vascular anatomy: comparing augmented reality by holograms versus standard CT images/reconstructions using surgical findings as reference standard.","authors":"Francesco Petrella, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Cristiano Rampinelli, Monica Casiraghi, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Samuele Frassoni, Silvia Pozzi, Omar Pappalardo, Gabriella Pravettoni, Lorenzo Spaggiari","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00458-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We compared computed tomography (CT) images and holograms (HG) to assess the number of arteries of the lung lobes undergoing lobectomy and assessed easiness in interpretation by radiologists and thoracic surgeons with both techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for lobectomy for lung cancer were prospectively included and underwent CT for staging. A patient-specific three-dimensional model was generated and visualized in an augmented reality setting. One radiologist and one thoracic surgeon evaluated CT images and holograms to count lobar arteries, having as reference standard the number of arteries recorded at surgery. The easiness of vessel identification was graded according to a Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and κ statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients were prospectively included. The two doctors detected the same number of arteries in 44/52 images (85%) and in 51/52 holograms (98%). The mean difference between the number of artery branches detected by surgery and CT images was 0.31 ± 0.98, whereas it was 0.09 ± 0.37 between surgery and HGs (p = 0.433). In particular, the mean difference in the number of arteries detected in the upper lobes was 0.67 ± 1.08 between surgery and CT images and 0.17 ± 0.46 between surgery and holograms (p = 0.029). Both radiologist and surgeon showed a higher agreement for holograms (κ = 0.99) than for CT (κ = 0.81) and found holograms easier to evaluate than CTs (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Augmented reality by holograms is an effective tool for preoperative vascular anatomy assessment of lungs, especially when evaluating the upper lobes, more prone to anatomical variations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04227444 RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Preoperative evaluation of the lung lobe arteries through augmented reality may help the thoracic surgeons to carefully plan a lobectomy, thus contributing to optimize patients' outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• Preoperative assessment of the lung arteries may help surgical planning. • Lung artery detection by augmented reality was more accurate than that by CT images, particularly for the upper lobes. • The assessment of the lung arterial vessels was easier by using holograms than CT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11082107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00458-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We compared computed tomography (CT) images and holograms (HG) to assess the number of arteries of the lung lobes undergoing lobectomy and assessed easiness in interpretation by radiologists and thoracic surgeons with both techniques.

Methods: Patients scheduled for lobectomy for lung cancer were prospectively included and underwent CT for staging. A patient-specific three-dimensional model was generated and visualized in an augmented reality setting. One radiologist and one thoracic surgeon evaluated CT images and holograms to count lobar arteries, having as reference standard the number of arteries recorded at surgery. The easiness of vessel identification was graded according to a Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and κ statistics were used.

Results: Fifty-two patients were prospectively included. The two doctors detected the same number of arteries in 44/52 images (85%) and in 51/52 holograms (98%). The mean difference between the number of artery branches detected by surgery and CT images was 0.31 ± 0.98, whereas it was 0.09 ± 0.37 between surgery and HGs (p = 0.433). In particular, the mean difference in the number of arteries detected in the upper lobes was 0.67 ± 1.08 between surgery and CT images and 0.17 ± 0.46 between surgery and holograms (p = 0.029). Both radiologist and surgeon showed a higher agreement for holograms (κ = 0.99) than for CT (κ = 0.81) and found holograms easier to evaluate than CTs (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Augmented reality by holograms is an effective tool for preoperative vascular anatomy assessment of lungs, especially when evaluating the upper lobes, more prone to anatomical variations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04227444 RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Preoperative evaluation of the lung lobe arteries through augmented reality may help the thoracic surgeons to carefully plan a lobectomy, thus contributing to optimize patients' outcomes.

Key points: • Preoperative assessment of the lung arteries may help surgical planning. • Lung artery detection by augmented reality was more accurate than that by CT images, particularly for the upper lobes. • The assessment of the lung arterial vessels was easier by using holograms than CT images.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺血管解剖学评估:全息图增强现实技术与以手术结果为参考标准的标准 CT 图像/重建技术的比较。
背景:我们比较了计算机断层扫描(CT)图像和全息图像(HG),以评估进行肺叶切除术的肺叶动脉数量,并评估放射科医生和胸外科医生使用这两种技术判读的简易程度:方法:前瞻性地纳入计划进行肺叶切除术的肺癌患者,并对其进行CT分期。在增强现实环境中生成并可视化患者特定的三维模型。一名放射科医生和一名胸外科医生对 CT 图像和全息图像进行了评估,以手术时记录的动脉数量作为参考标准,对肺叶动脉进行计数。血管识别的难易程度根据李克特量表进行评分。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和κ统计:结果:52 名患者被纳入前瞻性研究。两位医生在 44/52 张图像(85%)和 51/52 张全息图像(98%)中检测到的动脉数量相同。手术和 CT 图像检测到的动脉分支数量的平均差异为 0.31 ± 0.98,而手术和 HGs 检测到的动脉分支数量的平均差异为 0.09 ± 0.37(P = 0.433)。特别是,手术和 CT 图像检测到的上叶动脉数量的平均差异为 0.67 ± 1.08,手术和全息图像检测到的上叶动脉数量的平均差异为 0.17 ± 0.46(p = 0.029)。放射科医生和外科医生对全息图像(κ = 0.99)的一致性高于 CT 图像(κ = 0.81),并认为全息图像比 CT 图像更容易评估(p < 0.001):全息图增强现实技术是术前评估肺血管解剖的有效工具,尤其是在评估上叶时,因为上叶更容易出现解剖变异:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04227444 相关声明:通过增强现实技术对肺叶动脉进行术前评估可帮助胸外科医生仔细规划肺叶切除术,从而有助于优化患者的预后:- 要点:术前评估肺动脉有助于制定手术计划。- 用增强现实技术检测肺动脉比用CT图像更准确,尤其是上肺叶。- 使用全息图像比 CT 图像更容易评估肺动脉血管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
An AI deep learning algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose CT in an emergency setting: a reader study. Evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure, blood indices, and myocardial microcirculation in rats returning from high altitude to moderate altitude. Image biomarkers and explainable AI: handcrafted features versus deep learned features. Technical feasibility of automated blur detection in digital mammography using convolutional neural network. Quantification of breast biopsy clip marker artifact on routine breast MRI sequences: a phantom study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1