High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation as Initial Treatment in Acute Hypoxia: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-05-08 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001092
Elizabeth S Munroe, Ina Prevalska, Madison Hyer, William J Meurer, Jarrod M Mosier, Mark A Tidswell, Hallie C Prescott, Lai Wei, Henry Wang, Christopher M Fung
{"title":"High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation as Initial Treatment in Acute Hypoxia: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Elizabeth S Munroe, Ina Prevalska, Madison Hyer, William J Meurer, Jarrod M Mosier, Mark A Tidswell, Hallie C Prescott, Lai Wei, Henry Wang, Christopher M Fung","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hypoxemia often have mixed or uncertain causes of respiratory failure. The optimal treatment for such patients is unclear. Both high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are used.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to compare the effectiveness of initial treatment with HFNC versus NIV for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with HFNC or NIV within 24 hours of arrival to the University of Michigan adult ED from January 2018 to December 2022. We matched patients 1:1 using a propensity score for odds of receiving NIV.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was major adverse pulmonary events (28-d mortality, ventilator-free days, noninvasive respiratory support hours) calculated using a win ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1154 patients were included. Seven hundred twenty-six (62.9%) received HFNC and 428 (37.1%) received NIV. We propensity score matched 668 of 1154 (57.9%) patients. Patients on NIV versus HFNC had lower 28-day mortality (16.5% vs. 23.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and required noninvasive treatment for fewer hours (median 7.5 vs. 13.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but had no difference in ventilator-free days (median [interquartile range]: 28 [26, 28] vs. 28 [10.5, 28], <i>p</i> = 0.199). Win ratio for composite major adverse pulmonary events favored NIV (1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.65; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this observational study of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, initial treatment with NIV compared with HFNC was associated with lower mortality and fewer composite major pulmonary adverse events calculated using a win ratio. These findings underscore the need for randomized controlled trials to further understand the impact of noninvasive respiratory support strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hypoxemia often have mixed or uncertain causes of respiratory failure. The optimal treatment for such patients is unclear. Both high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are used.

Objectives: We sought to compare the effectiveness of initial treatment with HFNC versus NIV for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Design setting and participants: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with HFNC or NIV within 24 hours of arrival to the University of Michigan adult ED from January 2018 to December 2022. We matched patients 1:1 using a propensity score for odds of receiving NIV.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was major adverse pulmonary events (28-d mortality, ventilator-free days, noninvasive respiratory support hours) calculated using a win ratio.

Results: A total of 1154 patients were included. Seven hundred twenty-six (62.9%) received HFNC and 428 (37.1%) received NIV. We propensity score matched 668 of 1154 (57.9%) patients. Patients on NIV versus HFNC had lower 28-day mortality (16.5% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.033) and required noninvasive treatment for fewer hours (median 7.5 vs. 13.5, p < 0.001), but had no difference in ventilator-free days (median [interquartile range]: 28 [26, 28] vs. 28 [10.5, 28], p = 0.199). Win ratio for composite major adverse pulmonary events favored NIV (1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.65; p < 0.001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this observational study of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, initial treatment with NIV compared with HFNC was associated with lower mortality and fewer composite major pulmonary adverse events calculated using a win ratio. These findings underscore the need for randomized controlled trials to further understand the impact of noninvasive respiratory support strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高流量鼻导管与无创通气作为急性缺氧的初始治疗方法:倾向评分匹配研究。
重要性:因低氧血症到急诊科(ED)就诊的患者通常有混合或不确定的呼吸衰竭原因。此类患者的最佳治疗方法尚不明确。高流量鼻插管(HFNC)和无创通气(NIV)均可使用:我们试图比较高流量鼻插管与无创通气对急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭的初始治疗效果:我们对 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间抵达密歇根大学成人急诊室 24 小时内接受 HFNC 或 NIV 治疗的急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们使用倾向评分对患者接受 NIV 的几率进行了 1:1 匹配:主要结果为主要肺部不良事件(28 天死亡率、无呼吸机天数、无创呼吸支持小时数),采用胜率计算:共纳入 1154 名患者。其中 726 人(62.9%)接受了高频NC,428 人(37.1%)接受了 NIV。我们对 1154 例患者中的 668 例(57.9%)进行了倾向评分匹配。NIV 与 HFNC 患者的 28 天死亡率较低(16.5% vs. 23.4%,p = 0.033),需要无创治疗的时间较少(中位数 7.5 vs. 13.5,p < 0.001),但无呼吸机天数没有差异(中位数[四分位间范围]:28 [26, 28] vs. 28 [10.5, 28],p = 0.199)。综合主要肺部不良事件的Win ratio倾向于NIV(1.38;95% CI,1.15-1.65;P < 0.001):在这项针对急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭患者的观察性研究中,与高频NC相比,NIV的初始治疗与较低的死亡率和较少的综合主要肺部不良事件相关。这些发现强调了进行随机对照试验的必要性,以进一步了解无创呼吸支持策略的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Statistical Power and Performance of Strategies to Analyze Composites of Survival and Duration of Ventilation in Clinical Trials. Erratum: Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum. Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum. Characterizing the Use of Time-Limited Trials in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective, Single-Center Observational Study. Utility of Skin Tone on Pulse Oximetry in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1