Seeing to understand better? The interplay between cognitive traits and nonverbal visual cues in L2 video comprehension

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH System Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.system.2024.103328
Yeu-Ting Liu , Wen-Ta Tseng
{"title":"Seeing to understand better? The interplay between cognitive traits and nonverbal visual cues in L2 video comprehension","authors":"Yeu-Ting Liu ,&nbsp;Wen-Ta Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study delves into the relationship between the cognitive traits of L2 learners and nonverbal visual scaffolds, specifically beat gestures and facial articulatory features, embedded in training materials. These scaffolds have been proven to enhance L1 comprehension. The research further investigates how this relationship impacts the effects of these scaffolds on learners' comprehension performance post-training. For this purpose, the study recruited 120 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners aged 20–24, all at the B2 level of English proficiency, for a 4-week hybrid instructional period. The findings suggest that working memory (WM) plays a significant role in L2 learners' processing of nonverbal visual cues. High-WM learners showed improved comprehension with facial cues, while low-WM individuals leaned towards treatments with fewer nonverbal cues. Additionally, learners’ modality preferences were pivotal for their comprehension. Auditory verbalizers—those who prefer spoken texts—favored treatments emphasizing auditory elements. In contrast, textual verbalizers—those inclined towards written texts and with high working memory—benefited more from exposure to rich nonverbal cues. This study highlights the importance of a balanced instructional strategy that integrates both verbal and nonverbal cues, tailored specifically for learners with distinct cognitive traits and preferences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103328"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24001106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into the relationship between the cognitive traits of L2 learners and nonverbal visual scaffolds, specifically beat gestures and facial articulatory features, embedded in training materials. These scaffolds have been proven to enhance L1 comprehension. The research further investigates how this relationship impacts the effects of these scaffolds on learners' comprehension performance post-training. For this purpose, the study recruited 120 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners aged 20–24, all at the B2 level of English proficiency, for a 4-week hybrid instructional period. The findings suggest that working memory (WM) plays a significant role in L2 learners' processing of nonverbal visual cues. High-WM learners showed improved comprehension with facial cues, while low-WM individuals leaned towards treatments with fewer nonverbal cues. Additionally, learners’ modality preferences were pivotal for their comprehension. Auditory verbalizers—those who prefer spoken texts—favored treatments emphasizing auditory elements. In contrast, textual verbalizers—those inclined towards written texts and with high working memory—benefited more from exposure to rich nonverbal cues. This study highlights the importance of a balanced instructional strategy that integrates both verbal and nonverbal cues, tailored specifically for learners with distinct cognitive traits and preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看到才能更好地理解?认知特征与非语言视觉线索在第二语言视频理解中的相互作用
本研究深入探讨了 L2 学习者的认知特征与非语言视觉支架之间的关系,特别是培训材料中嵌入的节拍手势和面部发音特征。这些支架已被证明可以提高 L1 的理解能力。本研究进一步探讨了这种关系如何影响这些支架对培训后学习者理解能力的影响。为此,研究招募了 120 名 20-24 岁的英语作为外语(EFL)学习者,他们的英语水平都在 B2 级,进行为期 4 周的混合教学。研究结果表明,工作记忆(WM)在第二语言学习者处理非语言视觉线索的过程中发挥着重要作用。高工作记忆水平的学习者对面部线索的理解能力有所提高,而低工作记忆水平的学习者则倾向于使用较少的非语言线索。此外,学习者对语言模式的偏好也是影响其理解能力的关键因素。听觉口头表达者--那些喜欢口语文本的人--偏爱强调听觉元素的治疗方法。相比之下,文字口头表达者--那些倾向于书面文本且工作记忆能力强的人--则更受益于丰富的非语言线索。这项研究强调了一种平衡的教学策略的重要性,这种策略综合了语言和非语言线索,专门为具有不同认知特征和偏好的学习者量身定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
期刊最新文献
Conquering the tower of Babel? How linguistic distance affects second and foreign language reading in German, English, and French in year 9 in Germany The effect of pre-reading morphological intervention on the acquisition and retention of morphologically complex words Timing of corrective feedback in mobile instant messaging: An exploratory study of L2 Modern Greek learners’ perceptions Mediating across the sustainable ecology: Researchers and practitioners as collaborating epistemic arbiters in developing a Global Englishes-informed coursebook “Go lang, teach!”: Understanding the motivations of Filipino migrant English teachers in Taiwan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1