COMPARISON OF IBI AND PBI CALCULATED FOR 68GA-PSMA AND 18F-FDG IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS

Maria Emilia Seren Takahashi , Stephan P.M. Souza , Fernanda C. Frasson , Gislaine B. Oliveira , Vania P. Castro , Fernando V. Pericole , Lício A. Velloso , Cármino A. Souza , Irene G.H. Lorand-Metze , Allan O. Santos , Celso Darío Ramos
{"title":"COMPARISON OF IBI AND PBI CALCULATED FOR 68GA-PSMA AND 18F-FDG IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS","authors":"Maria Emilia Seren Takahashi ,&nbsp;Stephan P.M. Souza ,&nbsp;Fernanda C. Frasson ,&nbsp;Gislaine B. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Vania P. Castro ,&nbsp;Fernando V. Pericole ,&nbsp;Lício A. Velloso ,&nbsp;Cármino A. Souza ,&nbsp;Irene G.H. Lorand-Metze ,&nbsp;Allan O. Santos ,&nbsp;Celso Darío Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2024.04.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Justification</h3><p>The benefits of using 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and managing treatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are extensively documented. Recent studies indicate that 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is also an excellent marker for MM lesions and may complement 18F-FDG due to the significant genetic heterogeneity observed in these patients' lesions. The involvement of bone tissue stands out as one of the most critical aspects of MM. To quantify this involvement, two quantitative parameters have recently been proposed: Percentage of Bone Involvement (PBI) and Intensity of Bone Involvement (IBI).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aims to compare PBI and IBI in 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG PET/CT images for multiple myeloma patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Fifteen patients were included in the study, 8 men (53.3%), with a mean age of 66.7 ± 10.7 years. The patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans with a maximum interval of 8 days between images (median 4 days). The bone tissue was segmented in the images based on the Hounsfield scale of the CT image, followed by processing for closing of the volume of interest (VOI). Both PBI and IBI were calculated for the two radiotracers, with the liver SUV used as a reference for 18F-FDG and the left atrium as a reference for 68Ga-PSMA. Spearman's rank-order correlation assessed the relationship between PBI and IBI data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On average, PBI values were higher for 68Ga-PSMA than for FDG, at 3.07% ± 2.5% and 1.96% ± 3.8%, respectively. The mean IBI values were similar for both radiotracers: 0.08 ± 0.13 for 18F-FDG and 0.08 ± 0.09 for 68Ga-PSMA. The median IBI calculated for 68Ga-PSMA was 0.05, higher than the 0.01 found for 18F-FDG. Despite the similarity in average values between 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG, the maximum PBI and IBI values were found in different patients for both radiotracers. Additionally, the Spearman test did not indicate correlation between the variables: (r = 0.39; p = 0.16) for PBI and (r = 0.41; p = 0.13) for IBI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The average and maximum values of PBI and IBI for 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG are close. However, no correlation was found between them, highlighting that the heterogeneous genetic profile of the disease results in different uptake patterns for both radiotracers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S253113792400169X/pdfft?md5=851d12fb7071ea838d867ad3d0ca231d&pid=1-s2.0-S253113792400169X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S253113792400169X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Justification

The benefits of using 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and managing treatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are extensively documented. Recent studies indicate that 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is also an excellent marker for MM lesions and may complement 18F-FDG due to the significant genetic heterogeneity observed in these patients' lesions. The involvement of bone tissue stands out as one of the most critical aspects of MM. To quantify this involvement, two quantitative parameters have recently been proposed: Percentage of Bone Involvement (PBI) and Intensity of Bone Involvement (IBI).

Objectives

This study aims to compare PBI and IBI in 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG PET/CT images for multiple myeloma patients.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen patients were included in the study, 8 men (53.3%), with a mean age of 66.7 ± 10.7 years. The patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans with a maximum interval of 8 days between images (median 4 days). The bone tissue was segmented in the images based on the Hounsfield scale of the CT image, followed by processing for closing of the volume of interest (VOI). Both PBI and IBI were calculated for the two radiotracers, with the liver SUV used as a reference for 18F-FDG and the left atrium as a reference for 68Ga-PSMA. Spearman's rank-order correlation assessed the relationship between PBI and IBI data.

Results

On average, PBI values were higher for 68Ga-PSMA than for FDG, at 3.07% ± 2.5% and 1.96% ± 3.8%, respectively. The mean IBI values were similar for both radiotracers: 0.08 ± 0.13 for 18F-FDG and 0.08 ± 0.09 for 68Ga-PSMA. The median IBI calculated for 68Ga-PSMA was 0.05, higher than the 0.01 found for 18F-FDG. Despite the similarity in average values between 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG, the maximum PBI and IBI values were found in different patients for both radiotracers. Additionally, the Spearman test did not indicate correlation between the variables: (r = 0.39; p = 0.16) for PBI and (r = 0.41; p = 0.13) for IBI.

Conclusion

The average and maximum values of PBI and IBI for 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG are close. However, no correlation was found between them, highlighting that the heterogeneous genetic profile of the disease results in different uptake patterns for both radiotracers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性骨髓瘤患者用 68GA-PSMA 和 18F-FDG 计算的 IBI 和 PBI 的比较
导言/理由:使用 18F-FDG PET/CT 对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者进行分期和治疗管理的好处已被广泛证实。最近的研究表明,68Ga-PSMA PET/CT 也是 MM 病变的极佳标记物,由于这些患者的病变具有显著的遗传异质性,因此 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT 可作为 18F-FDG 的补充。骨组织受累是 MM 最关键的方面之一。为了量化这种受累情况,最近提出了两个定量参数:本研究旨在比较多发性骨髓瘤患者 68Ga-PSMA 和 18F-FDG PET/CT 图像中的 PBI 和 IBI。患者接受了 68Ga-PSMA 和 18F-FDG PET/CT 扫描,两次扫描之间的间隔最长为 8 天(中位数为 4 天)。根据 CT 图像的 Hounsfield 标度对图像中的骨组织进行分割,然后进行处理以关闭感兴趣体(VOI)。计算两种放射性同位素的 PBI 和 IBI,18F-FDG 以肝脏 SUV 为参照,68Ga-PSMA 以左心房为参照。结果平均而言,68Ga-PSMA 的 PBI 值高于 FDG,分别为 3.07% ± 2.5% 和 1.96% ± 3.8%。两种放射性同位素的平均 IBI 值相似:18F-FDG 为 0.08 ± 0.13,68Ga-PSMA 为 0.08 ± 0.09。计算得出的 68Ga-PSMA IBI 中位数为 0.05,高于 18F-FDG 的 0.01。尽管 68Ga-PSMA 和 18F-FDG 的平均值相似,但两种放射性核素的最大 PBI 和 IBI 值却出现在不同的患者身上。结论 68Ga-PSMA 和 18F-FDG 的 PBI 和 IBI 平均值和最大值非常接近。然而,它们之间没有发现相关性,这突出表明该疾病的遗传特征异质性导致两种放射性核素的摄取模式不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The challenge of timely diagnosis and management of acute leukemias and associated infections in Latin America The Brazilian association of hematology, hemotherapy, and cell therapy (ABHH) and its absolute commitment to ethics and absence of conflicts of interest Diagnosis and management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: Brazilian consensus guidelines 2024 on behalf of the Brazilian Association of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cellular Therapy A SUCCESSFUL CASE OF PRIMARY PLASMA CELL LEUKEMIA TREATED WITH DARATUMUMAB-BASED THERAPY FOLLOWED BY AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION CARCINOMA EX PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA: DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1