Citrate-based dietary alkali supplements available in Germany: an overview.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1186/s40780-024-00342-0
Maximilian Andreas Storz, Alvaro Luis Ronco
{"title":"Citrate-based dietary alkali supplements available in Germany: an overview.","authors":"Maximilian Andreas Storz, Alvaro Luis Ronco","doi":"10.1186/s40780-024-00342-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fruits and vegetables are abundant in alkali precursors and effectively reduce the Potential Renal Acid Load (PRAL) from diet. Oral alkali supplements are supposed to exert comparable alkalizing effects on the human body, and have been shown to beneficially affect bone and kidney health. A comparative analysis of the available dietary alkali supplements in Germany was performed, contrasting their potential PRAL-lowering potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the currently available dietary citrate-based alkali supplements sold in Germany with a special focus on their mineral content, their PRAL-lowering potential and other characteristics inherent to each product. Supplements containing either potassium-, calcium- or magnesium citrate or any combination of these organic salts were reviewed. The total alkali load (TAL) was calculated based on the recommended daily dosage (RDD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen supplements with a mean alkali powder content of 220.69 ± 111.02 g were identified. The mean magnesium content per RDD was 239.93 ± 109.16 mg. The mean potassium and median calcium content were 550 ± 325.58 mg and 280 (240) mg, respectively. Median TAL was 1220 (328.75) mg. The PRAL-lowering potential from a single RDD ranged from - 51.65 mEq to -8.32 mEq. Substantial price differences were found, and the mean price of the examined supplements was 16.67 ± 5.77 Euros. The median price for a 1 mEq PRAL-reduction was 3.01 (3.14) cents, and ranged from 0.77 cents to 10.82 cents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Noticeable differences between the identified alkali supplements were encountered, warranting an individual and context-specific approach in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11084099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-024-00342-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fruits and vegetables are abundant in alkali precursors and effectively reduce the Potential Renal Acid Load (PRAL) from diet. Oral alkali supplements are supposed to exert comparable alkalizing effects on the human body, and have been shown to beneficially affect bone and kidney health. A comparative analysis of the available dietary alkali supplements in Germany was performed, contrasting their potential PRAL-lowering potential.

Methods: We reviewed the currently available dietary citrate-based alkali supplements sold in Germany with a special focus on their mineral content, their PRAL-lowering potential and other characteristics inherent to each product. Supplements containing either potassium-, calcium- or magnesium citrate or any combination of these organic salts were reviewed. The total alkali load (TAL) was calculated based on the recommended daily dosage (RDD).

Results: Sixteen supplements with a mean alkali powder content of 220.69 ± 111.02 g were identified. The mean magnesium content per RDD was 239.93 ± 109.16 mg. The mean potassium and median calcium content were 550 ± 325.58 mg and 280 (240) mg, respectively. Median TAL was 1220 (328.75) mg. The PRAL-lowering potential from a single RDD ranged from - 51.65 mEq to -8.32 mEq. Substantial price differences were found, and the mean price of the examined supplements was 16.67 ± 5.77 Euros. The median price for a 1 mEq PRAL-reduction was 3.01 (3.14) cents, and ranged from 0.77 cents to 10.82 cents.

Conclusions: Noticeable differences between the identified alkali supplements were encountered, warranting an individual and context-specific approach in daily clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国现有的柠檬酸盐膳食碱补充剂:概述。
背景:水果和蔬菜含有丰富的碱性前体物质,可有效降低饮食中的潜在肾酸负荷(PRAL)。口服碱补充剂应该也能对人体产生类似的碱化作用,并对骨骼和肾脏健康产生有益影响。我们对德国现有的膳食碱补充剂进行了比较分析,对比了它们降低 PRAL 的潜力:我们对目前在德国销售的基于柠檬酸盐的膳食碱性补充剂进行了审查,重点关注其矿物质含量、降低 PRAL 的潜力以及每种产品固有的其他特征。我们对含有柠檬酸钾、柠檬酸钙或柠檬酸镁或这些有机盐的任何组合的补充剂进行了审查。根据推荐日剂量(RDD)计算总碱负荷(TAL):结果:16 种营养补充剂的平均碱粉含量为 220.69 ± 111.02 克。每个 RDD 的平均镁含量为 239.93 ± 109.16 毫克。钾和钙的平均含量中位数分别为 550 ± 325.58 毫克和 280 (240) 毫克。TAL中位数为1220(328.75)毫克。单个 RDD 的 PRAL 降低潜能值从 - 51.65 mEq 到 -8.32 mEq 不等。降低 1 毫升 PRAL 的中位价格为 3.01 (3.14) 美分,范围从 0.77 美分到 10.82 美分不等:结论:已确定的碱补充剂之间存在明显差异,因此在日常临床实践中应因人而异、因地制宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compatibility of hypokalaemia caused by low-dose prednisolone plus abiraterone acetate therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A qualitative study on the current status and problems of pharmacists in home healthcare from the viewpoint of care managers in medically underpopulated areas in Japan. Effects of famotidine use during pregnancy: an observational cohort study. Development and validation of the prediction score for augmented renal clearance in critically Ill Japanese adults. Investigating the hypothermic effects of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials on non-bacterial fever model mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1