Eye-tracking-based analysis of pharmacists' thought processes in the dispensing work: research related to the efficiency in dispensing based on right-brain thinking.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1186/s40780-024-00341-1
Toshikazu Tsuji, Kenichiro Nagata, Masayuki Tanaka, Shigeru Hasebe, Takashi Yukita, Mayako Uchida, Kimitaka Suetsugu, Takeshi Hirota, Ichiro Ieiri
{"title":"Eye-tracking-based analysis of pharmacists' thought processes in the dispensing work: research related to the efficiency in dispensing based on right-brain thinking.","authors":"Toshikazu Tsuji, Kenichiro Nagata, Masayuki Tanaka, Shigeru Hasebe, Takashi Yukita, Mayako Uchida, Kimitaka Suetsugu, Takeshi Hirota, Ichiro Ieiri","doi":"10.1186/s40780-024-00341-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists should be aware of their thought processes in dispensing work, including differences in the dispensing complexities owing to different drug positions in the left, center, and right areas. Dispensing errors associated with \"same-name drugs (a pair of drugs with the same name but a different ingredient quantity)\" are prevalent and often negatively affect patients. In this study, using five pairs of comparative models, the gaze movements of pharmacists in dispensing work were analyzed using an eye-tracking method to elucidate their thought processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prepared verification slides and displayed them on a prescription monitor and three drug rack monitors. The dispensing information (drug name, drug usage, location display, and total amount) was displayed on a prescription monitor. A total of 180 drugs including five target drugs were displayed on the three drug rack monitors. Total gaze points in the prescription area, those in the drug rack area, total vertical movements between the two areas, and time required to dispense drugs were measured as the four classifications Gaze 1, Gaze 2, Passage, and Time, respectively. First, we defined the two types of location displays as \"numeral combination\" and \"color/symbol combination.\" Next, we defined two pairs of models A<sub>1</sub>-A<sub>2</sub> (numerals) and B<sub>1</sub>-B<sub>2</sub> (color/symbol) to compare differences between the left and right areas. Moreover, three pairs of models C<sub>1</sub>-C<sub>2</sub> (left), D<sub>1</sub>-D<sub>2</sub> (center), and E<sub>1</sub>-E<sub>2</sub> (right) were established to compare differences between \"numeral combination\" and \"color/symbol combination.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in the complexities of dispensing work were observed in Gaze 2, Passage, and Time between the models A<sub>1</sub>-A<sub>2</sub> (A<sub>1</sub><A<sub>2</sub>), in Gaze 2 between the models B<sub>1</sub>-B<sub>2</sub> (B<sub>1</sub>>B<sub>2</sub>), and in Gaze 2 and Time between the models C<sub>1</sub>-C<sub>2</sub>, D<sub>1</sub>-D<sub>2</sub>, and E<sub>1</sub>-E<sub>2</sub> (C<sub>1</sub>>C<sub>2</sub>, D<sub>1</sub>>D<sub>2</sub>, and E<sub>1</sub>>E<sub>2</sub>, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the current dispensing rules, pharmacists are not good at dispensing drugs located in the right area. An effective measure for reducing the dispensing complexity is to introduce visual information in the prescription content; the utilization of the right brain facilitates reducing the complexity in the right dispensing area.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11084062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-024-00341-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists should be aware of their thought processes in dispensing work, including differences in the dispensing complexities owing to different drug positions in the left, center, and right areas. Dispensing errors associated with "same-name drugs (a pair of drugs with the same name but a different ingredient quantity)" are prevalent and often negatively affect patients. In this study, using five pairs of comparative models, the gaze movements of pharmacists in dispensing work were analyzed using an eye-tracking method to elucidate their thought processes.

Methods: We prepared verification slides and displayed them on a prescription monitor and three drug rack monitors. The dispensing information (drug name, drug usage, location display, and total amount) was displayed on a prescription monitor. A total of 180 drugs including five target drugs were displayed on the three drug rack monitors. Total gaze points in the prescription area, those in the drug rack area, total vertical movements between the two areas, and time required to dispense drugs were measured as the four classifications Gaze 1, Gaze 2, Passage, and Time, respectively. First, we defined the two types of location displays as "numeral combination" and "color/symbol combination." Next, we defined two pairs of models A1-A2 (numerals) and B1-B2 (color/symbol) to compare differences between the left and right areas. Moreover, three pairs of models C1-C2 (left), D1-D2 (center), and E1-E2 (right) were established to compare differences between "numeral combination" and "color/symbol combination."

Results: Significant differences in the complexities of dispensing work were observed in Gaze 2, Passage, and Time between the models A1-A2 (A12), in Gaze 2 between the models B1-B2 (B1>B2), and in Gaze 2 and Time between the models C1-C2, D1-D2, and E1-E2 (C1>C2, D1>D2, and E1>E2, respectively).

Conclusions: Using the current dispensing rules, pharmacists are not good at dispensing drugs located in the right area. An effective measure for reducing the dispensing complexity is to introduce visual information in the prescription content; the utilization of the right brain facilitates reducing the complexity in the right dispensing area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于眼动跟踪的药剂师配药工作思维过程分析:基于右脑思维的配药效率相关研究。
背景:药剂师应注意自己在配药工作中的思维过程,包括因左、中、右区域药物位置不同而导致的配药复杂性差异。与 "同名药物(一对名称相同但成分数量不同的药物)"相关的配药错误非常普遍,并且经常对患者造成负面影响。本研究利用五对对比模型,采用眼动追踪法分析了药剂师在配药工作中的注视动作,以阐明他们的思维过程:我们准备了验证幻灯片,并将其显示在一个处方显示器和三个药架显示器上。配药信息(药品名称、药品用途、位置显示和总量)显示在处方显示器上。三个药架显示器上共显示了 180 种药物,包括 5 种目标药物。处方区、药架区的总注视点、两个区域之间的总垂直移动以及配药所需的时间分别以注视 1、注视 2、经过和时间四个分类进行测量。首先,我们将两种位置显示定义为 "数字组合 "和 "颜色/符号组合"。接着,我们定义了两对模型 A1-A2(数字)和 B1-B2(颜色/符号),以比较左右区域的差异。此外,我们还建立了 C1-C2(左)、D1-D2(中)和 E1-E2(右)三对模型,以比较 "数字组合 "和 "颜色/符号组合 "之间的差异:在 A1-A2 模型(A12)之间的凝视 2、通道和时间,在 B1-B2 模型(B1>B2)之间的凝视 2,以及在 C1-C2、D1-D2 和 E1-E2 模型(分别为 C1>C2、D1>D2 和 E1>E2)之间的凝视 2 和时间中,都观察到了配药工作复杂性的显著差异:结论:在目前的配药规则下,药剂师并不擅长在正确的区域配药。降低配药复杂度的有效措施是在处方内容中引入视觉信息;利用右脑有助于降低右侧配药区域的复杂度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compatibility of hypokalaemia caused by low-dose prednisolone plus abiraterone acetate therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A qualitative study on the current status and problems of pharmacists in home healthcare from the viewpoint of care managers in medically underpopulated areas in Japan. Effects of famotidine use during pregnancy: an observational cohort study. Development and validation of the prediction score for augmented renal clearance in critically Ill Japanese adults. Investigating the hypothermic effects of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials on non-bacterial fever model mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1