The use of dienogest in treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102795
Mohamed Khairy Ali, Reda Salah Hussein, Karim Sayed Abdallah, Ahmed Aboelfadle Mohamed
{"title":"The use of dienogest in treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mohamed Khairy Ali,&nbsp;Reda Salah Hussein,&nbsp;Karim Sayed Abdallah,&nbsp;Ahmed Aboelfadle Mohamed","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adenomyosis is a gynaecological problem that impacts women's quality of life by causing dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and menorrhagia. The search continues for the best medical treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of dienogest, an oral progestin, in reducing pain and bleeding associated with adenomyosis. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in January 2024. The primary outcome was pain scores for dysmenorrhea, whereas secondary outcomes were chronic pelvic pain (CPP), uterine volume (UV), and menorrhagia. One comparison was performed comparing outcomes in symptomatic adenomyosis before and after treatment with dienogest. Pooled analysis of included studies reported a statistically significant reduction of dysmenorrhea pain score after dienogest treatment (mean difference -5.86 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, 95 % CI -7.20 to -4.53, I2 = 97 %). Regarding chronic pelvic pain, a meta-analysis of included studies showed a significant decline in pain after treatment (standardized mean difference -2.37, 95 % CI -2.89 to -1.86, I2 = 60 %). However, uterine volume did not differ significantly after treatment (mean difference -4.65 cm<sup>3</sup>, 95 % CI -43.22 to 33.91). Menorrhagia was improved significantly after treatment (Peto odds ratio 0.07, 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.18). In conclusion, dienogest seems to be effective in controlling painful symptoms and uterine bleeding in women with adenomyosis at short and long-term therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 7","pages":"Article 102795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adenomyosis is a gynaecological problem that impacts women's quality of life by causing dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and menorrhagia. The search continues for the best medical treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of dienogest, an oral progestin, in reducing pain and bleeding associated with adenomyosis. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in January 2024. The primary outcome was pain scores for dysmenorrhea, whereas secondary outcomes were chronic pelvic pain (CPP), uterine volume (UV), and menorrhagia. One comparison was performed comparing outcomes in symptomatic adenomyosis before and after treatment with dienogest. Pooled analysis of included studies reported a statistically significant reduction of dysmenorrhea pain score after dienogest treatment (mean difference -5.86 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, 95 % CI -7.20 to -4.53, I2 = 97 %). Regarding chronic pelvic pain, a meta-analysis of included studies showed a significant decline in pain after treatment (standardized mean difference -2.37, 95 % CI -2.89 to -1.86, I2 = 60 %). However, uterine volume did not differ significantly after treatment (mean difference -4.65 cm3, 95 % CI -43.22 to 33.91). Menorrhagia was improved significantly after treatment (Peto odds ratio 0.07, 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.18). In conclusion, dienogest seems to be effective in controlling painful symptoms and uterine bleeding in women with adenomyosis at short and long-term therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用地诺孕酮治疗症状性腺肌症:系统综述和荟萃分析。
子宫腺肌症是一种妇科疾病,会导致痛经、慢性盆腔疼痛和月经过多,从而影响妇女的生活质量。人们一直在寻找治疗无症状子宫腺肌症的最佳药物。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了口服孕激素地诺孕酮在减少与子宫腺肌症相关的疼痛和出血方面的作用。在 2024 年 1 月对 Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心 (CENTRAL)、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了检索。主要结果是痛经的疼痛评分,次要结果是慢性盆腔痛(CPP)、子宫体积(UV)和月经过多。有一项研究比较了无症状子宫腺肌症在使用地诺孕酮治疗前后的结果。对纳入研究的汇总分析表明,使用地诺孕酮治疗后,痛经疼痛评分在统计学上有显著降低(10 厘米视觉模拟量表上的平均差异为-5.86 厘米,95% CI 为-7.20 至-4.53,I2 = 97%)。关于慢性盆腔疼痛,对纳入研究的荟萃分析表明,治疗后疼痛明显减轻(标准化平均差异-2.37,95% CI -2.89至-1.86,I2 = 60%)。然而,子宫体积在治疗后并无明显变化(平均差异-4.65 立方厘米,95% CI -43.22至33.91)。月经过多在治疗后得到明显改善(佩托几率比 0.07,95% CI 0.03 至 0.18)。总之,在短期和长期治疗中,地诺孕酮似乎能有效控制子宫腺肌症妇女的疼痛症状和子宫出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1