The Efficacy of Three Different Oral Hygiene Regimens in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Klinische Padiatrie Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1055/a-2290-6323
Utku Aygunes, Barbaros Sahin Karagun, Ilgen Sasmaz, Bülent Antmen
{"title":"The Efficacy of Three Different Oral Hygiene Regimens in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.","authors":"Utku Aygunes, Barbaros Sahin Karagun, Ilgen Sasmaz, Bülent Antmen","doi":"10.1055/a-2290-6323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral mucositis is one of the side effects developed post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of a mouthwash mixture (lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, pheniramine) versus hyaluronic acid and a solution of sodium bicarbonate in terms of healing time and weight gain in the treatment of oral mucositis in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with hemato-oncological malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 171 patients that received chemotherapy for the hematopoietic stem cell transplant were divided into three groups; group 1, treated with a mixed mouthwash of lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, and pheniramine; group 2, treated with hyaluronic acid; and group 3, treated with an aqueous solution of 5% sodium bicarbonate. Weight and mucositis scale scores derived from medical records of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in the mucositis scale scores between the groups on the transplant day and days 5, 10, 15 and 20 after the transplantation. At these measurement points, Group 2 (receiving hyaluronic acid) had a lower score, and Group 3 (who received sodium bicarbonate) had a higher score, especially on days 5 and 10 after the transplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that hyaluronic acid is a more effective treatment option than the other oral care solutions that are frequently used for prophylaxis and treatment of oral mucositis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17846,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Padiatrie","volume":"236 3","pages":"180-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Padiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2290-6323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral mucositis is one of the side effects developed post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of a mouthwash mixture (lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, pheniramine) versus hyaluronic acid and a solution of sodium bicarbonate in terms of healing time and weight gain in the treatment of oral mucositis in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with hemato-oncological malignancies.

Methods: A total of 171 patients that received chemotherapy for the hematopoietic stem cell transplant were divided into three groups; group 1, treated with a mixed mouthwash of lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, and pheniramine; group 2, treated with hyaluronic acid; and group 3, treated with an aqueous solution of 5% sodium bicarbonate. Weight and mucositis scale scores derived from medical records of patients.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the mucositis scale scores between the groups on the transplant day and days 5, 10, 15 and 20 after the transplantation. At these measurement points, Group 2 (receiving hyaluronic acid) had a lower score, and Group 3 (who received sodium bicarbonate) had a higher score, especially on days 5 and 10 after the transplantation.

Conclusion: The results suggest that hyaluronic acid is a more effective treatment option than the other oral care solutions that are frequently used for prophylaxis and treatment of oral mucositis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种不同口腔卫生方案对预防接受造血干细胞移植的儿科患者因化疗引发口腔黏膜炎的功效
背景:口腔黏膜炎是造血干细胞移植后出现的副作用之一:口腔黏膜炎是造血干细胞移植后出现的副作用之一。这项回顾性研究旨在评估漱口水混合物(利多卡因、海藻酸钠、蔗糖酸钠、苯海拉明)与透明质酸和碳酸氢钠溶液在治疗接受异体造血干细胞移植的儿童血液肿瘤恶性肿瘤患者口腔黏膜炎的愈合时间和体重增加方面的疗效:共将171名接受造血干细胞移植化疗的患者分为三组:第一组,使用利多卡因、海藻酸钠、蔗糖酸钠和苯海拉明混合漱口水治疗;第二组,使用透明质酸治疗;第三组,使用5%碳酸氢钠水溶液治疗。体重和粘膜炎量表评分来自患者的医疗记录:结果:移植当天以及移植后第 5、10、15 和 20 天,各组的粘膜炎量表评分差异有统计学意义。在这些测量点上,第2组(接受透明质酸治疗)得分较低,而第3组(接受碳酸氢钠治疗)得分较高,尤其是在移植后第5天和第10天:结果表明,与其他常用于预防和治疗口腔黏膜炎的口腔护理液相比,透明质酸是一种更有效的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Klinische Padiatrie
Klinische Padiatrie 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Das Forum für wissenschaftliche Information in der Kinderheilkunde ausgewählte Originalarbeiten aus allen Bereichen der Pädiatrie Visite: Ihr Forum für interessante Krankengeschichten und außergewöhnliche Kasuistiken aktuelle Fortschritte in Diagnostik und Therapie jährliche Schwerpunkthefte: Ergebnisse der pädiatrischen Onkologie plus Medizin und Markt topaktuelle Informationen aus der Industrie
期刊最新文献
Is Serum Uric Acid to Creatinine Ratio Associated with Hypertension and Metabolic Syndrome in Children with Obesity? [Artificial intelligence in paediatric pneumology - opportunities and unanswered questions]. [The white lung: Ultrasound diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome]. Severe Manifestation of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis in an Adolescent with Respiratory, Hemorrhagic and Vascular Occlusive Complications. Correction: Pre-chewing of infant food - expectations towards an old, traditional feeding habit for potential allergy prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1