Rethinking ecosystem services from the anthropocene to the Ecozoic: Nature’s benefits to the biotic community

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecosystem Services Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101624
Joshua Farley , Rigo E.M. Melgar , Danish Hasan Ansari , Matthew J. Burke , Julia Danielsen , Megan Egler , Lizah Makombore , Juliana Neira , Shashank Poudel , Shaun Sellers , Nina L. Smolyar , Joshua Sterlin , Joshua Taylor , Iván Darío Vargas Roncancio
{"title":"Rethinking ecosystem services from the anthropocene to the Ecozoic: Nature’s benefits to the biotic community","authors":"Joshua Farley ,&nbsp;Rigo E.M. Melgar ,&nbsp;Danish Hasan Ansari ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Burke ,&nbsp;Julia Danielsen ,&nbsp;Megan Egler ,&nbsp;Lizah Makombore ,&nbsp;Juliana Neira ,&nbsp;Shashank Poudel ,&nbsp;Shaun Sellers ,&nbsp;Nina L. Smolyar ,&nbsp;Joshua Sterlin ,&nbsp;Joshua Taylor ,&nbsp;Iván Darío Vargas Roncancio","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Ecozoic is defined as an era characterized by the mutual flourishing of humans and the rest of Nature. The field of Ecosystem Services should be dedicated to achieving this goal. However, ecosystem services (ES) are commonly defined as Nature’s benefits to people, an anthropocentric concept. Many schemes proposed to assess and value ES are market oriented, thus focused on the satisfaction of subjective individual preferences, an egocentric approach. Yet modern science accepts that all complex species, including humans, are an inseparable part of Nature, incapable of surviving without the ecosystem services Nature generates. Nature is the whole, the economy is the part; we must internalize the economy into nature, not vice versa. This article builds on evolutionary theory, anthropology and ecological economics to explain the necessity of an <em>ecocentric</em> approach to ecosystem services embodied in economic institutions prioritizing Nature. We must create new economic institutions focused on the health of the whole system to complement existing institutions focused on the individual (e.g. markets) and on society (e.g. the public sector and other collective institutions), with the recognition that system health also depends on the health of system components. We therefore propose redefining ecosystem services as Nature’s benefits to the biotic community of which humans are a part. The relationship of humanity to nature should be the same as that of a cell to the human body: prioritize the health of whole and take only the minimum necessary for secure sufficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ecozoic is defined as an era characterized by the mutual flourishing of humans and the rest of Nature. The field of Ecosystem Services should be dedicated to achieving this goal. However, ecosystem services (ES) are commonly defined as Nature’s benefits to people, an anthropocentric concept. Many schemes proposed to assess and value ES are market oriented, thus focused on the satisfaction of subjective individual preferences, an egocentric approach. Yet modern science accepts that all complex species, including humans, are an inseparable part of Nature, incapable of surviving without the ecosystem services Nature generates. Nature is the whole, the economy is the part; we must internalize the economy into nature, not vice versa. This article builds on evolutionary theory, anthropology and ecological economics to explain the necessity of an ecocentric approach to ecosystem services embodied in economic institutions prioritizing Nature. We must create new economic institutions focused on the health of the whole system to complement existing institutions focused on the individual (e.g. markets) and on society (e.g. the public sector and other collective institutions), with the recognition that system health also depends on the health of system components. We therefore propose redefining ecosystem services as Nature’s benefits to the biotic community of which humans are a part. The relationship of humanity to nature should be the same as that of a cell to the human body: prioritize the health of whole and take only the minimum necessary for secure sufficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 "人类世 "到 "生态世 "重新思考生态系统服务:大自然对生物群落的益处
生态文明被定义为一个以人类与大自然共同繁荣为特征的时代。生态系统服务领域应致力于实现这一目标。然而,生态系统服务 (ES) 通常被定义为大自然给人类带来的益处,这是一个以人类为中心的概念。许多评估和评价生态系统服务的方案都是以市场为导向的,因此侧重于满足个人的主观偏好,这是一种以自我为中心的方法。然而,现代科学认为,包括人类在内的所有复杂物种都是大自然不可分割的一部分,没有大自然提供的生态系统服务就无法生存。自然是整体,经济是部分;我们必须将经济内化为自然,而不是相反。本文以进化论、人类学和生态经济学为基础,解释了以生态为中心的生态系统服务方法的必要性,这种方法体现在以自然为优先的经济体制中。我们必须创建关注整个系统健康的新经济机构,以补充现有的关注个人(如市场)和社会(如公共部门和其他集体机构)的机构,同时认识到系统健康也取决于系统组成部分的健康。因此,我们建议将生态系统服务重新定义为大自然对生物群落(人类是其中的一部分)的惠益。人类与大自然的关系应与细胞与人体的关系相同:优先考虑整体健康,只获取确保充足所需的最低限度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem Services ECOLOGYENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly. Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.
期刊最新文献
A multi-indicator distributive justice approach to assess school-related green infrastructure benefits in Brussels Ecosystem accounting applied to the restoration of a brackish coastal lagoon highlights the importance of individual ecosystem-level studies A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands Integration of the system of environmental economic accounting-ecosystem accounting (SEEA-EA) framework with a semi-distributed hydrological and water quality simulation model Collaborative models and uncertain water quality in payments for watershed services: China’s Jiuzhou River eco-compensation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1