Intercropping of Tropical Grassland and Pigeon Pea: Impact on Microclimate, Soil Water, and Forage Production

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Rangeland Ecology & Management Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.005
José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane , Patrícia Perondi Anchão de Oliveira , André de Faria Pedroso , Willian Lucas Bonani , Cristiam Bosi , Henrique Bauab Brunetti , Rolando Pasquini Neto , Althieres José Furtado , Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues
{"title":"Intercropping of Tropical Grassland and Pigeon Pea: Impact on Microclimate, Soil Water, and Forage Production","authors":"José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane ,&nbsp;Patrícia Perondi Anchão de Oliveira ,&nbsp;André de Faria Pedroso ,&nbsp;Willian Lucas Bonani ,&nbsp;Cristiam Bosi ,&nbsp;Henrique Bauab Brunetti ,&nbsp;Rolando Pasquini Neto ,&nbsp;Althieres José Furtado ,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although several strategies can be used for pasture recovery, pasture degradation remains an issue in Brazilian cattle raising. The use of shrub legumes can change the environment (microclimate and water consumption) and productive potential of the pasture. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two pasture recovery strategies on the microclimate, soil water dynamics, and forage accumulation of tropical pastures. The research was conducted between 2020 and 2022 in signalgrass (<em>Urochloa</em> [syn. <em>Brachiaria</em>] <em>decumbens</em> Stapf cv. Basilisk) pastures managed under continuous and variable stocking rate throughout the experimental period in São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Three production systems were assessed: 1) degraded pasture without N fertilization (DEG); 2) recovered pasture with application of 200 kg N-urea ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (REC); and 3) recovered pasture by intercropping with pigeon pea (<em>Cajanus cajan</em> L. Millsp. cv. BRS Mandarim) (MIX). Soil moisture in the 0–60 cm layer and microclimate, which included photosynthetically active radiation and the animal thermal comfort index, were assessed. The vegetative and productive characteristics of pastures, as well as the total mass production of the production systems, were also evaluated. Overall, intercropping pigeon pea plants with tropical pasture did not significantly affect the soil water content or the animal thermal comfort index. However, it did alter the transmission of photosynthetically active solar radiation to the pasture (0%‒65%) and decreased wind speed (0%‒60%). During the 2 yr, the pigeon pea exhibited a great forage accumulation potential (12 615 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup>·yr<sup>−1</sup>). Additionally, pigeon pea provided high-quality forage available during the dry season. Forage accumulation increased in both pasture recovery strategies (REC and MIX), with a significantly greater amount of crude protein (CP) content in the MIX. Intercropping tropical pastures with pigeon pea can be used as a strategy for pasture recovery and dry season forage supplementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although several strategies can be used for pasture recovery, pasture degradation remains an issue in Brazilian cattle raising. The use of shrub legumes can change the environment (microclimate and water consumption) and productive potential of the pasture. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two pasture recovery strategies on the microclimate, soil water dynamics, and forage accumulation of tropical pastures. The research was conducted between 2020 and 2022 in signalgrass (Urochloa [syn. Brachiaria] decumbens Stapf cv. Basilisk) pastures managed under continuous and variable stocking rate throughout the experimental period in São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Three production systems were assessed: 1) degraded pasture without N fertilization (DEG); 2) recovered pasture with application of 200 kg N-urea ha−1 yr−1 (REC); and 3) recovered pasture by intercropping with pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp. cv. BRS Mandarim) (MIX). Soil moisture in the 0–60 cm layer and microclimate, which included photosynthetically active radiation and the animal thermal comfort index, were assessed. The vegetative and productive characteristics of pastures, as well as the total mass production of the production systems, were also evaluated. Overall, intercropping pigeon pea plants with tropical pasture did not significantly affect the soil water content or the animal thermal comfort index. However, it did alter the transmission of photosynthetically active solar radiation to the pasture (0%‒65%) and decreased wind speed (0%‒60%). During the 2 yr, the pigeon pea exhibited a great forage accumulation potential (12 615 kg·ha−1·yr−1). Additionally, pigeon pea provided high-quality forage available during the dry season. Forage accumulation increased in both pasture recovery strategies (REC and MIX), with a significantly greater amount of crude protein (CP) content in the MIX. Intercropping tropical pastures with pigeon pea can be used as a strategy for pasture recovery and dry season forage supplementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热带草地与鸽子豆间作:对小气候、土壤水分和牧草产量的影响
虽然可以采用多种策略来恢复草场,但草场退化仍然是巴西养牛业的一个问题。灌木豆科植物的使用会改变牧场的环境(小气候和耗水量)和生产潜力。因此,本研究旨在评估两种牧场恢复策略对热带牧场小气候、土壤水动态和饲料积累的影响。研究于 2020 年至 2022 年期间在巴西南太平洋圣卡洛斯市的信号草(Urochloa [syn. Brachiaria] decumbens Stapf cv. Basilisk)牧场进行,在整个实验期间,牧场采用连续和可变放牧率管理。对三种生产系统进行了评估:1)不施氮肥的退化牧场(DEG);2)每年每公顷施用 200 千克尿素的复原牧场(REC);3)与豌豆(Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.对 0-60 厘米土层的土壤湿度和小气候(包括光合有效辐射和动物热舒适指数)进行了评估。此外,还评估了牧草的植被和生产特性,以及生产系统的总产量。总体而言,将豌豆与热带牧草间作不会对土壤含水量或动物热舒适指数产生显著影响。不过,它确实改变了光合有效太阳辐射向牧草的传输(0%-65%),并降低了风速(0%-60%)。在这两年中,鸽子豆表现出了巨大的饲料积累潜力(12 615 kg-公顷-1-年-1)。此外,豌豆还能在旱季提供优质牧草。两种牧草恢复策略(REC 和 MIX)都能增加牧草积累,其中 MIX 的粗蛋白(CP)含量明显更高。热带牧场与豌豆间作可作为牧场恢复和旱季饲料补充的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Evaluating the Sagebrush Conservation Design Strategy Through the Performance of a Sagebrush Indicator Species Defend and Grow the Core for Birds: How a Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Benefits Rangeland Birds The Carbon Security Index: A Novel Approach to Assessing How Secure Carbon Is in Sagebrush Ecosystems Within the Great Basin Crossing the Chasm: Using Technical Transfer to Bridge Science Production and Management Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1