Examining the social and behavioral dynamics of substance use in a longitudinal network study in rural Appalachia

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108060
Elizabeth M. Upton , Joseph LaRocca , Abby E. Rudolph , April M. Young , Jennifer R. Havens
{"title":"Examining the social and behavioral dynamics of substance use in a longitudinal network study in rural Appalachia","authors":"Elizabeth M. Upton ,&nbsp;Joseph LaRocca ,&nbsp;Abby E. Rudolph ,&nbsp;April M. Young ,&nbsp;Jennifer R. Havens","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prior studies have shown that individuals and their peers often have similar substance use behaviors, but the mechanisms driving these similarities – particularly in rural settings, are not well understood. The primary objectives of this analysis are to (1) identify factors that contribute to relationship turnover and maintenance within a rural network of persons who use drugs (PWUD), (2) determine whether assimilation and/or homophily shape participants use of injection drugs, heroin, and stimulants (methamphetamine and cocaine), and (3) assess the extent that these mechanisms influence networks ties and/or behaviors and whether these effects vary across time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sociometric network data were collected from a cohort of PWUD in rural Eastern Kentucky at baseline (2008–2010) and at four follow-up visits conducted approximately semiannually. Stochastic actor-oriented models (SAOMS) were used to model network structure and participant behaviors as jointly dependent variables and to identify characteristics associated with the maintenance, dissolution, and formation of network ties and changes in drug use behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Findings suggest (1) greater network stability over time for reciprocal and transitive relationships, (2) both homophily and assimilation played a greater role in shaping injection drug use (IDU) initiation and cessation than they did in shaping heroin and stimulant use, and (3) the importance of these mechanisms appeared consistent over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Given the stability of particular network structures and evidence of both homophily and assimilation with respect to drug-use behaviors, interventions that leverage social networks could be used to motivate health-promoting behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prior studies have shown that individuals and their peers often have similar substance use behaviors, but the mechanisms driving these similarities – particularly in rural settings, are not well understood. The primary objectives of this analysis are to (1) identify factors that contribute to relationship turnover and maintenance within a rural network of persons who use drugs (PWUD), (2) determine whether assimilation and/or homophily shape participants use of injection drugs, heroin, and stimulants (methamphetamine and cocaine), and (3) assess the extent that these mechanisms influence networks ties and/or behaviors and whether these effects vary across time.

Methods

Sociometric network data were collected from a cohort of PWUD in rural Eastern Kentucky at baseline (2008–2010) and at four follow-up visits conducted approximately semiannually. Stochastic actor-oriented models (SAOMS) were used to model network structure and participant behaviors as jointly dependent variables and to identify characteristics associated with the maintenance, dissolution, and formation of network ties and changes in drug use behaviors.

Results

Findings suggest (1) greater network stability over time for reciprocal and transitive relationships, (2) both homophily and assimilation played a greater role in shaping injection drug use (IDU) initiation and cessation than they did in shaping heroin and stimulant use, and (3) the importance of these mechanisms appeared consistent over time.

Conclusion

Given the stability of particular network structures and evidence of both homophily and assimilation with respect to drug-use behaviors, interventions that leverage social networks could be used to motivate health-promoting behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿巴拉契亚农村地区的一项纵向网络研究中考察药物使用的社会和行为动态
背景先前的研究表明,个人及其同龄人通常有相似的药物使用行为,但对这些相似性的驱动机制--尤其是在农村环境中--还不甚了解。本分析的主要目的是:(1)确定在农村吸毒者(PWUD)网络中促成关系更替和维持的因素;(2)确定同化和/或同亲是否会影响参与者对注射毒品、海洛因和兴奋剂(甲基苯丙胺和可卡因)的使用;(3)评估这些机制对网络联系和/或行为的影响程度,以及这些影响是否会随着时间的推移而变化。方法在基线(2008-2010 年)和大约每半年进行一次的四次随访中,从肯塔基州东部农村地区的吸毒和非法药物滥用者队列中收集了社会计量网络数据。随机行为者导向模型(SAOMS)被用来模拟作为共同因变量的网络结构和参与者行为,并确定与网络联系的维持、解散和形成以及吸毒行为变化相关的特征。结果研究结果表明:(1) 随着时间的推移,互惠关系和传递关系的网络稳定性更高;(2) 与海洛因和兴奋剂的使用相比,同亲关系和同化关系在影响注射吸毒(IDU)的开始和停止方面的作用更大;(3) 随着时间的推移,这些机制的重要性似乎是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Exposure to Bupropion-SR vs. Placebo is associated with reductions in smoking among persons receiving methadone with no stated interest in smoking cessation The transition from cigarette smoking to the exclusive or partial use of e-cigarettes: A multi-stage mixed methods study among French university students Preventing the transitions in poly-tobacco use among young adults: A latent transition analysis of a smoking reduction intervention trial Cannabis use and associated longitudinal transitions in electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young adults in the United States A novel smoking cessation behavior based on quit attempts may identify new genes associated with long-term abstinence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1