Physical Activity Fragmentation and Falls in Older Adults: Findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study

Braden K Popelsky, Kelley Pettee Gabriel, Erin E Dooley, Kelly R Ylitalo
{"title":"Physical Activity Fragmentation and Falls in Older Adults: Findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study","authors":"Braden K Popelsky, Kelley Pettee Gabriel, Erin E Dooley, Kelly R Ylitalo","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Physical activity (PA) may be an important fall prevention strategy. Current PA guidelines emphasize total PA dose, but daily patterning of PA is underappreciated. With aging, PA bouts become less frequent and shorter in duration (i.e.: more fragmented). PA fragmentation may be an indicator of fall risk, but the relationship is not well understood. This study examined daily PA accumulation and patterns with fall risk in older adults. Methods Participants (n=685, 54.3% female, 61.5% aged 70-79 years) from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) with wrist-worn accelerometry PA data from Round 11 (baseline) and sample person interviews with fall data from Round 12 (follow-up) were included. PA variables were categorized into tertiles and incident falls were defined as ≥1 self-reported fall in the year following the PA assessment between baseline and follow-up. A modified Poisson approach was used to estimate the relative risk of both PA accumulation and fragmentation with falls. Results Overall, 40.0% reported an incident fall. After adjustment for sociodemographic and health characteristics, those in the highest tertile of total PA accumulation had lower fall risk (aRR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.95) and those in the highest tertile of PA fragmentation had increased fall risk (aRR=1.33, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73). Models were attenuated after adjustment for physical functioning. Conclusions PA fragmentation may identify fall risk in older adults. Longitudinal studies are needed to disentangle the temporal sequencing of the complex relationship between PA and physical functioning across the life-course.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Physical activity (PA) may be an important fall prevention strategy. Current PA guidelines emphasize total PA dose, but daily patterning of PA is underappreciated. With aging, PA bouts become less frequent and shorter in duration (i.e.: more fragmented). PA fragmentation may be an indicator of fall risk, but the relationship is not well understood. This study examined daily PA accumulation and patterns with fall risk in older adults. Methods Participants (n=685, 54.3% female, 61.5% aged 70-79 years) from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) with wrist-worn accelerometry PA data from Round 11 (baseline) and sample person interviews with fall data from Round 12 (follow-up) were included. PA variables were categorized into tertiles and incident falls were defined as ≥1 self-reported fall in the year following the PA assessment between baseline and follow-up. A modified Poisson approach was used to estimate the relative risk of both PA accumulation and fragmentation with falls. Results Overall, 40.0% reported an incident fall. After adjustment for sociodemographic and health characteristics, those in the highest tertile of total PA accumulation had lower fall risk (aRR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.95) and those in the highest tertile of PA fragmentation had increased fall risk (aRR=1.33, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73). Models were attenuated after adjustment for physical functioning. Conclusions PA fragmentation may identify fall risk in older adults. Longitudinal studies are needed to disentangle the temporal sequencing of the complex relationship between PA and physical functioning across the life-course.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人体育活动的分散性与跌倒:全国健康与老龄化趋势研究的结果
背景 体力活动(PA)可能是预防跌倒的重要策略。目前的体力活动指南强调总的体力活动剂量,但对每天的体力活动模式却重视不够。随着年龄的增长,体力活动的频率会降低,持续时间会缩短(即:更加零散)。PA 碎片化可能是跌倒风险的一个指标,但两者之间的关系尚不十分清楚。本研究探讨了老年人日常活动量的积累和模式与跌倒风险的关系。方法 纳入了全国健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)的参与者(n=685,54.3% 为女性,61.5% 年龄在 70-79 岁之间),其中包括第 11 轮(基线)的腕戴式加速度计 PA 数据和第 12 轮(随访)的跌倒数据样本访谈。PA变量被分为三等分,跌倒事件被定义为在基线和随访之间的PA评估后一年内自我报告的跌倒次数≥1次。采用改进的泊松方法估算了PA累积和PA碎片与跌倒的相对风险。结果 总体而言,40.0%的人报告发生过跌倒事件。在对社会人口学和健康特征进行调整后,PA 总积累最高三分位数的人群跌倒风险较低(aRR=0.74,95% CI:0.57,0.95),PA 碎片化最高三分位数的人群跌倒风险较高(aRR=1.33,95% CI:1.03,1.73)。在对身体机能进行调整后,模型有所减弱。结论 PA 碎片化可能会识别老年人的跌倒风险。需要进行纵向研究,以厘清PA和身体机能在整个生命过程中的复杂关系的时间顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does sleep moderate the effects of exercise training or complex mental and social activities on cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke? Secondary analysis of a randomized trial The influence of body mass index on biomarkers of cellular senescence in older adults Late-onset caloric restriction improves cognitive performance and restores circadian patterns of neurotrophic, clock and epigenetic factors in the hippocampus of male old rats Longitudinal Changes in Peak Expiratory Flow Predict Risk for Incident Dementia Association between TTV viremia, chronic inflammation, and ischemic heart disease risk: Insights from MARK-AGE and Report-Age projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1