Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Kim de Jong, Susan Douglas, Miranda Wolpert, Jaime Delgadillo, Benjamin Aas, Bram Bovendeerd, Ingrid Carlier, Angelo Compare, Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Pauline Janse, Wolfgang Lutz, Christian Moltu, Samuel Nordberg, Stig Poulsen, Julian A. Rubel, Günter Schiepek, Viola N. L. S. Schilling, Maartje van Sonsbeek, Michael Barkham
{"title":"Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review","authors":"Kim de Jong,&nbsp;Susan Douglas,&nbsp;Miranda Wolpert,&nbsp;Jaime Delgadillo,&nbsp;Benjamin Aas,&nbsp;Bram Bovendeerd,&nbsp;Ingrid Carlier,&nbsp;Angelo Compare,&nbsp;Julian Edbrooke-Childs,&nbsp;Pauline Janse,&nbsp;Wolfgang Lutz,&nbsp;Christian Moltu,&nbsp;Samuel Nordberg,&nbsp;Stig Poulsen,&nbsp;Julian A. Rubel,&nbsp;Günter Schiepek,&nbsp;Viola N. L. S. Schilling,&nbsp;Maartje van Sonsbeek,&nbsp;Michael Barkham","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01381-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We face increasing demand for greater access to effective routine mental health services, including telehealth. However, treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice are only about half the size of those reported in controlled trials. Progress feedback, defined as the ongoing monitoring of patients’ treatment response with standardized measures, is an evidence-based practice that continues to be under-utilized in routine care. The aim of the current review is to provide a summary of the current evidence base for the use of progress feedback, its mechanisms of action and considerations for successful implementation. We reviewed ten available meta-analyses, which report small to medium overall effect sizes. The results suggest that adding feedback to a wide range of psychological and psychiatric interventions (ranging from primary care to hospitalization and crisis care) tends to enhance the effectiveness of these interventions. The strongest evidence is for patients with common mental health problems compared to those with very severe disorders. Effect sizes for not-on-track cases, a subgroup of cases that are not progressing well, are found to be somewhat stronger, especially when clinical support tools are added to the feedback. Systematic reviews and recent studies suggest potential mechanisms of action for progress feedback include focusing the clinician’s attention, altering clinician expectations, providing new information, and enhancing patient-centered communication. Promising approaches to strengthen progress feedback interventions include advanced systems with signaling technology, clinical problem-solving tools, and a broader spectrum of outcome and progress measures. An overview of methodological and implementation challenges is provided, as well as suggestions for addressing these issues in future studies. We conclude that while feedback has modest effects, it is a small and affordable intervention that can potentially improve outcomes in psychological interventions. Further research into mechanisms of action and effective implementation strategies is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"52 1","pages":"210 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10488-024-01381-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-024-01381-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We face increasing demand for greater access to effective routine mental health services, including telehealth. However, treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice are only about half the size of those reported in controlled trials. Progress feedback, defined as the ongoing monitoring of patients’ treatment response with standardized measures, is an evidence-based practice that continues to be under-utilized in routine care. The aim of the current review is to provide a summary of the current evidence base for the use of progress feedback, its mechanisms of action and considerations for successful implementation. We reviewed ten available meta-analyses, which report small to medium overall effect sizes. The results suggest that adding feedback to a wide range of psychological and psychiatric interventions (ranging from primary care to hospitalization and crisis care) tends to enhance the effectiveness of these interventions. The strongest evidence is for patients with common mental health problems compared to those with very severe disorders. Effect sizes for not-on-track cases, a subgroup of cases that are not progressing well, are found to be somewhat stronger, especially when clinical support tools are added to the feedback. Systematic reviews and recent studies suggest potential mechanisms of action for progress feedback include focusing the clinician’s attention, altering clinician expectations, providing new information, and enhancing patient-centered communication. Promising approaches to strengthen progress feedback interventions include advanced systems with signaling technology, clinical problem-solving tools, and a broader spectrum of outcome and progress measures. An overview of methodological and implementation challenges is provided, as well as suggestions for addressing these issues in future studies. We conclude that while feedback has modest effects, it is a small and affordable intervention that can potentially improve outcomes in psychological interventions. Further research into mechanisms of action and effective implementation strategies is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用进展反馈提高治疗效果:叙述性综述。
我们面临着越来越多的需求,需要获得更多有效的常规心理健康服务,包括远程医疗。然而,常规临床实践中的治疗效果只有对照试验报告的一半左右。进展反馈被定义为通过标准化措施对患者的治疗反应进行持续监测,这是一种以证据为基础的做法,但在常规护理中仍未得到充分利用。本综述旨在总结目前使用进展反馈的证据基础、其作用机制以及成功实施的注意事项。我们回顾了现有的十项荟萃分析,这些分析报告了小到中等的总体效应大小。结果表明,在各种心理和精神干预措施(从初级护理到住院治疗和危机护理)中加入反馈往往会提高这些干预措施的效果。最有力的证据是,与患有严重心理障碍的患者相比,有普通心理健康问题的患者的效果更好。对于进展不顺利的子群体--未上轨道的病例,研究发现其效果更强,尤其是在反馈中加入临床支持工具时。系统综述和最新研究表明,进展反馈的潜在作用机制包括集中临床医生的注意力、改变临床医生的期望、提供新信息以及加强以患者为中心的沟通。加强进展反馈干预措施的可行方法包括采用信号技术的先进系统、临床问题解决工具以及更广泛的结果和进展测量方法。我们概述了方法和实施方面的挑战,并提出了在未来研究中解决这些问题的建议。我们的结论是,虽然反馈的效果一般,但它是一种小规模且经济实惠的干预措施,有可能改善心理干预的结果。我们需要进一步研究其作用机制和有效的实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Youth Peer Advocacy and Support Services: Responding to NASEM Consensus Report on Launching Lifelong Health by Improving Health Care for Children, Youth, and Families (2024). The Use of Feedback in Mental Health Services: Expanding Horizons on Reach and Implementation Utilization of Mental Health Counseling Services Among Refugees and Asylum-Seekers in Malaysia. Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap: The Individual Placement and Support Model. Exploring Determinants of Effective Implementation of an Innovation Within Health Care: Qualitative Insights from Program Champions on Implementing One-at-a-Time Therapy Within Addictions and Mental Health Services in New Brunswick.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1