Current opinion on laryngeal electromyography

IF 0.9 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.otorri.2023.07.001
Rosa Delia Ramírez Ruiz , Mariam Quintillá , Marta Sandoval , Lucía León , Jose Miguel Costa , Miquel Quer
{"title":"Current opinion on laryngeal electromyography","authors":"Rosa Delia Ramírez Ruiz ,&nbsp;Mariam Quintillá ,&nbsp;Marta Sandoval ,&nbsp;Lucía León ,&nbsp;Jose Miguel Costa ,&nbsp;Miquel Quer","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study evaluates expert opinion on laryngeal electromyography (LEMG).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional design was used to conduct an online survey of LEMG experts in 2021. They were questioned about the number LEMG performed annually, type of electrodes used, sector worked in, pain during the test, placement of the needle electrodes, interpretation of electrical muscle parameters, diagnosis of neuromuscular injury, prognostic sensitivity in vocal fold paralysis (VFP), laryngeal dystonia, tremor and synkinesis and quantifying LEMG.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-seven professionals answered (23 Spanish and 14 from other countries), with a response rate of 21.56%. All physicians used LEMG. 91.9% had one- or two-years’ experience and 56.8% performed 10–40 LEMG per year. 70.3% were otolaryngologists and 27%, neurologists. In 89.1% of cases, a team of electrodiagnostic physician and otolaryngologist performed LEMG. 91.3% of Spanish respondents worked in Public Health, 7.14% of other nationalities; 37.8% in a university department. Bipolar concentric needles electrodes were used by 45.9% and monopolar concentric by 40.5%. 57% professionals considered good patients’ tolerance to the test. LEMG sensitivity was regarded as strong, median and interquartile range were 80.0 [60.0;90.0] to diagnose peripheral nerve injuries, less for other levels of lesions, and strong to evaluate prognosis, 70.0 [50.0;80.0]. Respondents believe locate the thyroarytenoid and the cricothyroid muscles with the needle, 80.0 [70.0;90.0], as opposed to 20.0 [0.00;60.0] the posterior cricoarytenoid. The interpretation of the electrical parts of the LEMG was strong, 80.0 [60.0;90.0]. LEMG identify movements disorders, 60.0 [20.0;80.0], and synkinesis, 70.0 [30.0;80.0]. The professionals prefer quantitative LEMG, 90.0 [60.0;90.0].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The experts surveyed consider LEMG that is well tolerated by patients. The insertional and spontaneous activity, recruitment and waveform morphology can be assessed easily. LEMG is mainly useful in the study of peripheral nerve injuries, and its value in VFP prognosis is considered strong.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 3","pages":"Pages 148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651923001097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluates expert opinion on laryngeal electromyography (LEMG).

Methods

A cross-sectional design was used to conduct an online survey of LEMG experts in 2021. They were questioned about the number LEMG performed annually, type of electrodes used, sector worked in, pain during the test, placement of the needle electrodes, interpretation of electrical muscle parameters, diagnosis of neuromuscular injury, prognostic sensitivity in vocal fold paralysis (VFP), laryngeal dystonia, tremor and synkinesis and quantifying LEMG.

Results

Thirty-seven professionals answered (23 Spanish and 14 from other countries), with a response rate of 21.56%. All physicians used LEMG. 91.9% had one- or two-years’ experience and 56.8% performed 10–40 LEMG per year. 70.3% were otolaryngologists and 27%, neurologists. In 89.1% of cases, a team of electrodiagnostic physician and otolaryngologist performed LEMG. 91.3% of Spanish respondents worked in Public Health, 7.14% of other nationalities; 37.8% in a university department. Bipolar concentric needles electrodes were used by 45.9% and monopolar concentric by 40.5%. 57% professionals considered good patients’ tolerance to the test. LEMG sensitivity was regarded as strong, median and interquartile range were 80.0 [60.0;90.0] to diagnose peripheral nerve injuries, less for other levels of lesions, and strong to evaluate prognosis, 70.0 [50.0;80.0]. Respondents believe locate the thyroarytenoid and the cricothyroid muscles with the needle, 80.0 [70.0;90.0], as opposed to 20.0 [0.00;60.0] the posterior cricoarytenoid. The interpretation of the electrical parts of the LEMG was strong, 80.0 [60.0;90.0]. LEMG identify movements disorders, 60.0 [20.0;80.0], and synkinesis, 70.0 [30.0;80.0]. The professionals prefer quantitative LEMG, 90.0 [60.0;90.0].

Conclusions

The experts surveyed consider LEMG that is well tolerated by patients. The insertional and spontaneous activity, recruitment and waveform morphology can be assessed easily. LEMG is mainly useful in the study of peripheral nerve injuries, and its value in VFP prognosis is considered strong.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于喉肌电图的最新观点
方法采用横断面设计对 2021 年的喉肌电图专家进行在线调查。调查内容包括:每年进行的喉肌电图检查次数、使用的电极类型、工作部门、检查过程中的疼痛、针电极的放置、肌肉电参数的解释、神经肌肉损伤的诊断、声带麻痹(VFP)、喉肌张力障碍、震颤和同步运动的预后敏感性以及喉肌电图的量化。所有医生都使用 LEMG。91.9%的医生有一年或两年的工作经验,56.8%的医生每年做 10-40 次 LEMG。70.3%为耳鼻喉科医生,27%为神经科医生。89.1%的病例由电诊断医师和耳鼻喉科医师组成的团队进行 LEMG 检查。91.3%的西班牙受访者在公共卫生部门工作,7.14%在其他国家工作;37.8%在大学部门工作。45.9%的受访者使用双极同心针电极,40.5%的受访者使用单极同心针电极。57%的专业人员认为患者对测试的耐受性良好。在诊断周围神经损伤方面,LEMG 的灵敏度被认为很高,中位数和四分位数范围为 80.0 [60.0;90.0],其他程度的病变灵敏度较低,而在评估预后方面,灵敏度很高,为 70.0 [50.0;80.0]。受访者认为用针头定位甲状腺腱膜和环甲肌,80.0 [70.0;90.0],而环甲肌后20.0 [0.00;60.0] 。对 LEMG 电部分的判读能力很强,为 80.0 [60.0;90.0]。LEMG 可识别运动障碍(60.0[20.0;80.0])和同步运动(70.0[30.0;80.0])。结论接受调查的专家认为,患者对 LEMG 的耐受性良好。插入性和自发性活动、募集和波形形态都很容易评估。LEMG 主要用于研究周围神经损伤,在 VFP 预后判断中具有很高的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.
期刊最新文献
Retrolabyrinthine approach to the lateral skull base: The value of preoperative temporal bone CT analysis Situación actual de la tutoría en la formación especializada en otorrinolaringología en España. ¿Dónde estamos? ¿Hacia dónde queremos ir? Prevalencia de apnea obstructiva del sueño en pacientes obesos candidatos a cirugía bariátrica y cuestionarios predictores Recurrent peritonsillar abscess in adults: Incidence and risk factors in a prospective longitudinal cohort Enhancing the coverage and rotation of anterior ethmoidal artery flap for septal perforation closure: Insights from a flap design study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1