What I really want: Policy maker views on education in Southeast Asia

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Development Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103054
Noah Yarrow , Paul Cahu , Mary E. Breeding , Rythia Afkar
{"title":"What I really want: Policy maker views on education in Southeast Asia","authors":"Noah Yarrow ,&nbsp;Paul Cahu ,&nbsp;Mary E. Breeding ,&nbsp;Rythia Afkar","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reports the views and perceptions of randomly selected education policy makers in Southeast Asia, based on surveys of 651 senior public officials in 14 middle-income countries globally. The findings show that officials tend to prioritize increasing secondary school completion over improving learning quality, despite global evidence suggesting that improving learning quality is more crucial for economic growth. Additionally, the surveyed Southeast Asian officials severely underestimate learning poverty and do so at twice the rate of officials from other countries. Officials were most likely to cite system capacity as the primary constraint to improving learning. The findings show that officials’ support for gender equality and disability inclusion is high. Interviewed officials prefer to invest in in-service teacher training or early-grade reading compared to other options such as EdTech or inclusion for students with disabilities. This mix of alignment and misalignment between policy makers’ goals and the stated goals of development partners can inform future engagement in policy dialogue, analysis, and information campaigns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059324000762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the views and perceptions of randomly selected education policy makers in Southeast Asia, based on surveys of 651 senior public officials in 14 middle-income countries globally. The findings show that officials tend to prioritize increasing secondary school completion over improving learning quality, despite global evidence suggesting that improving learning quality is more crucial for economic growth. Additionally, the surveyed Southeast Asian officials severely underestimate learning poverty and do so at twice the rate of officials from other countries. Officials were most likely to cite system capacity as the primary constraint to improving learning. The findings show that officials’ support for gender equality and disability inclusion is high. Interviewed officials prefer to invest in in-service teacher training or early-grade reading compared to other options such as EdTech or inclusion for students with disabilities. This mix of alignment and misalignment between policy makers’ goals and the stated goals of development partners can inform future engagement in policy dialogue, analysis, and information campaigns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我真正想要的是什么?决策者对东南亚教育的看法
本文在对全球 14 个中等收入国家的 651 名高级公职人员进行调查的基础上,报告了随机抽取的东南亚教育决策者的观点和看法。调查结果显示,尽管全球证据表明提高学习质量对经济增长更为重要,但官员们倾向于优先考虑提高中学毕业率,而不是提高学习质量。此外,接受调查的东南亚官员严重低估了学习贫困问题,其低估率是其他国家官员的两倍。官员们最有可能将系统能力视为改善学习的主要制约因素。调查结果显示,官员们非常支持性别平等和残疾包容。与教育技术或残疾学生融入等其他选择相比,受访官员更倾向于投资在职教师培训或低年级阅读。政策制定者的目标与发展合作伙伴的既定目标之间的一致与不一致,可以为今后参与政策对话、分析和宣传活动提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
期刊最新文献
Schools and industries producing educational-labor paths in secondary TVET in Chile: Who sets the skills agenda? Addressing extremist abuses of medieval pasts: A connection-first approach to narratives of hate ‘Aid’ to higher education in a multiplex world: Exploring the diversity of donor discourses and rationales Examining COVID-19’s disruptive effect on education in Mexican universities Full-time education: Assessment of the impact on learning of the Brazilian program Novo Mais Educação
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1