Automated dispensing cabinets and their impact on the rate of omitted and delayed doses: A systematic review

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100451
Emma Jeffrey, Melanie Dalby, Áine Walsh, Kit Lai
{"title":"Automated dispensing cabinets and their impact on the rate of omitted and delayed doses: A systematic review","authors":"Emma Jeffrey,&nbsp;Melanie Dalby,&nbsp;Áine Walsh,&nbsp;Kit Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) is increasing in hospital settings. ADCs bring various potential benefits, among which are improvements to patient safety and reduction of medication errors. A core function of ADCs is to prevent medication stock outs by triggering an order when stock is reaching low levels. A quantifiable patient safety measure is the occurrence of omitted or delayed doses, which can range in severity from being negligible, to potentially fatal. The purpose of this review is to identify and synthesise the existing evidence regarding the impact of ADCs situated in secondary and tertiary care inpatient settings, on the rate of omitted and delayed doses as a specific subsection of medication errors. In April 2024 searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed and CINAHL, with additional articles discovered through citation searching and from colleagues. A total of 375 articles were returned from the search. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common reason for exclusion was due to lack of relevance. The included papers were focused on centres which had implemented six or fewer ADCs. The studies mostly presented findings which suggest ADCs have a positive impact on the rate of omitted or delayed doses, although crucially only two papers correlated missed doses due to unavailability of medications The studies highlighted other factors which should be considered prior to the implementation of ADCs. Factors included staffing requirement, type of stock held in the cabinets, and interoperability with other systems. Studies only reported omitted or missed doses, none reported results on delayed doses. It is widely accepted that ADCs can prevent medication unavailability but there is a paucity of evidence linking the improved availability of medications through the utilisation of ADCs with the perceived impact on missed or delayed doses. Further multi-centre studies are needed to determine this causality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000489/pdfft?md5=eedc2895f9626c31e74a1774533fbaaf&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000489-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) is increasing in hospital settings. ADCs bring various potential benefits, among which are improvements to patient safety and reduction of medication errors. A core function of ADCs is to prevent medication stock outs by triggering an order when stock is reaching low levels. A quantifiable patient safety measure is the occurrence of omitted or delayed doses, which can range in severity from being negligible, to potentially fatal. The purpose of this review is to identify and synthesise the existing evidence regarding the impact of ADCs situated in secondary and tertiary care inpatient settings, on the rate of omitted and delayed doses as a specific subsection of medication errors. In April 2024 searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed and CINAHL, with additional articles discovered through citation searching and from colleagues. A total of 375 articles were returned from the search. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common reason for exclusion was due to lack of relevance. The included papers were focused on centres which had implemented six or fewer ADCs. The studies mostly presented findings which suggest ADCs have a positive impact on the rate of omitted or delayed doses, although crucially only two papers correlated missed doses due to unavailability of medications The studies highlighted other factors which should be considered prior to the implementation of ADCs. Factors included staffing requirement, type of stock held in the cabinets, and interoperability with other systems. Studies only reported omitted or missed doses, none reported results on delayed doses. It is widely accepted that ADCs can prevent medication unavailability but there is a paucity of evidence linking the improved availability of medications through the utilisation of ADCs with the perceived impact on missed or delayed doses. Further multi-centre studies are needed to determine this causality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动配药柜及其对漏服和延迟服药率的影响:系统回顾
自动配药柜(ADC)在医院环境中的使用越来越多。自动配药柜可带来各种潜在的好处,其中包括改善患者安全和减少用药错误。自动配药柜的一个核心功能是通过在库存达到低水平时触发订单来防止药品缺货。漏服或延迟服药是一项可量化的患者安全措施,其严重程度从可忽略不计到可能致命。本综述旨在确定并综合现有证据,说明在二级和三级护理住院环境中使用 ADC 对漏服和延迟服药率(作为用药错误的一个具体分项)的影响。2024 年 4 月,我们在 Embase、PubMed 和 CINAHL 中进行了检索,并通过引文检索和同事提供的信息发现了其他文章。共检索到 375 篇文章。有 9 篇文章符合纳入标准。最常见的排除原因是缺乏相关性。纳入的论文主要集中在实施了六项或六项以下 ADC 的中心。大部分研究结果表明,ADC 对漏服或延迟服药率有积极影响,但重要的是,只有两篇论文与药物供应不足导致的漏服相关。这些因素包括人员配备要求、药柜库存类型以及与其他系统的互操作性。研究只报告了漏服或漏服的情况,没有报告延迟服药的结果。人们普遍认为 ADC 可以防止药物供应不足,但将使用 ADC 改善药物供应与漏服或延迟服药的预期影响联系起来的证据却很少。要确定这种因果关系,还需要进一步开展多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the general medication adherence scale (GMAS) in patients with high blood pressure A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1