A narrative review of risk mitigation strategies in the management of opioids for chronic pain and palliative care in older adults: interprofessional collaboration with the pharmacist.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.21037/apm-23-488
Insaf Mohammad, Candice L Garwood, Lisa Binns-Emerick
{"title":"A narrative review of risk mitigation strategies in the management of opioids for chronic pain and palliative care in older adults: interprofessional collaboration with the pharmacist.","authors":"Insaf Mohammad, Candice L Garwood, Lisa Binns-Emerick","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The prevalence of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in older adults is high. Opioids carry significant risk for harm in older adults. Yet, many older adults are established on long-term opioid therapy for the treatment of CNCP despite limited documented efficacy. Many of the non-opioid options to treat pain present challenges in this population. Since challenges with tapering patients off of opioids exist, older adults may remain established on long-term opioid therapy for CNCP. While opioid use is less scrutinized for older adults receiving palliative care, significant safety concerns exist. Therefore, efforts to mitigate risks for older adults receiving long-term opioids for CNCP and for palliative care are essential. Pharmacists as members of the interprofessional team are equipped to improve safety among older adults on chronic opioid therapy. Among patients receiving palliative care, collaboration with palliative care specialists is also key. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe risk mitigation strategies for opioid use among older adults with CNCP and those receiving palliative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were identified by searching PubMed (January 1, 1990 to February 21, 2024) using the following search terms: older adults, opioids, chronic pain, palliative care, and pharmacist. The search was repeated using terms geriatric, elderly, opiates, narcotics, and controlled substances. Non-English articles and observational studies with fewer than 100 patients were excluded. Major North American and European guidelines were reviewed. Additional literature was obtained through review of relevant references of identified articles.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>A variety of risk mitigation strategies to improve safety for older adults using opioids exist. They include risk assessment, tapering opioids, reducing high-risk concomitant medications, utilizing non-opioid therapies, screening for and treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), toxicology testing, co-prescribing naloxone, utilizing controlled substance agreements, reviewing prescription drug monitoring program data, prescriber and patient education, and collaboration with pharmacists and palliative care specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are many opioid risk mitigation strategies for older adults. Collaboration with pharmacists and palliative care specialists can be an effective means for implementing strategies to optimize opioid safety for older adults with CNCP and those receiving palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"901-913"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The prevalence of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in older adults is high. Opioids carry significant risk for harm in older adults. Yet, many older adults are established on long-term opioid therapy for the treatment of CNCP despite limited documented efficacy. Many of the non-opioid options to treat pain present challenges in this population. Since challenges with tapering patients off of opioids exist, older adults may remain established on long-term opioid therapy for CNCP. While opioid use is less scrutinized for older adults receiving palliative care, significant safety concerns exist. Therefore, efforts to mitigate risks for older adults receiving long-term opioids for CNCP and for palliative care are essential. Pharmacists as members of the interprofessional team are equipped to improve safety among older adults on chronic opioid therapy. Among patients receiving palliative care, collaboration with palliative care specialists is also key. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe risk mitigation strategies for opioid use among older adults with CNCP and those receiving palliative care.

Methods: Data were identified by searching PubMed (January 1, 1990 to February 21, 2024) using the following search terms: older adults, opioids, chronic pain, palliative care, and pharmacist. The search was repeated using terms geriatric, elderly, opiates, narcotics, and controlled substances. Non-English articles and observational studies with fewer than 100 patients were excluded. Major North American and European guidelines were reviewed. Additional literature was obtained through review of relevant references of identified articles.

Key content and findings: A variety of risk mitigation strategies to improve safety for older adults using opioids exist. They include risk assessment, tapering opioids, reducing high-risk concomitant medications, utilizing non-opioid therapies, screening for and treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), toxicology testing, co-prescribing naloxone, utilizing controlled substance agreements, reviewing prescription drug monitoring program data, prescriber and patient education, and collaboration with pharmacists and palliative care specialists.

Conclusions: There are many opioid risk mitigation strategies for older adults. Collaboration with pharmacists and palliative care specialists can be an effective means for implementing strategies to optimize opioid safety for older adults with CNCP and those receiving palliative care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人慢性疼痛和姑息治疗阿片类药物管理中的风险缓解策略综述:与药剂师的跨专业合作。
背景和目的:慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)在老年人中的发病率很高。阿片类药物对老年人的伤害风险很大。然而,尽管文献记载的疗效有限,许多老年人仍长期接受阿片类药物治疗以治疗 CNCP。许多非阿片类药物治疗疼痛的方案在这一人群中都面临挑战。由于患者在逐渐停用阿片类药物时会遇到困难,因此老年人可能会继续长期使用阿片类药物治疗 CNCP。虽然对接受姑息治疗的老年人使用阿片类药物的审查较少,但仍存在重大的安全隐患。因此,必须努力降低因 CNCP 和姑息治疗而长期接受阿片类药物治疗的老年人的风险。药剂师作为跨专业团队的成员,有能力提高长期接受阿片类药物治疗的老年人的安全性。在接受姑息治疗的患者中,与姑息治疗专家的合作也很关键。本叙述性综述旨在描述患有 CNCP 和接受姑息治疗的老年人使用阿片类药物的风险缓解策略:通过使用以下检索词搜索 PubMed(1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 2 月 21 日)来确定数据:老年人、阿片类药物、慢性疼痛、姑息治疗和药剂师。使用老年病学、老年人、阿片类药物、麻醉剂和受控物质等术语重复搜索。排除了非英语文章和少于 100 名患者的观察性研究。查阅了北美和欧洲的主要指南。通过查阅已确定文章的相关参考文献获得了更多文献:有多种风险缓解策略可提高老年人使用阿片类药物的安全性。这些策略包括风险评估、减量阿片类药物、减少高风险并用药物、利用非阿片类药物疗法、筛查和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)、毒理学检测、联合处方纳洛酮、利用受管制物质协议、审查处方药监控计划数据、处方者和患者教育以及与药剂师和姑息治疗专家合作:针对老年人的阿片类药物风险缓解策略有很多。与药剂师和姑息治疗专家合作是实施优化阿片类药物安全策略的有效手段,适用于患有 CNCP 和接受姑息治疗的老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of the challenges and impact of breast cancer treatment in older adults beyond cancer diagnosis. Palliative care and hepatobiliary malignancies: say no to late referral. Stepped palliative care: considerations for equitable implementation. Breast cancer survivorship care: a narrative review of challenges and future directions. Surveillance of patients after palliative radiation, how to make it feasible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1