[Appendectomy in children: laparoscopic or open approach?]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Orvosi hetilap Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI:10.1556/650.2024.33056
Balázs Fadgyas, Gábor István Garai, Dorottya Őri, Georgina Monostori, Péter Vajda
{"title":"[Appendectomy in children: laparoscopic or open approach?]","authors":"Balázs Fadgyas, Gábor István Garai, Dorottya Őri, Georgina Monostori, Péter Vajda","doi":"10.1556/650.2024.33056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction: Many data are reachable in international literature according to the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic or open appendectomies. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in childhood based on a single-center experience. Method: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on children (0–18 years) who were operated between 2011 and 2020 in a single institute. The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic and open appendectomy (including converted laparoscopy). Co-morbidities were excluded. Patients were also divided into two groups based on the histological results: uncomplicated (negative, simplex, catarrhal, phlegmonous, gangrenous) and complicated acute appendicitis (perforated) cases. Postoperative complications (wound healing problems, intra-abdominal abscess, ileus) and length of hospital stay were analyzed. For statistical analyses, Fisher’s exact, chi2 for trend and Mann–Whitney U tests were used. Results: Altogether 1444 patients who underwent appendectomies (602 laparoscopic, 842 open) were investigated. The mean age at the time of operation was 10.93 (SD 3.49) years. Complications were observed in 45 out of 602 patients (7.48%) who underwent laparoscopy and in 83 out of 842 patients (9.86%) who underwent open operation (p = 0.1163). The median length of hospital stay in patients after laparoscopy was 3 (2; 4) days; whereas following open approach it was 4 (3; 5) days (p<0.0001). In uncomplicated cases, the median of length of hospital stay was 3 (2; 3) days after laparoscopy and 3 (3; 5) days after open approach (p<0.0001). In complicated cases, the median length of hospital stay was 8 (6; 10) days after laparoscopy and 8 (7; 10) days following open approach, respectively (p = 0.0202). Discussion: The international literature is replete with data on the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Conclusion: The study concludes that both laparoscopic and open appendectomies are safe methods for treating children with acute appendicitis, with no difference in complications. However, the hospital stay is significantly shorter following a laparoscopic procedure. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(19): 742–746.</p>","PeriodicalId":19911,"journal":{"name":"Orvosi hetilap","volume":"165 19","pages":"742-746"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orvosi hetilap","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2024.33056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many data are reachable in international literature according to the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic or open appendectomies. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in childhood based on a single-center experience. Method: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on children (0–18 years) who were operated between 2011 and 2020 in a single institute. The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic and open appendectomy (including converted laparoscopy). Co-morbidities were excluded. Patients were also divided into two groups based on the histological results: uncomplicated (negative, simplex, catarrhal, phlegmonous, gangrenous) and complicated acute appendicitis (perforated) cases. Postoperative complications (wound healing problems, intra-abdominal abscess, ileus) and length of hospital stay were analyzed. For statistical analyses, Fisher’s exact, chi2 for trend and Mann–Whitney U tests were used. Results: Altogether 1444 patients who underwent appendectomies (602 laparoscopic, 842 open) were investigated. The mean age at the time of operation was 10.93 (SD 3.49) years. Complications were observed in 45 out of 602 patients (7.48%) who underwent laparoscopy and in 83 out of 842 patients (9.86%) who underwent open operation (p = 0.1163). The median length of hospital stay in patients after laparoscopy was 3 (2; 4) days; whereas following open approach it was 4 (3; 5) days (p<0.0001). In uncomplicated cases, the median of length of hospital stay was 3 (2; 3) days after laparoscopy and 3 (3; 5) days after open approach (p<0.0001). In complicated cases, the median length of hospital stay was 8 (6; 10) days after laparoscopy and 8 (7; 10) days following open approach, respectively (p = 0.0202). Discussion: The international literature is replete with data on the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Conclusion: The study concludes that both laparoscopic and open appendectomies are safe methods for treating children with acute appendicitis, with no difference in complications. However, the hospital stay is significantly shorter following a laparoscopic procedure. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(19): 742–746.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[儿童阑尾切除术:腹腔镜还是开腹手术?]
引言:根据腹腔镜或开放式阑尾切除术的优缺点,在国际文献中可以获得许多数据。目的:本研究的目的是评估基于单中心经验的儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放式阑尾切除术。方法:采用回顾性观察队列研究方法,选取2011 ~ 2020年在同一医院手术的0 ~ 18岁儿童为研究对象。患者分为腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放式阑尾切除术两组(包括转换腹腔镜)。排除合并症。根据组织学结果将患者分为两组:无并发症(阴性、单纯性、卡他性、痰性、坏疽性)和并发症急性阑尾炎(穿孔)病例。分析术后并发症(伤口愈合问题、腹内脓肿、肠梗阻)和住院时间。统计分析采用Fisher’s exact, chi2 For trend和Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:共调查了1444例阑尾切除术患者(602例腹腔镜手术,842例开腹手术)。手术时平均年龄10.93岁(SD 3.49)。602例腹腔镜手术患者中有45例(7.48%)出现并发症,842例开放手术患者中有83例(9.86%)出现并发症(p = 0.1163)。腹腔镜术后患者住院时间中位数为3 (2;4)天;而采用开放式方法则为4 (3;5)天
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orvosi hetilap
Orvosi hetilap MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original and review papers in the fields of experimental and clinical medicine. It covers epidemiology, diagnostics, therapy and the prevention of human diseases as well as papers of medical history. Orvosi Hetilap is the oldest, still in-print, Hungarian publication and also the one-and-only weekly published scientific journal in Hungary. The strategy of the journal is based on the Curatorium of the Lajos Markusovszky Foundation and on the National and International Editorial Board. The 150 year-old journal is part of the Hungarian Cultural Heritage.
期刊最新文献
[The symptoms of burnout and possible interpretations among the healthcare workers of the Emergency Department in Szentes]. [György Heisler, who first promoted variolation in Hungarian language in 1791]. [Analysis of pharmaceutical utilization data of strong opioids prescribed for baseline and breakthrough cancer pain in Hungary]. [Psychotropic drug-induced obesity in older adults: complications, preventive and therapeutic interventions]. [Bullous pemphigoid and primary biliary cholangitis, a rare association with therapeutic challenge].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1