Inclusion of librarians and information professionals in Canadian knowledge synthesis grant funding.

Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.29173/jchla29701
Brianna Henshaw, Rachael Bradshaw, Aubrey C Geyer
{"title":"Inclusion of librarians and information professionals in Canadian knowledge synthesis grant funding.","authors":"Brianna Henshaw, Rachael Bradshaw, Aubrey C Geyer","doi":"10.29173/jchla29701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Librarians continually advocate for the expertise they can bring to knowledge synthesis research projects. Professional associations like the Canadian Health Libraries Association aim to promote librarians and information professionals as partners in health research. This push for representation must happen at a policy level to enact change. To that purpose, we explored the degree to which the inclusion of librarians and information professionals is represented at the funding level by healthcare research organizations in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a list of health research funding agencies generated from Scopus searches and an independent search of Canadian health research institutions, governmental health authorities, professional associations, and research-oriented universities to identify research grants designed for knowledge synthesis research. We examined these grants to determine whether they require or specifically mention librarians in their eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 14 knowledge synthesis grants we identified, only one required a health librarian as a member of the research team in the grant eligibility criteria. Four grants \"strongly recommended\" the inclusion of librarians on the research team, though this inclusion was not a contingency for funding.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most knowledge synthesis grants in Canada do not require, recommend, or mention librarians as members of the research or authorship team. Evidence suggests that librarian involvement substantially improves the quality of knowledge synthesis research projects; it would therefore benefit both librarians and knowledge synthesis work to advocate for librarian involvement as a contingency for grant funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Librarians continually advocate for the expertise they can bring to knowledge synthesis research projects. Professional associations like the Canadian Health Libraries Association aim to promote librarians and information professionals as partners in health research. This push for representation must happen at a policy level to enact change. To that purpose, we explored the degree to which the inclusion of librarians and information professionals is represented at the funding level by healthcare research organizations in Canada.

Methods: We used a list of health research funding agencies generated from Scopus searches and an independent search of Canadian health research institutions, governmental health authorities, professional associations, and research-oriented universities to identify research grants designed for knowledge synthesis research. We examined these grants to determine whether they require or specifically mention librarians in their eligibility criteria.

Results: Of the 14 knowledge synthesis grants we identified, only one required a health librarian as a member of the research team in the grant eligibility criteria. Four grants "strongly recommended" the inclusion of librarians on the research team, though this inclusion was not a contingency for funding.

Discussion: Most knowledge synthesis grants in Canada do not require, recommend, or mention librarians as members of the research or authorship team. Evidence suggests that librarian involvement substantially improves the quality of knowledge synthesis research projects; it would therefore benefit both librarians and knowledge synthesis work to advocate for librarian involvement as a contingency for grant funding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
将图书馆员和信息专业人员纳入加拿大知识综合资助范围。
导言:图书馆员不断宣传他们可以为知识综合研究项目带来的专业知识。加拿大健康图书馆协会等专业协会旨在促进图书馆员和信息专业人员成为健康研究的合作伙伴。这种对代表权的推动必须落实到政策层面,以实现变革。为此,我们探究了加拿大医疗保健研究机构在资金层面将图书馆员和信息专业人员纳入其中的程度:我们利用 Scopus 搜索得出的医疗研究资助机构名单,以及对加拿大医疗研究机构、政府卫生部门、专业协会和以研究为导向的大学进行的独立搜索,确定了用于知识综合研究的研究基金。我们研究了这些研究基金,以确定其资格标准中是否要求或特别提及图书馆员:在我们确定的 14 项知识综合研究基金中,只有一项在基金资格标准中要求研究团队中必须有一名卫生图书馆员。四项资助 "强烈建议 "研究团队中包括图书馆员,但这并不是获得资助的必要条件:讨论:加拿大的大多数知识综合资助项目都不要求、不推荐或不提及图书馆员是研究或著 作团队的成员。有证据表明,图书馆员的参与会大大提高知识综 合研究项目的质量;因此,倡导将图书馆员的参与作为获得资助的一个必要条件,对 图书馆员和知识综合工作都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1