Risk of prostate cancer death in men diagnosed with prostate cancer at cystoprostat-ectomy. A nationwide population-based study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.2340/sju.v59.40001
Pietro Scilipoti, Fredrik Liedberg, Hans Garmo, Andri Wilberg Orrason, Pär Stattin, Marcus Westerberg
{"title":"Risk of prostate cancer death in men diagnosed with prostate cancer at cystoprostat-ectomy. A nationwide population-based study.","authors":"Pietro Scilipoti, Fredrik Liedberg, Hans Garmo, Andri Wilberg Orrason, Pär Stattin, Marcus Westerberg","doi":"10.2340/sju.v59.40001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>One out of three men who undergo cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer is diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer (PCa) at histopathological examination. Many of these men are PSA tested as part of their follow-up, but it is unclear if this is needed. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of PCa death in these men and the need of PSA-testing during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2002 and 2020, 1,554 men were diagnosed with PCa after cystoprostatectomy performed for non-metastatic bladder cancer and registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden. We assessed their risk of death from PCa, bladder cancer and other causes up to 15 years after diagnosis by use of data in The Cause of Death Register. The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a proxy for PCa progression was assessed by fillings in The Prescribed Drug Register.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen years after diagnosis, cumulative incidence of death from PCa was 2.6% (95% CI 2.3%-2.9%), from bladder cancer 32% (95% CI: 30%-34%) and from other causes 40% (95% CI: 36%-44%). Only 35% of men with PCa recorded as primary cause of death in The Cause of Death Register had started ADT before date of death, indicating sticky-diagnosis bias with inflated risk of PCa death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For a large majority of men diagnosed with incidental PCa at cystoprostatectomy performed for bladder cancer, the risk of PCa death is very small so there is no rationale for PSA testing during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"59 ","pages":"98-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v59.40001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: One out of three men who undergo cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer is diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer (PCa) at histopathological examination. Many of these men are PSA tested as part of their follow-up, but it is unclear if this is needed. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of PCa death in these men and the need of PSA-testing during follow-up.

Methods: Between 2002 and 2020, 1,554 men were diagnosed with PCa after cystoprostatectomy performed for non-metastatic bladder cancer and registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden. We assessed their risk of death from PCa, bladder cancer and other causes up to 15 years after diagnosis by use of data in The Cause of Death Register. The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a proxy for PCa progression was assessed by fillings in The Prescribed Drug Register.

Results: Fifteen years after diagnosis, cumulative incidence of death from PCa was 2.6% (95% CI 2.3%-2.9%), from bladder cancer 32% (95% CI: 30%-34%) and from other causes 40% (95% CI: 36%-44%). Only 35% of men with PCa recorded as primary cause of death in The Cause of Death Register had started ADT before date of death, indicating sticky-diagnosis bias with inflated risk of PCa death.

Conclusions: For a large majority of men diagnosed with incidental PCa at cystoprostatectomy performed for bladder cancer, the risk of PCa death is very small so there is no rationale for PSA testing during follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱前列腺切除术后确诊为前列腺癌的男性死于前列腺癌的风险。一项基于全国人口的研究。
背景和目的:接受膀胱前列腺切除术治疗膀胱癌的男性中,每三人中就有一人在组织病理学检查中被诊断为偶发前列腺癌(PCa)。其中许多人在随访过程中接受了 PSA 检测,但目前尚不清楚是否有必要这样做。这项研究的目的是评估这些男性死于 PCa 的风险以及在随访期间进行 PSA 检测的必要性:方法:2002 年至 2020 年间,有 1554 名男性因非转移性膀胱癌接受前列腺膀胱切除术后被诊断为 PCa,并在瑞典国家前列腺癌登记处(NPCR)进行了登记。我们利用死因登记册中的数据评估了他们在确诊后 15 年内死于 PCa、膀胱癌和其他原因的风险。使用雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)作为 PCa 进展的替代方法,我们通过填写处方药登记册进行了评估:结果:确诊 15 年后,因 PCa 死亡的累计发生率为 2.6% (95% CI 2.3%-2.9%) ,因膀胱癌死亡的累计发生率为 32% (95% CI: 30%-34%) ,因其他原因死亡的累计发生率为 40% (95% CI: 36%-44%) 。死因登记册》中记录的主要死因为PCa的男性患者中,只有35%在死亡日期前开始使用ADT,这表明存在诊断偏差,导致PCa死亡风险升高:结论:对于大多数因膀胱癌接受前列腺切除术而被诊断为偶发性PCa的男性而言,PCa死亡风险非常小,因此没有理由在随访期间进行PSA检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
期刊最新文献
2023/2024 update of the national prostate cancer guidelines in Sweden. Assessment of variability in life expectancy in older men by use of new comorbidity indices. A nationwide population-based study. Time trends for the use of active surveillance and deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer in Sweden: a nationwide study. Exercise in primary care after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer - effects on postoperative complications: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. How to improve cancer care by use of guidelines and quality registers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1