Neuroticism personality, social contact, and dementia risk: A prospective cohort study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.055
Yufei Liu , Jie Chang , Yiwei Zhao , Yi Tang
{"title":"Neuroticism personality, social contact, and dementia risk: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Yufei Liu ,&nbsp;Jie Chang ,&nbsp;Yiwei Zhao ,&nbsp;Yi Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Personality traits, especially neuroticism, can influence susceptibility to dementia. Social contact mitigates stress and risk of dementia, the extent to which social contact can mitigate excess risk associated with neuroticism remains unclear. We aim to investigate whether active social contact is associated with lower neuroticism-associated excess risk of dementia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective cohort study examined 393,939 UK Biobank participants (mean [SD] age: 56.4 [8.1] years; 53.7 % female) assessed from 2006 to 2010 and followed up until December 2022. Neuroticism was measured using the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Social contact levels were assessed based on household size, contact with family or friends, and group participation. Dementia was determined using linked electronic health records.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>High neuroticism was associated with increased all-cause dementia risk and cause-specific dementia. Among high neuroticism participants, excess risk of all-cause dementia showed a stepwise decrease with increasing social contact (low: hazard ratios (HR) = 1.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.15–1.40; intermediate: HR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 1.12–1.28; high: HR = 1.07, 95 % CI = 1.00–1.15). High social contact similarly decreased excess risk of cause-specific dementia, comparable to those with low neuroticism.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Neuroticism and social contact information relied on self-report questionnaires at baseline, with a potential temporal relationship between these factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Active social contact is associated with a stepwise reduction in excess dementia risk and potentially eliminate excess risk of dementia with high neuroticism individuals, supporting social contact as a preventive strategy to attenuate excess risks of dementia from neuroticism personality trait.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"358 ","pages":"Pages 391-398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724007894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Personality traits, especially neuroticism, can influence susceptibility to dementia. Social contact mitigates stress and risk of dementia, the extent to which social contact can mitigate excess risk associated with neuroticism remains unclear. We aim to investigate whether active social contact is associated with lower neuroticism-associated excess risk of dementia.

Methods

This prospective cohort study examined 393,939 UK Biobank participants (mean [SD] age: 56.4 [8.1] years; 53.7 % female) assessed from 2006 to 2010 and followed up until December 2022. Neuroticism was measured using the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Social contact levels were assessed based on household size, contact with family or friends, and group participation. Dementia was determined using linked electronic health records.

Results

High neuroticism was associated with increased all-cause dementia risk and cause-specific dementia. Among high neuroticism participants, excess risk of all-cause dementia showed a stepwise decrease with increasing social contact (low: hazard ratios (HR) = 1.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.15–1.40; intermediate: HR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 1.12–1.28; high: HR = 1.07, 95 % CI = 1.00–1.15). High social contact similarly decreased excess risk of cause-specific dementia, comparable to those with low neuroticism.

Limitations

Neuroticism and social contact information relied on self-report questionnaires at baseline, with a potential temporal relationship between these factors.

Conclusion

Active social contact is associated with a stepwise reduction in excess dementia risk and potentially eliminate excess risk of dementia with high neuroticism individuals, supporting social contact as a preventive strategy to attenuate excess risks of dementia from neuroticism personality trait.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经质人格、社会接触与痴呆症风险:前瞻性队列研究
背景:人格特质,尤其是神经质,会影响痴呆症的易感性。社会接触可减轻压力和痴呆症风险,但社会接触在多大程度上可减轻与神经质相关的超额风险仍不清楚。我们旨在研究积极的社会接触是否与降低神经质相关的痴呆症超额风险有关:这项前瞻性队列研究调查了 393,939 名英国生物库参与者(平均 [SD] 年龄:56.4 [8.1] 岁;53.7% 为女性),他们在 2006 年至 2010 年期间接受了评估,并随访至 2022 年 12 月。神经质采用修订版艾森克人格问卷进行测量。社会接触水平根据家庭规模、与家人或朋友的接触以及团体参与情况进行评估。痴呆症是通过链接的电子健康记录确定的:结果:高神经质与全因痴呆风险和特定原因痴呆风险的增加有关。在高神经质参与者中,全因痴呆症的超额风险随着社会接触的增加而逐步降低(低:危险比 (HR) = 1.27,95 % 置信区间 (CI) = 1.15-1.40;中:危险比 = 1.20,95 % 置信区间 (CI) = 1.20-1.40):HR=1.20,95% 置信区间=1.12-1.28;高:HR=1.07,95% 置信区间=1.00-1.15)。高社会接触同样降低了特定原因痴呆症的超额风险,与低神经质者相当:局限性:神经质和社会接触信息依赖于基线时的自我报告问卷,这些因素之间可能存在时间关系:积极的社会接触可逐步降低痴呆症的超额风险,并有可能消除高神经质人群痴呆症的超额风险,这支持将社会接触作为一种预防策略,以降低神经质人格特质导致的痴呆症超额风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Task-aware multiple instance learning for stress detection from facial video data Parent-of-origin effects and cross-disorder transmission in familial psychiatric risk: A nationwide study of 1.77 million offspring Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation and heart rate variability in treatment-resistant depression: Evidence for person-specific autonomic phenotypes Do somatic symptoms bias depression screening? Reliability and equivalence of PHQ-8 in those with and without chronic pain: A nationally representative study of U.S. adults Effective connectivity of implicit emotion processing in adolescent psychiatric inpatients: Dynamic causal modeling across bipolar disorder and other psychopathologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1