Adults' recollections of discussions with their audiologist: a qualitative study of what was and was not successfully communicated about listening difficulties.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2351033
Zoe McNeice, Dani Tomlin, Barbra H B Timmer, Camille E Short, Karyn Galvin
{"title":"Adults' recollections of discussions with their audiologist: a qualitative study of what was and was not successfully communicated about listening difficulties.","authors":"Zoe McNeice, Dani Tomlin, Barbra H B Timmer, Camille E Short, Karyn Galvin","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2351033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Some adults experience challenges in successfully communicating their listening difficulties to their audiologist, and report feeling that they are not always listened to or understood. This project examined adults' recollections of discussions with their audiologist to explore (1) how adults report describing their listening difficulties and (2) information that adults report they do not communicate, or do not communicate successfully, to their audiologist.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interview transcripts were analysed using a template analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Fifteen adults who self-report listening difficulties, and who had previously consulted an audiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified from adults' recollections of how they describe their listening difficulties: (1) situation or context of listening difficulties, (2) behavioural responses, (3) impacts of listening difficulties and (4) contributing factors. Adults report not always successfully communicating (1) emotional concerns and impacts, (2) descriptions of sound quality and (3) descriptions of changed listening experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results provide insights about the times when adults feel that communication with their audiologist is successful, or unsuccessful. The results are useful for informing interventions to help adults and audiologists communicate more effectively together. To further inform interventions, factors affecting adults' communication should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"343-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2351033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Some adults experience challenges in successfully communicating their listening difficulties to their audiologist, and report feeling that they are not always listened to or understood. This project examined adults' recollections of discussions with their audiologist to explore (1) how adults report describing their listening difficulties and (2) information that adults report they do not communicate, or do not communicate successfully, to their audiologist.

Design: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interview transcripts were analysed using a template analysis approach.

Study sample: Fifteen adults who self-report listening difficulties, and who had previously consulted an audiologist.

Results: Four themes were identified from adults' recollections of how they describe their listening difficulties: (1) situation or context of listening difficulties, (2) behavioural responses, (3) impacts of listening difficulties and (4) contributing factors. Adults report not always successfully communicating (1) emotional concerns and impacts, (2) descriptions of sound quality and (3) descriptions of changed listening experiences.

Conclusion: Results provide insights about the times when adults feel that communication with their audiologist is successful, or unsuccessful. The results are useful for informing interventions to help adults and audiologists communicate more effectively together. To further inform interventions, factors affecting adults' communication should be explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人与听力学家的讨论回忆:关于听力困难的沟通成功与否的定性研究。
目的:一些成年人在向听力学家成功传达他们的听力困难方面遇到了挑战,并表示他们感觉自己并不总是被倾听或理解。本项目研究了成年人与听力学家讨论时的回忆,以探索(1)成年人如何描述他们的听力困难,以及(2)成年人认为他们没有向听力学家传达或没有成功传达的信息:设计:进行了个人半结构式访谈。研究样本:研究样本:15 名自述有听力障碍并曾咨询过听力学家的成年人:从成年人如何描述他们的听力困难的回忆中确定了四个主题:(1) 听力困难的情况或背景,(2) 行为反应,(3) 听力困难的影响和 (4) 促成因素。成人报告说,他们并不总是能够成功地表达:(1)情感关切和影响;(2)对音质的描述;(3)对改变了的听力体验的描述:研究结果提供了有关成年人认为与听力学家沟通成功或不成功的时间的见解。这些结果有助于制定干预措施,帮助成人与听力学家更有效地沟通。为了进一步为干预措施提供信息,应探讨影响成人沟通的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of cochlear implantation in adults: a scoping review of studies with qualitative methodology. Exploring the multidimensional impact of tinnitus on adolescents: a qualitative study of lived experience and professional perspective. Correction. Mobile game-based auditory training as an adjunct to aural rehabilitation in preschool children with cochlear implants: a randomised feasibility trial. An open-access dataset of unaided and hearing aid-assisted auditory perception measures in complex virtual acoustic scenes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1