Motivation and Confidence about Physical Activity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Health Benefits Matter to Patients.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiration Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1159/000539206
Cristina Aljama, Galo Granados, Marian Ramon, Miriam Barrecheguren, Eduardo Loeb, Alexa Nuñez, Eulogio Pleguezuelos, Francisco García-Río, Marc Miravitlles
{"title":"Motivation and Confidence about Physical Activity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Health Benefits Matter to Patients.","authors":"Cristina Aljama, Galo Granados, Marian Ramon, Miriam Barrecheguren, Eduardo Loeb, Alexa Nuñez, Eulogio Pleguezuelos, Francisco García-Río, Marc Miravitlles","doi":"10.1159/000539206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical activity (PA) has shown great benefits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, their PA is below average. Motivational factors associated with PA in COPD have not been widely studied and could be a target for improving adherence to PA. The objective of our study was to identify and understand the different motivational and confidence factors related to low levels of PA in a COPD cohort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational, prospective, multicenter study of COPD patients. Sociodemographic data, respiratory symptoms, comorbidities, spirometry, and exercise capacity were collected. PA was measured using the Dynaport accelerometer and patient motivation and confidence in PA were assessed by a questionnaire previously used in a COPD population in the USA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty six COPD patients were included, 68.6% being male, with a mean (SD) age of 66.6 (8.5) years and a mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (%) of 50.9% (17.3%). The mean walking time was 82.8 (37.8) minutes/day. Questions related to health benefits and enjoying exercise were ranked highest in the motivation questionnaire and statistically significant differences were found in PA measures between patients with low and high motivation. A lack of confidence regarding hot weather and health-related issues significantly influenced PA levels. Advice from third parties, including healthcare providers, was not associated with higher PA levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving the health of COPD patients is their main motivation to perform PA. Lack of confidence when it is hot or when they fear for their health is related to low levels of PA. Advice from third parties, including healthcare professionals, is not associated with higher PA. These results are relevant for developing strategies to increase the adherence of COPD patients to PA programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physical activity (PA) has shown great benefits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, their PA is below average. Motivational factors associated with PA in COPD have not been widely studied and could be a target for improving adherence to PA. The objective of our study was to identify and understand the different motivational and confidence factors related to low levels of PA in a COPD cohort.

Method: Observational, prospective, multicenter study of COPD patients. Sociodemographic data, respiratory symptoms, comorbidities, spirometry, and exercise capacity were collected. PA was measured using the Dynaport accelerometer and patient motivation and confidence in PA were assessed by a questionnaire previously used in a COPD population in the USA.

Results: Eighty six COPD patients were included, 68.6% being male, with a mean (SD) age of 66.6 (8.5) years and a mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (%) of 50.9% (17.3%). The mean walking time was 82.8 (37.8) minutes/day. Questions related to health benefits and enjoying exercise were ranked highest in the motivation questionnaire and statistically significant differences were found in PA measures between patients with low and high motivation. A lack of confidence regarding hot weather and health-related issues significantly influenced PA levels. Advice from third parties, including healthcare providers, was not associated with higher PA levels.

Conclusions: Improving the health of COPD patients is their main motivation to perform PA. Lack of confidence when it is hot or when they fear for their health is related to low levels of PA. Advice from third parties, including healthcare professionals, is not associated with higher PA. These results are relevant for developing strategies to increase the adherence of COPD patients to PA programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行体育锻炼的动机和信心:对患者而言,健康益处至关重要。
导言:体力活动(PA)对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者大有裨益,然而,他们的体力活动却低于平均水平。与慢性阻塞性肺病患者体育锻炼相关的动机因素尚未得到广泛研究,而这些因素可以成为改善患者坚持体育锻炼的目标。我们的研究旨在确定和了解与慢性阻塞性肺病患者低水平 PA 相关的不同动机和信心因素:方法:对慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究。研究收集了社会人口学数据、呼吸系统症状、合并症、肺活量和运动能力。使用 Dynaport 加速计测量患者的运动能力,并通过之前在美国慢性阻塞性肺病患者中使用过的调查问卷评估患者的运动动力和信心:共纳入 86 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者,其中 68.6% 为男性,平均(标清)年龄为 66.6(8.5)岁,平均第一秒用力呼气容积(%)为 50.9%(17.3%)。平均步行时间为 82.8 (37.8) 分钟/天。在动机问卷中,与健康益处和享受运动相关的问题排名最高,动机低和动机高的患者在运动量方面存在显著的统计学差异。对炎热天气和健康相关问题缺乏信心严重影响了患者的运动量。来自第三方(包括医疗保健提供者)的建议与较高的锻炼水平无关:结论:改善慢性阻塞性肺病患者的健康状况是他们进行体育锻炼的主要动机。当天气炎热或担心自己的健康时,缺乏自信是导致户外活动水平较低的原因。来自第三方(包括医疗保健专业人员)的建议与较高的活动量无关。这些结果对于制定提高慢性阻塞性肺病患者坚持锻炼计划的策略具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
期刊最新文献
Poor correlation between diaphragm ultrasound and invasive gold standard technique derived respiratory muscle strength assessment in patients after hospitalization for COVID-19. A multidimensional approach to the management of patients in prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation - the concept of treatable traits - a narrative review. Successful endobronchial valve placement in the treatment of persistent bronchopleural fistula and empyema allows the avoidance of right completion pneumonectomy. A High-Intensity versus Moderate-Intensity exercise training program in Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-related COPD (IMAC): a randomized, controlled trial. Mastery Learning Guided by Artificial Intelligence Is Superior to Directed Self-Regulated Learning in Flexible Bronchoscopy Training: An RCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1