Impact of Medical Education in Middle School, Directed by a Science Teacher and a Healthcare Professional, on Self-Medication and Care System Literacy. A Comparative Prospective Cohort Study.

Ghita Dubory, Victor Housset, Claire Bastard, Roxanne Liard, Marine Joulin, Arnaud Dubory, Angelo V Vasiliadis, Vasileios Giovanoulis
{"title":"Impact of Medical Education in Middle School, Directed by a Science Teacher and a Healthcare Professional, on Self-Medication and Care System Literacy. A Comparative Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ghita Dubory, Victor Housset, Claire Bastard, Roxanne Liard, Marine Joulin, Arnaud Dubory, Angelo V Vasiliadis, Vasileios Giovanoulis","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.1.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b>To assess the immediate and six-month follow-up effects of medical education simultaneously provided by a practitioner and a science teacher on middle school students regarding self-medication and knowledge of the healthcare system. <b>Methods:</b>Two groups were constituted: the learning group (L group), with students receiving an interactive medical education, and the control group (C group), which included students without medical education. Both groups were evaluated by using a six-multiple choice question (MCQ) evaluation form: three times for L group - just before the medical workshop (T0), immediately after the medical workshop (T1) and at six-month follow-up after the medical workshop (T2) - and only the evaluation at T0 for students in C group. <b>Results:</b>In L group (n=219), medical education improved all results of the evaluations related to self-medication skills (p<0.001) and knowledge of the healthcare medical system (p<0.001). Students retained their knowledge over time as no significant gap has been identified between T1 and T2 evaluations. Age, gender, grade and students' level did not have any impact on the results of L group. Students in L group had equivalent results to those in the C group (n=195) at T0 but the results increased at T1 (p<0.001) and T2 (p<0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b>Interactive medical education in middle school co-animated by a medical practitioner and a natural science teacher improves long-term teenagers' awareness of the current public health challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11079728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.1.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:To assess the immediate and six-month follow-up effects of medical education simultaneously provided by a practitioner and a science teacher on middle school students regarding self-medication and knowledge of the healthcare system. Methods:Two groups were constituted: the learning group (L group), with students receiving an interactive medical education, and the control group (C group), which included students without medical education. Both groups were evaluated by using a six-multiple choice question (MCQ) evaluation form: three times for L group - just before the medical workshop (T0), immediately after the medical workshop (T1) and at six-month follow-up after the medical workshop (T2) - and only the evaluation at T0 for students in C group. Results:In L group (n=219), medical education improved all results of the evaluations related to self-medication skills (p<0.001) and knowledge of the healthcare medical system (p<0.001). Students retained their knowledge over time as no significant gap has been identified between T1 and T2 evaluations. Age, gender, grade and students' level did not have any impact on the results of L group. Students in L group had equivalent results to those in the C group (n=195) at T0 but the results increased at T1 (p<0.001) and T2 (p<0.001). Conclusion:Interactive medical education in middle school co-animated by a medical practitioner and a natural science teacher improves long-term teenagers' awareness of the current public health challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由一名科学教师和一名医疗保健专业人员指导的中学医学教育对自我用药和护理系统知识的影响。前瞻性队列比较研究。
目的:评估由一名执业医师和一名科学教师同时提供的医学教育对中学生自我医疗和医疗系统知识的即时和六个月的后续影响。方法:分为两组:学习组(L 组)和对照组(C 组),学习组的学生接受互动式医学教育,对照组的学生未接受医学教育。两组学生均使用六道多选题(MCQ)评估表进行评估:L组学生接受三次评估,分别是医学讲习班前(T0)、医学讲习班结束后(T1)和医学讲习班结束后六个月的随访(T2);C组学生仅接受T0评估。结果:在L组(人数=219)中,医学教育改善了与自我医疗技能相关的所有评估结果(p结论:由一名医生和一名自然科学教师共同在中学开展互动式医学教育,可长期提高青少年对当前公共卫生挑战的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-Dose or Low-Dose Corticosteroids - Which Regimen is More Effective in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19? A Retrospective Study. Histological Chorioamnionitis - Experience from a Tertiary Care Center. Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Waitlisted Preoperative General Surgical Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India - Problems and Probable Solutions: an Observational Study. Improvement of Mucoid Impaction with Dupilumab in a Severe Asthma Patient. Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after COVID-19 Vaccination: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1