Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Surgeon–Physician Co-management Models on Short Term Outcomes for Vascular Surgery Inpatients☆

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.005
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Surgeon–Physician Co-management Models on Short Term Outcomes for Vascular Surgery Inpatients☆","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>As the population ages, vascular surgeons are treating progressively older, multimorbid patients at risk of peri-operative complications. An embedded physician has been shown to improve outcomes in general and orthopaedic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of surgeon–physician co-management models on morbidity and mortality rates in vascular inpatients.</p></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><p>PubMed, Scopus, Embase, conference abstract listings, and clinical trial registries.</p></div><div><h3>Review Methods</h3><p>Studies comparing adult vascular surgery inpatients under co-management with standard of care were eligible. The relative risks (RRs) of death, medical complications, and 30 day re-admission between co-management and standard care were calculated. The effect of co-management on the mean length of stay was calculated using weighted means. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies, and certainty assessment with the GRADE analysis tools.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>No randomised controlled trials were identified. Eight single institution studies between 2011 and 2020 with 7 410 patients were included. All studies were observational using before–after methodology. Studies were of high to moderate risk of bias, and outcomes were of very low GRADE certainty of evidence. Co-management was associated with a statistically significant lower relative risk of death (RR 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 – 0.92; </span><em>p</em> = .02), cardiac complications (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 – 0.87; <em>p</em> = .02), and infective complications (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35 – 0.67; <em>p</em> &lt; .001) in vascular inpatients. No statistically significant differences in length of stay (standard mean difference –0.6 days, 95% CI –1.44 – 0.24 days; <em>p</em> = .16) and 30 day re-admission (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 – 1.08; <em>p</em> = .49) were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early results of physician and surgeon co-management for vascular surgery inpatients showed promising results from very low certainty data. Further well designed, prospective studies are needed to determine how to maximise the impact of physicians within a vascular service to improve patient outcomes while using hospital resources effectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588424003836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

As the population ages, vascular surgeons are treating progressively older, multimorbid patients at risk of peri-operative complications. An embedded physician has been shown to improve outcomes in general and orthopaedic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of surgeon–physician co-management models on morbidity and mortality rates in vascular inpatients.

Data Sources

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, conference abstract listings, and clinical trial registries.

Review Methods

Studies comparing adult vascular surgery inpatients under co-management with standard of care were eligible. The relative risks (RRs) of death, medical complications, and 30 day re-admission between co-management and standard care were calculated. The effect of co-management on the mean length of stay was calculated using weighted means. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies, and certainty assessment with the GRADE analysis tools.

Results

No randomised controlled trials were identified. Eight single institution studies between 2011 and 2020 with 7 410 patients were included. All studies were observational using before–after methodology. Studies were of high to moderate risk of bias, and outcomes were of very low GRADE certainty of evidence. Co-management was associated with a statistically significant lower relative risk of death (RR 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 – 0.92; p = .02), cardiac complications (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 – 0.87; p = .02), and infective complications (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35 – 0.67; p < .001) in vascular inpatients. No statistically significant differences in length of stay (standard mean difference –0.6 days, 95% CI –1.44 – 0.24 days; p = .16) and 30 day re-admission (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 – 1.08; p = .49) were noted.

Conclusion

Early results of physician and surgeon co-management for vascular surgery inpatients showed promising results from very low certainty data. Further well designed, prospective studies are needed to determine how to maximise the impact of physicians within a vascular service to improve patient outcomes while using hospital resources effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科医生-内科医生共同管理模式对血管外科住院病人短期疗效影响的系统回顾和荟萃分析》(Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgeon-Physician Co-management Models on Short Term Outcomes for Vascular Surgery Inpentatients)。
目的:随着人口老龄化,血管外科医生正在治疗年龄逐渐增大、有围手术期并发症风险的多病患者。在普通外科和骨科手术中,嵌入式医生已被证明能改善手术效果。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究外科医生与内科医生共同管理模式对血管住院病人发病率和死亡率的影响:数据来源:PubMed、Scopus、Embase、会议摘要列表和临床试验登记:综述方法:符合条件的研究对接受共同管理的成人血管外科住院患者与 "标准护理 "进行了比较。计算了共同管理与标准护理在死亡率、医疗并发症和 30 天再入院率方面的相对风险系数(RRs)。共同管理对平均住院时间的影响采用加权平均值计算。使用非随机研究方法指数评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 分析工具评估确定性:未发现随机试验。2011年至2020年间的8项单一机构研究共纳入了7 410名患者。所有研究均采用前后对比法进行观察。研究存在高至中度偏倚风险,结果的 GRADE 证据确定性极低。在统计学上,共同管理可显著降低血管性住院患者的死亡率(RR 0.64,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.44 - 0.92;P = .02)、心脏并发症(RR 0.47,95% CI 0.25 - 0.87;P = .02)和感染并发症(RR 0.49,95% CI 0.35 - 0.67;P < .001)的相对风险。住院时间(MD -0.6天,95% CI -1.44 - 0.24天;P = .16)和30天再次入院(RR 0.96,95% CI 0.84 - 1.08;P = .49)方面的差异无统计学意义:结论:对血管外科住院病人进行内、外科医生共同管理的早期结果显示,从确定性很低的数据中得出的结果很有希望。需要进一步开展设计良好的前瞻性研究,以确定如何最大限度地发挥内科医生在血管服务中的作用,从而在有效利用医院资源的同时改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes after Endovascular Arch Repair in Patients with a Mechanical Aortic Valve: Results from a Multicentre Study. A Misdiagnosed Intravenous Leiomyomatosis. Anatomical Suitability of Iliac Branch Devices for East Asian Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. 3D Aortic Dissection Luminal Navigation: A Radiation Free Alternative or Complement to Intravascular Ultrasound? Intervention for Intermittent Claudication: "Primum Non Nocere".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1