Nutritional management in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective multicentre study.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesiology intensive therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ait.2024.138559
Justyna Karolina Danel, Maria Taborek, Agnieszka Nowotarska, Katarzyna Winiarska, Anna Dylczyk-Sommer, Wojciech Szczeklik, Szymon Białka, Tomasz Czarnik, Joanna Katarzyna Sołek-Pastuszka, Łukasz Jerzy Krzych
{"title":"Nutritional management in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective multicentre study.","authors":"Justyna Karolina Danel, Maria Taborek, Agnieszka Nowotarska, Katarzyna Winiarska, Anna Dylczyk-Sommer, Wojciech Szczeklik, Szymon Białka, Tomasz Czarnik, Joanna Katarzyna Sołek-Pastuszka, Łukasz Jerzy Krzych","doi":"10.5114/ait.2024.138559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although nutritional treatment is an established pillar of multidisciplinary care provided in critical illness, there are many concerns regarding this issue in severe COVID-19. This observational, retrospective, multicentre study aimed to analyse the approach to nutritional treatment among selected intensive care units (ICUs) in Poland.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The medical records of 129 patients hospitalized in five units due to respiratory failure following COVID-19 were analysed in terms of nutritional management on the eighth day of the ICU stay. The Harris-Benedict equation (HB), Mifflin St. Jeor equation (MsJ) and ESPEN formula (20 kcal kg -1 body weight) were used to estimate the energy target for each patient, and two ESPEN formulas determined the protein target (1 g kg -1 body weight and 1.3 g kg -1 body weight).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation of nutritional therapy was performed in 129 subjects. The fulfilment of caloric requirement considering the HB, MsJ and ESPEN formula was 66%, 66.7% and 62.5%, respectively. Two clinical centres managed to provide 70% or more of daily caloric requirements. According to the ESPEN formula, the implementation of the protein target was 70%; however, one of the investigated units provided a median of 157% of the protein demand. The nutritional management varied in the preferred route of nutrition administration. Neither method nor grade of nutrition supply influenced biochemical parameters on the 8th day of ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in nutritional treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients in Polish ICUs were noted, which underlines the importance of setting up clear guidelines regarding this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.138559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although nutritional treatment is an established pillar of multidisciplinary care provided in critical illness, there are many concerns regarding this issue in severe COVID-19. This observational, retrospective, multicentre study aimed to analyse the approach to nutritional treatment among selected intensive care units (ICUs) in Poland.

Material and methods: The medical records of 129 patients hospitalized in five units due to respiratory failure following COVID-19 were analysed in terms of nutritional management on the eighth day of the ICU stay. The Harris-Benedict equation (HB), Mifflin St. Jeor equation (MsJ) and ESPEN formula (20 kcal kg -1 body weight) were used to estimate the energy target for each patient, and two ESPEN formulas determined the protein target (1 g kg -1 body weight and 1.3 g kg -1 body weight).

Results: Evaluation of nutritional therapy was performed in 129 subjects. The fulfilment of caloric requirement considering the HB, MsJ and ESPEN formula was 66%, 66.7% and 62.5%, respectively. Two clinical centres managed to provide 70% or more of daily caloric requirements. According to the ESPEN formula, the implementation of the protein target was 70%; however, one of the investigated units provided a median of 157% of the protein demand. The nutritional management varied in the preferred route of nutrition administration. Neither method nor grade of nutrition supply influenced biochemical parameters on the 8th day of ICU stay.

Conclusions: Significant differences in nutritional treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients in Polish ICUs were noted, which underlines the importance of setting up clear guidelines regarding this issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 重症患者的营养管理:一项回顾性多中心研究。
导言:尽管营养治疗是危重症患者多学科护理的一个既定支柱,但在重症COVID-19患者中,营养治疗仍是一个令人担忧的问题。这项观察性、回顾性、多中心研究旨在分析波兰部分重症监护病房(ICU)的营养治疗方法:分析了五个重症监护室中因 COVID-19 导致呼吸衰竭而住院的 129 名患者在重症监护室住院第八天的营养管理病历。采用哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程(HB)、米夫林-圣乔尔方程(MsJ)和ESPEN公式(20千卡/公斤-1体重)估算每位患者的能量目标,并采用两种ESPEN公式确定蛋白质目标(1克/公斤-1体重和1.3克/公斤-1体重):结果:对 129 名受试者进行了营养治疗评估。根据 HB、MsJ 和 ESPEN 配方,热量需求的满足率分别为 66%、66.7% 和 62.5%。有两个临床中心能够提供每日所需热量的 70% 或更多。根据 ESPEN 计算公式,蛋白质目标的执行率为 70%;然而,其中一个调查单位提供的蛋白质中位数为蛋白质需求量的 157%。营养管理的不同之处在于首选的营养供给途径。营养供应的方法和等级均不影响重症监护室住院第 8 天的生化指标:波兰重症监护病房对 COVID-19 重症患者的营养治疗存在显著差异,这凸显了就这一问题制定明确指南的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial to compare blind intubation success through LMA Blockbuster® and I-Gel® LMA. Can't intubate, can't oxygenate? What is the preferred surgical strategy? A retrospective analysis. Measures of preoperative anxiety: Part two. Navigating through the paradox of choice: prediction of outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nutritional management in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1